U. States v. Job L. Barber, 9 Cranch 243 (1815). · Go Syfert
Search
U. States v. Job L. Barber, 9 Cranch 243 (1815). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Doe v. Geller
N.D. Cal. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See The Adeline, 9 Cranch 244 , 13 U.S. 244, 253 , 3 L.Ed. 719 (1815).
discussed Cited "see" Dowling v. Isthmian S.S. Corporation
3rd Cir. · 1950 · signal: see · confidence high
See The Adeline, 9 Cranch [ 13 U.S. 244 ] 244 [ 3 L.Ed. 719 ]; The Caroline, 7 Cranch [ 11 U.S. 496 ] 496 [ 3 L.Ed. 417 ]; The Anne, Id. 570; The Edward, 1 Wheat. [ 14 U. S. 261 ] 261 [ 4 L.Ed. 86 ]; Newell v. Norton, 3 Wall. [ 70 U.S. 257 ] 257 [ 18 L.Ed. 271 ], These great powers are derived from the very constitution of the court, and the immemorial course of its proceedings.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jon Conrad Joseph Ronald \Ron\" Micheli Clarence Vranish Clara Jean Vranish and Troy Nolan v. The Uinta County Republican Party
unknown court · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also The Adeline, 13 U.S. (9 Cranch) 244, 253 , 3 L.Ed. 719 (1815) (‘Now the construction must depend on the evident meaning and intent of the legislature, as clearly to be gathered from a view of the whole provision; and it may be adopted as a fundamental rule, that where there is an 8 express provision, there shall not be a provision by implication; expressio unius est exclusio alterius.’).” Gordon, ¶ 24, 413 P.3d at 1102 (quoting Walters v. State ex rel.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gordon v. State
Wyo. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also The Adeline , 13 U.S. (9 Cranch) 244, 253 , 3 L.Ed. 719 (1815) ("Now the construction must depend on the evident meaning and intent of the legislature, as clearly to be gathered from a view of the whole provision; and it may be adopted as a fundamental rule, that where there is an express provision, there shall not be a provision by implication; expressio unius est exclusio alterius .").
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kara Walters v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Department of Transportation
Wyo. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also The Adeline, 13 U.S. (9 Cranch) 244, 253 , 3 L.Ed. 719 (1815) ("Now the construction must depend on the evident meaning and intent of the legislature, as clearly to be gathered from a view of the whole provision; and it may be adopted as a fundamental rule, that where there is an express provision, there shall not be a provision by implication; ex-pressio unius est exclusio alterius."). [119] The legislature rationally chose to require the advisements listed in § 31-6-102(a)(ii), and the arresting officer complied with the statute by giving them.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Kara Walters v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Department of Transportation
Wyo. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also The Adeline, 13 U.S. (1 Cranch) 244, 253 , 3 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc. v. W. E. Hedger Transp. Corp.
2d Cir. · 1948 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., The Adeline, 9 Cranch 244, 284, 3 L.Ed. 719’; The Divina Pastora; 4 Wheat, 52, 64-65, 4 L.Ed. 512 ; Hughes v. Roosevelt, 2 Cir., 107 F.2d 901, 903 ; Fyfe v. Pan-Atlantic S. S. Corp., 2 Cir., 114 F.2d 72, 75 ; 2 Benedict, Admiralty, 6th Ed. § 355.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The United States
v.
Job L. Barber
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1815.
9 Cranch 243
Tódjr.
in such case' made and provided

This Court ordered itto be certified to the Circuit Court, that it is the opinion of this Court that fat cattle are provisions, or munitions of war, within the true intent and meaning, of the act, entitled «• an act to prohibit « American vessels from proceeding to or trading with « the enemies of the United States, and for other pur- « poses.”