State v. Camacho, 891 A.2d 1 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Camacho, 891 A.2d 1 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Smith
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Camacho , 92 Conn. App. 271 , 284-85, 884 A.2d 1038 (2005) (concluding that any Doyle violation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, noting that jury may have found the defendant's alibi defense "weak" because "rebuttal witnesses could not give a consistent story," and stating that prosecutor's challenged remarks "were not used to attack the defendant's alibi"), cert. denied, 276 Conn. 935 , 891 A.2d 1 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
DANIEL J. CAMACHO
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 4, 2006.
891 A.2d 1
James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 16 opinions  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 271 (AC 25014), is denied.