People v. NYX, 711 N.W.2d 83 (Mich. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. NYX, 711 N.W.2d 83 (Mich. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the open and obvious doctrine is inapplicable to this case, because defendant did not possess or control the premises within which plaintiff was injured.”
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) David Finazzo v. Fire Equipment Company
Mich. Ct. App. · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the open and obvious doctrine is inapplicable to this case, because defendant did not possess or control the premises within which plaintiff was injured.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Maurice Lamont NYX, Defendant-Appellee.
127897.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Mar 31, 2006.
711 N.W.2d 83
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Michigan Court of Appeals (1)

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED.