Keeter v. Alpine Towers Int'l, Inc., 766 S.E.2d 375 (S.C. 2014). · Go Syfert
Search
Keeter v. Alpine Towers Int'l, Inc., 766 S.E.2d 375 (S.C. 2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“substantial compliance means compliance with the essential requirements of the act.”
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Ex Parte: Robert Horn
S.C. Ct. App. · 2022 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
substantial compliance means compliance with the essential requirements of the act.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Sease v. Sease
S.C. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
Id. at 385 , 709 S.E.2d at 652. "'Consent lies at the foundation of the adoption process,' and therefore, '[i]n order for the court to issue a valid adoption decree, it must appear that the parent has consented or otherwise forfeited his or her parental rights.'" Brown v. Baby Girl Harper, 410 S.C. 446, 451 , 766 S.E.2d 375, 378 (2014) (alteration in Brown) (quoting Gardner v. Baby Edward, 288 S.C. 332, 333 , 342 S.E.2d 601, 602 (1986)).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B. (3×) also: Cited "see"
Utah · 2017 · confidence medium
Id. at 378 (citation omitted). 11 ¶ 33 The majority attacks these cases on several grounds, none of which is persuasive.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Adoptive Father 1 v. Adoptive Father 2
S.C. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
Code Ann § 63-9-350 (2010) (permitting parents to withdraw their consents if the consents were obtained through duress or coercion and if withdrawal would be in the best interest of the child); id. ("The entry of the final decree of adoption renders any consent or relinquishment irrevocable."); McCann v. Doe, 377 S.C. 373 , 389 n.8, 660 S.E.2d 500 , 509 n.8 (2008) ("[A] challenge to the consent for relinquishment may only occur prior to an adoption . . . ."); Brown v. Baby Girl Harper, 410 S.C. 446, 454 , 766 S.E.2d 375, 379 (2014) ("What a legislature says in the text of a statute is conside…
discussed Cited "see" Stoneledge at Lake Keowee v. IMK Development Co., LLC (2×)
S.C. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keeter v. Alpine Towers Int'l, Inc., 410 S.C. 445 , 766 S.E.2d 375 (2014). 10 The court of appeals also noted Marick's argument that the HOA should have been required to elect a remedy between the three causes of action.
discussed Cited "see" Stoneledge at Lake Keowee v. IMK Development Co., LLC (2×)
S.C. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keeter v. Alpine Towers Int'l, Inc., 410 S.C. 445 , 766 S.E.2d 375 (2014). 10 The court of appeals also noted Marick's argument that the HOA should have been required to elect a remedy between the three causes of action.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lawrence KEETER, Ronald Travis Keeter, and Rebecca Keeter
v.
ALPINE TOWERS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and Ashley Sexton, of whom Alpine Towers International, Inc., is
Appellate Case No. 2012-212878.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Sep 11, 2014.
766 S.E.2d 375
Beatty, Hearn, Kittredge, Pleicones, Toal.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of South Caro… (1)

The parties submitted a joint motion to dismiss this matter in which petitioner seeks review of the Court of Appeals’ opinion in Keeter v. Alpine Towers Int’l, Inc., 399 S.C. 179, 730 S.E.2d 890 (Ct.App.2012). We grant the joint motion to dismiss this matter. We hereby direct the Court of Appeals to depublish its opinion and assign the matter an unpublished opinion number. The above opinion shall no longer have any precedential effect.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, C.J. /s/COSTA M. PLEICONES, J. /s/DONALD W. BEATTY, J. /s/JOHN W. KITTREDGE, J.

FOR THE COURT

HEARN, J., not participating.