Dalbeck v. Bi-Mart Corp. (2021)

green · 29 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 3

Treatment trajectory · 2021 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

202120232026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Dalbeck v. Bi-Mart Corp. (2021)

Rule Authority · Or. Ct. App. · 4 citations in this opinion

Finally, ORS 659A.406 prohibits aiding and abetting discrimination on the basis of “age if the indi- vidual is 18 years of age or older.” As the majority points out, Cite as 315 Or App 129 (2021) 143 it “would make little sense” for the OPAA to allow discrimi- nation against persons age 18 to 20 but prohibit aiding and abetting that same discrimination. 315 Or App at 135-36.

green Randall v. Valk (2023)

Cited (see also) · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion

Co., 209 Or App 99, 105 , 146 P3d 370 (2006) (referring to bill in which statute was enacted as con- text); Young v. State of Oregon, 161 Or App 32, 35 , 983 P2d 1044 , rev den, 329 Or 447 (1999) (context “may include other provisions of the same statute and related statutes, prior enactments and prior judicial interpretations of those and related statutes, and the historical context of the relevant enactments” (internal citations omitted)); see also Dalbeck v. Bi-Mart Corp.…

same, citing Young

green Klein v. BOLI (2022)

Cited · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Dalbeck v. Bi-Mart Corp., 315 Or App 129, 131-40 , 500 P3d 711 (2021) (analyzing the scope of the statutory exceptions to the bar on age discrimination contained in ORS 659A.403).

analyzing the scope of the statutory exceptions to the bar on age discrimination contained in ORS 659A.403