In Re Forfeiture of $180,975.00, 717 N.W.2d 336 (Mich. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Forfeiture of $180,975.00, 717 N.W.2d 336 (Mich. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People of Michigan v. Michael David Braekevelt
Mich. Ct. App. · 2025 · confidence medium
People v Jackson, 475 Mich 909, 910 (2006).2 Nevertheless, before admitting any such evidence, the trial court must determine that the defense has a good- faith basis for presenting the evidence, and it may only be introduced consistent with MRE 404(b) or MRE 608(b).
cited Cited "see" People of Michigan v. Juan Martinez III
Mich. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v Jackson, 475 Mich 909, 910 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re FORFEITURE OF $180,975.00 People of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
$180,975.00 in U.S. Currency, Defendant, and Tamika Shante Smith, Claimant-Appellant, and Todd Fitzgerarld Fletcher, Claimant.
127983.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Jul 21, 2006.
717 N.W.2d 336
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

By order of November 2, 2005, this Court directed the Van Buren County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal. On order of the Court, the brief having been filed, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is again considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be addressed: (1) the proper application of the exclusionary rule in a forfeiture proceeding in which the property subject to forfeiture has been illegally seized, and (2) whether In re Forfeiture of United States Currency, 166 Mich.App. 81, 420 N.W.2d 131 (1988), was correctly decided.

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.