People v. Perry, 746 N.W.2d 847 (Mich. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Perry, 746 N.W.2d 847 (Mich. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases · …the sewage-disposal-system- event exception, mcl 691.1417(2) and (3). ⚠ not in text
89 citation events (89 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Autumn Pregizer v. MyMichigan Health and MyMichigan Medical Center–West Branch
E.D. Mich. · 2026 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
our textual analysis is supported by caselaw stating that the wrongful-death act is essentially a "filter" through which the underlying claim may proceed.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Allstate Indemnity Company v. Marcy
E.D. Mich. · 2023 · confidence medium
Comm’n, 480 Mich. 75, 85 , 746 N.W.2d 847, 854 (2008) (citing Eide v. Kelsey–Hayes Co., 431 Mich. 26, 29 , 427 N.W.2d 488 (1988)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Kerchen v. University of Michigan
E.D. Mich. · 2023 · confidence medium
Comm’n, 746 N.W.2d 847, 856 (Mich. 2008) (wrongful death claim is “filter” for underlying claim); M.C.L. 691.1411(3) (incorporating COCA’s limitations period).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Sexton v. Cernuto
E.D. Mich. · 2021 · confidence medium
Comm’n, 746 N.W.2d 847, 854 (Mich. 2008).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Garcia v. Ethicon, Inc.
S.D.W. Va · 2020 · confidence medium
While Mr. Garcia’s claim for loss of consortium is derivative of Ms. Garcia’s claim, “it is nonetheless regarded as a separate cause of action[.]” Road Comm’n, 746 N.W.2d 847, 854 (Mich. 2008).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Schindewolf v. City of Brighton (2×) also: Cited "see"
E.D. Mich. · 2015 · confidence medium
Wesche v. Mecosta County Road Comm’n, 480 Mich. 75 , 746 N.W.2d 847, 854 (2008).
cited Cited "see" Siddock v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
W.D. Mich. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wesche, 480 Mich, at 91-93 , 746 N.W.2d 847 ; Darrow v. Potterville Sch.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James Norman PERRY, Defendant-Appellee.
136005.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Mar 13, 2008.
746 N.W.2d 847
Weaver.
Published

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

WEAVER, J., dissents and states as follows:

I dissent from the order denying leave to appeal and would reverse that part of the trial court's order granting defendant's motion to exclude testimony the prosecutor sought to introduce under MCL 768.27a for the same reasons stated in Justice Corrigan's dissenting statement.

CORRIGAN, J., dissents and states as follows:

I dissent from the order denying leave to appeal. I would reverse that part of the trial court's order granting defendant's motion to exclude testimony the prosecution sought to introduce under MCL 768.27a. The evidence is admissible under the plain language of the statute. Even assuming that MRE 403 applies, the trial court abused its discretion in concluding that the proffered evidence should be excluded, because the defendant failed to establish that the "probative value" of the evidence "is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. . . ." MRE 403.

MARKMAN, J., dissents and states as follows:

I would stay the trial court proceedings in order to allow this Court more than several hours to review the prosecutor's application for leave to appeal and to afford this Court the opportunity to address the relationship between MRE 403 and 404 and MCL 768.27a.