How cited: Martin v. Commonwealth · Go Syfert

Martin v. Commonwealth (1987)

green · 2,085 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Quote Authority · Va. Ct. App. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See Martin, 4 Va. App. at 442 , 358 S.E.2d at 418 ("The natural reaction of any person arriving to aid one exposed to a startling event is to inquire, 'What happened?' . . .
"The natural reaction of any person arriving to aid one exposed to a startling event is to inquire, 'What happened?' . . . If the question or questioner suggested or influenced the response, then the declaration may lack the necessary reliability to be admitted."
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987).
Quote Authority · Va. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
For both offenses, “[p]enetration may be proved by circumstantial evidence and is not dependent on direct testimony from the victim that the penetration occurred.” Morrison v. Commonwealth, 10 Va. App. 300, 301 (1990); see also Martin, 4 Va. App. at 443 (“The element of penetration may be shown by circumstantial as well as direct evidence.”).
“The element of penetration may be shown by circumstantial as well as direct evidence.”
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Accordingly, “[t]he trial court’s judgment ‘will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.’” Epps v. Commonwealth, 66 Va. App. 393, 402 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987)). “[C]ircumstantial evidence is competent and is entitled to as much weight as direct evidence provided that [it] is sufficiently convincing to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of …
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
“Although not controlling, the lapse of time between the ‘startling event’ and a declaration offered in evidence is relevant to a determination whether the declaration was spontaneous and instinctive, or premeditated and deliberative.” Synan v. Commonwealth, 67 Va. App. 173, 184 (2017) (quoting Doe v. Thomas, 227 Va. 466, 471 (1984)). -5- “Also relevant to the consideration is ‘whether the declarant made an exclamation impulsively on his own initiative, or a statement in res…
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Wood v. Commonwealth, 57 Va. App. 286, 292 (2010) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Accordingly, the circuit court’s judgment “will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” Epps v. Commonwealth, 66 Va. App. 393, 402 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987)).
green Barksdale v. Clarke (2024)
Rule Authority · W.D. Va.
The trial court’s judgment “will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” Epps v. Commonwealth, 66 Va. App. 393, 402 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987)), affd, 293 Va. 403 (2017).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
The Commonwealth points out that whether malice exists is a question of fact, and “[i]n convicting Diaz of second-degree murder, the jury expressly found that she acted with malice and not under the heat of passion.” We agree with the Commonwealth that we are bound by this factual finding, “unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” Wood v. Commonwealth, 57 Va. App. 286, 292 (2010) (quoting - 21 - Martin v. Comm…
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Green Venable was indicted for two counts of possession of a Schedule I/II controlled substance on May 21, 2019. 1 “On appeal, ‘we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 1, 11 (1997) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
“The judgment of a trial court sitting without a jury is entitled to the same weight as a jury verdict and will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” Wilkins v. Commonwealth, 18 Va. App. 293, 295 (1994) (en banc) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 433 (1987) (citing Code § 8.01-680).
citing Code § 8.01-680
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 433 (1987) (citing Code § 8.01-680).
citing Code § 8.01-680
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment “will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” Epps v. Commonwealth, 66 Va. App. 393, 402 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Cuffee v. Commonwealth, 61 Va. App. 353, 357 (2013) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
With respect to the fact finder’s reading of the evidence, “[t]he judgment of a trial court sitting without a jury is entitled to the same weight as a jury verdict and will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987) (citing Code § 8.01-680).
citing Code § 8.01-680
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Accordingly, the circuit court’s judgment “will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” Epps v. Commonwealth, 66 Va. App. 393, 402 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment “will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” Epps v. Commonwealth, 66 Va. App. 393, 402 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
The trial court’s acquittal of Meade on those charges negated a necessary element of the derivative use of a firearm charges, explaining the trial court’s acquittal of Meade on those charges. -4- (2010) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
“The judgment of a trial court sitting without a jury is entitled to the same weight as a jury verdict and will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” Wood v. Commonwealth, 57 Va. App. 286, 292 (2010) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 (1987)); see Code § 8.01-680.
