Allen v. State (1997)
green
· 29 citation events
across 7 courts.
Showing the 14 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199720112026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
United States v. Cesar Medina-Torres (2012)
See Canady v. State, 813 So.2d 161, 161 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2002) (“The evidence was insufficient to prove [the defendant’s] criminal intent to deprive another person of property, or to appropriate the property, as required under section 812.014[.]”) (emphasis added); Allen v. State, 690 So.2d 1332, 1333-34 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1997) (“The evidence ... was sufficient to allow the jury to find the appellant guilty of grand theft because he knowingly used the *776 property of another…
green
United States v. Cesar Medina-Torres (2012)
Ct. App. 2002) (“The evidence was insufficient to prove [the defendant’s] criminal intent to deprive another person of property, or to appropriate the property, as required under section 812.014[.]”) (emphasis added); Allen v. State, 690 So. 2d 1332, 1333-34 (Fla. Dist.
green
Marlene Jaggernauth v. U.S. Attorney General (2005)
See also Canady v. State, 813 So.2d 161, 161 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2002) (“The evidence was insufficient to prove [the defendant’s] criminal intent to deprive another person of property, or to appropriate the property, as required under section 812.014”) (emphasis added); Allen v. State, 690 So.2d 1332, 1333-34 (Fla.Dist.CtApp.1997) (“The evidence, therefore, was sufficient to allow the jury to find the appellant guilty of grand theft because he knowingly used the property of ano…
green
People v. Gillis (2006)
However, in Allen v. State, 690 So.2d 1332, 1334 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App., 1997), the Florida District Court of Appeals held that a vehicle accident that occurred outside the context of a pursuit was not causally connected to the predicate felony.
green
State v. Pierce (2000)
See, e.g., Owens, 856 S.W.2d at 292 ; Lester v. State, 737 So.2d 1149, 1151 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1999); Allen v. State, 690 So.2d 1332, 1334 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1997); Russell, 503 N.W.2d at 113 ; Trull, 509 S.E.2d at 192 .
green
State of Tennessee v. Jamauri Ransom (2021)
Ct. App. 1999) (holding that the felony murder rule does not apply when the defendant, fleeing from police in a vehicle stolen by another person, collided with another car, killing the driver); Allen v. State, 690 So.2d 1332, 1334 (Fla. Dist.
holding that the felony murder rule does not apply when the defendant, while driving a stolen vehicle, was involved in a car accident that resulted in the other motorist's death
green
GEORGE O. SHRADER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
This temporal proximity was important for two reasons pertinent to the instant case: First, a felony murder conviction requires a determination that the homicide was committed by a person "engaged in the perpetration of, or in the attempt to perpetrate" the underlying qualifying felony. § 782.04(1)(a)(2), Fla. Stat. (1985); Dean v. State, 230 So. 3d 420, 423 (Fla. 2017) (observing that statutory requirement that the victim be killed "in the perpetration of" the underlying fe…
"In any felony murder conviction the element of causation, i.e. that the homicide was committed in the perpetration of the felony, must be established."
green
State of Tennessee v. Raymond Lee Swett, Jr. (2013)
Ct. App. 1999) (holding that the felony murder rule does not apply when the defendant, fleeing from police in a vehicle stolen by another person, collided with another car, killing the driver); Allen v. State, 690 So. 2d 1332, 1334 (Fla. Dist.
holding that the felony murder rule does not apply when the defendant, while driving a stolen vehicle, was involved in a car accident that resulted in the other motorist’s death
green
Baines v. State (2010)
See House v. State, 831 So.2d 1230, 1232 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (state presented no evidence of when defendant came into possession of stolen vehicle discovered missing nearly six hours before fatal crash); Lester v. State, 737 So.2d 1149, 1151-52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (defendant was not fleeing scene of crime when he caused crash while driving car which someone stole the previous evening); Allen v. State, 690 So.2d 1332, 1334-35 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (break in chain of circumstances …
break in chain of circumstances occurred between early morning hours when someone stole car and later that evening when defendant was involved in crash while driving stolen car
green
Santiago v. State (2004)
House v. State, 831 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Allen v. State, 690 So.2d 1332, 1334 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
green
House v. State (2002)
"In any felony murder conviction the element of causation, i.e. [sic] that the homicide was committed in the perpetration of the felony, must be established." Allen v. State, 690 So.2d 1332, 1334 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
green
Lester v. State (1999)
To support a felony murder conviction, the State must establish "that the homicide was committed in the perpetration of the felony." Allen v. State, 690 So.2d 1332, 1334 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
See, e.g., Allen v. State, 690 So. 2d 1332, 1334 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Parker v. State, 570 So. 2d 1048, 1051 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Mills v. State, 407 So. 2d 218, 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
green
State v. Williams (2001)
The second district reversed a third degree felony murder conviction, holding that the defendant's "reckless driving was too attenuated from the grand theft of the car the previous evening to support a felony murder conviction." Id. at 1151 (italics supplied); see Allen v. State, 690 So.2d 1332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).