Garrett v. State (1983)

green · 8 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 4

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Johnson v. State (2009)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Smith, P. J., and Bernes, J., concur. 1 Livingston v. State, 266 Ga. 501, 503 (1) ( 467 SE2d 886 ) (1996) (citation and punctuation omitted). 2 Compare Britt v. State, 282 Ga. 746, 751 ( 653 SE2d 713 ) (2007) (Hunstein, E J., dissenting). 3 Cf. Cox v. State, 279 Ga. 223, 226 (6) ( 610 SE2d 521 ) (2005), citing Blair v. State, 166 Ga. App. 434 (1) ( 304 SE2d 535 ) (1983). 4 Bowley v. State, 261 Ga. 278, 280 (4) ( 404 SE2d 97 ) (1991) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitt…

green Haywood v. State (2007)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Mikell and Adams, JJ., concur. 1 Eady v. State, 256 Ga. App. 696 ( 569 SE2d 603 ) (2002). 2 OCGA §16-6-3. 3 OCGA §16-6-4. 4 OCGA § 16-6-1. 5 Tant v. State, 158 Ga. App. 624, 624-625 (2) ( 281 SE2d 357 ) (1981). 6 Stewart v. State, 210 Ga. App. 474, 476 (6) ( 436 SE2d 679 ) (1993). 7 Bennett v. State, 279 Ga. App. 371, 373 (2) ( 631 SE2d 402 ) (2006). 8 Wakily v. State, 225 Ga. App. 56, 59 (4) ( 483 SE2d 313 ) (1997). 9 Garrett v. State, 169 Ga. App. 327, 328 ( 312 SE2d 621 )…

green Shropshire v. State (1997)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Garrett v. State, 169 Ga. App. 327, 328 ( 312 SE2d 621 ), cited by the defendant, is distinguishable from the case sub judice because the prior inconsistent statement of the witness targeted for impeachment in Garrett did not involve the witness’ view of a relevant matter involving the witness’ opinion.

green Banks v. Georgia Power Co. (1996)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Jordan v. Ga. Power Co., 219 Ga. App. 690 (1) ( 466 SE2d 601 ) (1995); Garrett v. State, 169 Ga. App. 327, 328 ( 312 SE2d 621 ) (1983).