Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.406
Aiding or abetting certain discrimination prohibited
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
659A.406 Aiding or abetting certain discrimination prohibited. Except as otherwise authorized by ORS 659A.403, it is an unlawful practice for any person to aid or abet any place of public accommodation, as defined in ORS 659A.400, or any employee or person acting on behalf of the place of public accommodation to make any distinction, discrimination or restriction on account of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, marital status or age if the individual is 18 years of age or older. [Formerly 30.685; 2003 c.521 §2; 2007 c.100 §6; 2021 c.367 §38]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2005–2024 · leading case: Dalbeck v. Bi-Mart Corp.
Dalbeck v. Bi-Mart Corp. (2021)
“ORS 659A.406 likewise signals that the legislature, as a general matter, intended to protect persons age 18 and older against age discrimination.”
Klein v. Or. Bureau of Labor & Indus. (2017)
“The ALJ granted the Kleins' motion for summary judgment on the allegations that Melissa had violated ORS 659A.403, and on the allegations that Aaron had aided and abetted her in violation of ORS 659A.”
Blachana, LLC v. Oregon Bureau of Labor & Industries (2015)
“403, 3 ORS 659A.406, 4 and ORS 659A.409, 5 when Penner left two *809 voicemails for Cassandra Lynn, the founder of the T-Girls, in which he asked Lynn and the T-Girls not to come back to the P Club on Friday nights.”
Klein v. BOLI (2022)
“409 and the related grant of injunctive relief, reversed and remanded as to damages, otherwise affirmed January 26, 2022 Melissa Elaine KLEIN, dba Sweetcakes by Melissa; and Aaron Wayne Klein, dba Sweetcakes by Melissa, and, in the alternative, individually as an aider and…”
Lahmann v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of Eagles (2005)
“Mark, The Vestigial Constitution: The History and Significance of the Right to Petition, 66 Fordham L.”
Palmer v. Olson (2024)
“2 Defendant also brought three counterclaims against plaintiff, alleging First Amendment retaliation under 42 USC section 1983 ; retaliation in violation of her right to free expression under Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution; and aiding and abetting…”
Warre v. Portfolio Services Limited, Inc. (2023)
“the doing of any of the acts forbidden under this chapter or to attempt to do so”); Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.406 (“it is an unlawful practice for any person to aid or abet any place of public accommodation .”
Farhoud v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC (2024)
“400, by any employee or person acting on behalf of the place or by any person aiding or abetting the place or person in violation of ORS 659A.406 may bring an action against the operator or manager of the place, the employee or person acting on behalf of the place or the aider…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.