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Va. App. 722, 725, 781 S.E.2d 362, 364 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
BACKGROUND “On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.” Wells v. Commonwealth, 65 Va. App. 722, 725 , 781 S.E.2d 362, 364 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
“When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged on appeal, the judgment of the trial court will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is ‘plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.’” Wilson v. Commonwealth, 46 Va. App. 73, 87 , 615 S.E.2d 500, 507 (2005) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)). “[G]reat deference must be given to the factfinder who, having seen and heard the witnesses, asse…
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
“On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.” Wells v. Commonwealth, 65 Va. App. 722, 725 , 781 S.E.2d 362, 364 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
BACKGROUND “On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.” Wells v. Commonwealth, 65 Va. App. 722, 725 , 781 S.E.2d 362, 364 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
“On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting  Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.” Wells v. Commonwealth, 65 Va. App. 722, 725 , 781 S.E.2d 362, 364 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Va. App. 722, 725, 781 S.E.2d 362, 364 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
“On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.” Wells v. Commonwealth, 65 Va. App. 722, 725 , 781 S.E.2d 362, 364 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
“On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. deducible therefrom.” Wells v. Commonwealth, 65 Va. App. 722, 725 , 781 S.E.2d 362, 364 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
BACKGROUND “On appeal, ‘we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 1, 11 , 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)). * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
The trial court’s judgment “will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Cuffee v. Commonwealth, 61 Va. App. 353, 357 , 735 S.E.2d 693, 695 (2013) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Va. App. 722, 725, 781 S.E.2d 362, 364 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
“On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.” Wells v. Commonwealth, 65 Va. App. 722, 725 , 781 S.E.2d 362, 364 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
BACKGROUND “On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deductible therefrom.” Wells v. Commonwealth, 65 Va. App. 722, 725 , 781 S.E.2d 362, 364 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
The trial court’s judgment “will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” Martin v. - 11 - Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987) (citing Code § 8.01-680; Evans v. Commonwealth, 215 Va. 609, 613 , 212 S.E.2d 268, 271 (1975); Sutphin v. Commonwealth, 1 Va. App. 241, 243 , 337 S.E.2d 897, 898 (1985)).
citing Code § 8.01-680; Evans v. Commonwealth, 215 Va. 609, 613 , 212 S.E.2d 268, 271 (1975); Sutphin v. Commonwealth, 1 Va. App. 241, 243 , 337 S.E.2d 897, 898 (1985)
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Also relevant to the consideration is “whether the declarant made an exclamation impulsively on his own initiative, or a statement in response to a question.” Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va.App. 438, 441 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 417 (1987) (quoting Doe, 227 Va. at 471-72 , 318 S.E.2d at 385 ).
quoting Doe, 227 Va. at 471-72 , 318 S.E.2d at 385
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
BACKGROUND “On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.” Wells v. Commonwealth, 65 Va. App. 722, 725 , 781 S.E.2d 362, 364 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
BACKGROUND “On appeal, ‘we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 1, 11 , 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)). * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
The trial court’s judgment “will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.” Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va.App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
ANALYSIS “On appeal, ‘we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 1, 11 , 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
BACKGROUND2 “On appeal, ‘we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 1, 11 , 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Va. App. 722, 725, 781 S.E.2d 362, 364 (2016) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
BACKGROUND “On appeal, ‘we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 1, 11 , 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 438, 443, 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
BACKGROUND “On appeal, ‘we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’ ” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 1, 11 , 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va.App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
BACKGROUND “On appeal, ‘we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 1, 11 , 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Background “On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.” Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va.App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
BACKGROUND A. The Crime We present the facts “in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 1, 11 , 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
BACKGROUND “On appeal, ‘we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 1, 11 , 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).
Rule Authority · Va. Ct. App.
Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 1, 11 , 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va. App. 438, 443 , 358 S.E.2d 415, 418 (1987)).