green
Positive treatment
Issue: consideration of several factorsCT ↗
Issue: arrest violationCT ↗
Issue: parties agree ruleCT ↗
Issue: inclusion clauseCT ↗
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Walters v. Servidio
See Schwartz v. Mur- phy, 74 Conn. App. 286, 297 , 812 A.2d 87 (2002), cert. denied, 263 Conn. 908 , 819 A.2d 841 (2003), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 820 , 126 S. Ct. 352 , 163 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
57 Broad Street Stamford, LLC v. Summer House Owners, LLC
See Schwartz v. Murphy , 74 Conn. App. 286 , 297 n.7, 812 A.2d 87 (2002) ("[e]xcept as limited by the terms of the servitude ... the holder of the servient estate is entitled to make any use of the servient estate that does not unreasonably interfere with enjoyment of the servitude" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 263 Conn. App. 908 , 819 A.2d 841 (2003), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 820 , 126 S.Ct. 352 , 163 L.Ed.2d 61 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kepple v. Dohrmann
See Schwartz v. Murphy, 74 Conn. App. 286, 293 , 812 A.2d 87 (2002) (although deed did not use word “easement,” “[t]here is no question that the restrictions in the defendants’ deed express the intent to establish a view easement over the defendants’ property”), cert. denied, 263 Conn. 908 , 819 A.2d 841 (2003), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 820 , 126 S. Ct. 352 , 163 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lawson
See State v. Dubose, 75 Conn. App. 163, 174 , 815 A.2d 213 , cert. denied, 263 Conn. 909 , 819 A.2d 841 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Stefanoni v. Duncan
See Schwartz v. Murphy, 74 Conn. App. 286 , 298 n.8, 812 A.2d 87 (2002), cert. denied, 263 Conn. 908 , 819 A.2d 841 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Cornfield Point Ass'n v. Town of Old Saybrook
See Schwartz v. Murphy, 74 Conn. App. 286, 291-92 , 812 A.2d 87 (2002), cert. denied, 263 Conn. 908 , 819 A.2d 841 (2003); see also General Statutes § 7-31.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gaston
See State v. Hammond, 257 Conn. 610, 622 , 778 A.2d 108 (2001). “[I]n testing the amount of evidence that supports probable cause, it is not the personal knowledge of the arresting officer, but the collective knowledge of the law enforcement organization at the time of the arrest that must be considered.” State v. Arline, 74 Conn. App. 693, 702 , 813 A.2d 153 , cert. denied, 263 Conn. 907 , 819 A.2d 841 (2003), citing State v. Dennis, 189 Conn. 429, 432 , 456 A.2d 333 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
THOMAS J. WEIHING
v.
HONORABLE JONATHAN E. SILBERT
v.
HONORABLE JONATHAN E. SILBERT
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 25, 2003.
John T. Bochanis, in support of the petition., Barbara A. Frederick, Christopher L. Brigham and Jennifer Groves, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 23363) is denied.