People v. Apgar, 711 N.W.2d 372 (Mich. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Apgar, 711 N.W.2d 372 (Mich. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Under fire — who is questioning this case
Citations from separate opinions of courts that could overrule this case, and citations using reconsideration language. This is a warning signal, not a treatment change. The flag color above is unaffected.
Reconsideration language Tim Edward Brugger II v. Midland County Bd of Road Commissioners (2021)
“The grant order did not mention the County Road Law at all, even though the case concerned a county road accident; instead, the Court asked the parties to brief whether Hobbs’s prejudice requirement should be overruled. Rowland, 474 Mich at 1099-1100 .”
Reconsideration language Estate of Brendon Pearce v. Eaton County Road Commission (2021)
“Rowland v Washtenaw Co Rd Comm, 474 Mich 1099, 1099-1100 (2006).”
Reconsideration language Tim Edward Brugger II v. Midland County Bd of Road Commissioners (2021)
“Rowland v Washtenaw Co Rd Comm, 474 Mich 1099, 1099-1100 (2006).”
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Tim Edward Brugger II v. Midland County Bd of Road Commissioners
Mich. · 2021 · confidence medium
Rowland v Washtenaw Co Rd Comm, 474 Mich 1099, 1099-1100 (2006).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Estate of Brendon Pearce v. Eaton County Road Commission
Mich. · 2021 · confidence medium
Rowland v Washtenaw Co Rd Comm, 474 Mich 1099, 1099-1100 (2006).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Tim Edward Brugger II v. Midland County Bd of Road Commissioners
Mich. · 2021 · confidence medium
Rowland v Washtenaw Co Rd Comm, 474 Mich 1099, 1099-1100 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michael Scott APGAR, Defendant-Appellee.
127651.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Mar 31, 2006.
711 N.W.2d 372
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties are directed to include among the issues briefed whether the prosecution is an "aggrieved party" within the meaning of MCR[*373] 7.203(A), in light of the fact that the Court of Appeals affirmed defendant's conviction.