9 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 2001–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital Rehabilitation Center
green
2 sentences2020This court, in Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospi- tal Rehabilitation Center, 61 Conn. App. 353 , 764 A.2d 203 , appeal dismissed, 258 Conn. 711 , 784 A.2d 889 (2001), established a three part test for determining whether allegations sound in medical malpractice. ‘‘The classification of a negligence claim as either medical malpractice or ordinary negligence requires a court to review closely the circumstances under which the alleged negligence occurred. [P]rofessional negligence or malpractice . . . [is] defined as the failure of one rendering professional services to exercise that degree of 2020This court, in Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospi- tal Rehabilitation Center, 61 Conn. App. 353 , 764 A.2d 203 , appeal dismissed, 258 Conn. 711 , 784 A.2d 889 (2001), established a three part test for determining whether allegations sound in medical malpractice. ‘‘The classification of a negligence claim as either medical malpractice or ordinary negligence requires a court to review closely the circumstances under which the alleged negligence occurred. [P]rofessional negligence or malpractice . . . [is] defined as the failure of one rendering professional services to exercise that degree of | 5 | 2001–2020 |
Bowers v. Bowers
green
2 sentences2020This court, in Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospi- tal Rehabilitation Center, 61 Conn. App. 353 , 764 A.2d 203 , appeal dismissed, 258 Conn. 711 , 784 A.2d 889 (2001), established a three part test for determining whether allegations sound in medical malpractice. ‘‘The classification of a negligence claim as either medical malpractice or ordinary negligence requires a court to review closely the circumstances under which the alleged negligence occurred. [P]rofessional negligence or malpractice . . . [is] defined as the failure of one rendering professional services to exercise that degree of 2010The Connecticut Supreme Court has specifically held that: “The classification of a negligence claim as either medical malpractice or ordinary negligence requires a court to review closely the circumstances under which the alleged negligence occurred. [Professional negligence or malpractice . . . [is] defined as the failure of one rendering professional services to exercise that degree of skill and learning commonly applied under all the circumstances in the community by the average prudent reputable member of the profession with the result of injury, loss, or damage to the recipient of those s | 4 | 2002–2020 |
Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital Rehabilitation Center
green
2 sentences2020This court, in Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospi- tal Rehabilitation Center, 61 Conn. App. 353 , 764 A.2d 203 , appeal dismissed, 258 Conn. 711 , 784 A.2d 889 (2001), established a three part test for determining whether allegations sound in medical malpractice. ‘‘The classification of a negligence claim as either medical malpractice or ordinary negligence requires a court to review closely the circumstances under which the alleged negligence occurred. [P]rofessional negligence or malpractice . . . [is] defined as the failure of one rendering professional services to exercise that degree of 2010The Connecticut Supreme Court has specifically held that: “The classification of a negligence claim as either medical malpractice or ordinary negligence requires a court to review closely the circumstances under which the alleged negligence occurred. [Professional negligence or malpractice . . . [is] defined as the failure of one rendering professional services to exercise that degree of skill and learning commonly applied under all the circumstances in the community by the average prudent reputable member of the profession with the result of injury, loss, or damage to the recipient of those s | 4 | 2002–2020 |
Santopietro v. City of New Haven
green
2 sentences2010The Connecticut Supreme Court has specifically held that: “The classification of a negligence claim as either medical malpractice or ordinary negligence requires a court to review closely the circumstances under which the alleged negligence occurred. [Professional negligence or malpractice . . . [is] defined as the failure of one rendering professional services to exercise that degree of skill and learning commonly applied under all the circumstances in the community by the average prudent reputable member of the profession with the result of injury, loss, or damage to the recipient of those s 2010The Connecticut Supreme Court has specifically held that: “The classification of a negligence claim as either medical malpractice or ordinary negligence requires a court to review closely the circumstances under which the alleged negligence occurred. [Professional negligence or malpractice . . . [is] defined as the failure of one rendering professional services to exercise that degree of skill and learning commonly applied under all the circumstances in the community by the average prudent reputable member of the profession with the result of injury, loss, or damage to the recipient of those s | 3 | 2001–2010 |
Gold v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'n
green
2 sentences2010“The classification of a negligence claim as either medical malpractice or ordinary negligence requires a court to review closely the circumstances under which the alleged negligence occurred. . . . [T]he relevant considerations in determining whether a claim sounds in medical malpractice are whether (1) the defendants are sued in their capacities as medical professionals, (2) the alleged negligence is of a specialized medical nature that arises out of the medical professional-patient relationship, and (3) the alleged negligence is substantially related to medical diagnosis or treatment and in 2010“The classification of a negligence claim as either medical malpractice or ordinary negligence requires a court to review closely the circumstances under which the alleged negligence occurred. . . . [T]he relevant considerations in determining whether a claim sounds in medical malpractice are whether (1) the defendants are sued in their capacities as medical professionals, (2) the alleged negligence is of a specialized medical nature that arises out of the medical professional-patient relationship, and (3) the alleged negligence is substantially related to medical diagnosis or treatment and in | 2 | 2008–2010 |
Boone v. William W. Backus Hospital
green
1 sentence2017Backus Hospital , 272 Conn. 551 , 562, 864 A.2d 1 (2005). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Miranda
green
1 sentence2017Backus Hospital , 272 Conn. 551 , 562, 864 A.2d 1 (2005). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Camposano v. Claiborn
green
2 sentences2001Furthermore, malpractice “presupposes some improper conduct in the treatment or operative skill [or] . . . the failure to exercise requisite medical skill . . . .” (Citations omitted; emphasis added.) Camposano v. Claiborn, 2 Conn. Cir. Ct. 135, 136-37 , 196 A.2d 129 (1963). 2001Furthermore, malpractice “presupposes some improper conduct in the treatment or operative skill [or] . . . the failure to exercise requisite medical skill . . . .” (Citations omitted; emphasis added.) Camposano v. Claiborn, 2 Conn. Cir. Ct. 135, 136-37 , 196 A.2d 129 (1963). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.