discussed Cited "see" United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Laura Snell, Cross-Appellee See Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259, 263 , 104 S.Ct. 1051, 1053 , 79 L.Ed.2d 288 (1983), where the Supreme Court, citing Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 324 , 60 S.Ct. 540, 541 , 84 L.Ed. 783 (1940), noted that “[fjinality as a condition of review is an historic characteristic of federal appellate procedure” and that “the jurisdictional statute applicable to this case [ 28 U.S.C. § 1291 ] limits the jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to appeals from ‘final decisions of the district courts.’ ” 4 In United States v. Thompson, 814 F.2d 1472 (10th Cir.1987), ce r…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gregory Charles Ervasti, United States of America v. Deniene \Dee\" Ervasti" Compare United States v. Thompson, 814 F.2d 1472, 1475-77 (10th Cir.) (discerning no colorable double jeopardy claim notwithstanding that, like here, same agreement gave rise to first charge of conspiracy to commit mail fraud under "offense” provision of § 371 and second charge of conspiracy to impede lawful function of United States under "defraud” provision of § 371), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 830 , 108 S.Ct. 101 , 98 L.Ed.2d 61 (1987), with United States v. Smith, 891 F.2d 703, 712 (9th Cir. 1989) (concluding, in holding that single indictment count charged under both provisions of § 37…

cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. George Tsosie See also United States v. Thompson, 814 F.2d 1472, 1474-75 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 830 , 108 S.Ct. 101 , 98 L.Ed.2d 61 (1987).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." White v. State (2×) Rule 14.4; see also Johnson v. State, 291 Ark. 260 , 724 S.W.2d 160 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 101 , 98 L.Ed.2d 61 (1987).