D.E. v. K.F. (N.D. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
D.E. v. K.F. (N.D. 2012). Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." S.E.L. v. J.A.P.
N.D. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
N.D.C.C. § 14-20-42; see also D.E., 2012 ND 253, ¶ 11 , 825 N.W.2d 832 . [¶21] Here, the district court found the child had an acknowledged father and concluded S.E.L.’s action to adjudicate the child’s parentage was precluded under N.D.C.C. § 14-20-44, which applies to proceedings to adjudicate the paternity of a child who has an acknowledged father.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." S.E.L. v. J.A.P.
N.D. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
N.D.C.C. § 14-20-42; see also D.E., 2012 ND 253, ¶ 11 , 825 N.W.2d 832 . [¶21] Here, the district court found the child had an acknowledged father and concluded S.E.L.’s action to adjudicate the child’s parentage was precluded under N.D.C.C. § 14-20-44, which applies to proceedings to adjudicate the paternity of a child who has an acknowledged father.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." S.E.L. v. J.A.P.
N.D. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
N.D.C.C. § 14-20-42 ; see also D.E. , 2012 ND 253 , ¶ 11, 825 N.W.2d 832 . [¶21] Here, the district court found the child had an acknowledged father and concluded S.E.L.'s action to adjudicate the child's parentage was precluded under N.D.C.C. § 14-20-44, which applies to proceedings to adjudicate the paternity of a child who has an acknowledged father.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
D.E.
v.
K.F.
20120069.
North Dakota Supreme Court.
Dec 18, 2012.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

Filed 12/18/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 251

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Patrick Wayne Wolfgram, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20120286

Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Richard W. Grosz, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Ronald W. McBeth, Assistant State’s Attorney, Law Enforcement Center, 413 3rd Avenue N., Wahpeton, ND 58075, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.

Don R. Krassin, 120 South 1st Street, Wahpeton, ND 58075, for defendant and appellant; on brief.

State v. Wolfgram

No. 20120286

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Patrick Wolfgram appeals a trial court judgment sentencing him to twenty years in prison with five years suspended for five years after pleading guilty in an open plea to attempted murder.  On appeal, he argues the sentence was cruel and unusual and grossly disproportionate to the offense.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7); see State v. Gomez , 2011 ND 29, ¶ 28, 793 N.W.2d 451 (sentence within statutory sentencing range is neither cruel and unusual nor disproportionate to the offense).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring