Griffith v. City of Bellevue (1996)
green
· 68 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199620112026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Biomed Comm, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH BD. (2008)
Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp., 122 Wash.2d 299, 355-56 , 858 P.2d 1054 (1993) (outlining principles to guide a court's determination of appropriate sanctions). [13] 128 Wash.App. 543 , 116 P.3d 1033 (2005). [14] Finn Hill, 128 Wash.App. at 545 , 116 P.3d 1033 . [15] id. [16] Id. [17] 91 Wash.App. 697 , 958 P.2d 1035 (1998). [18] Finn Hill, 128 Wash.App. at 545 , 116 P.3d 1033 . [19] id. (emphasis added). [20] Id. at 546 , 116 P.3d 1033 . [21] Lloyd Enters., 91 Wash.App. a…
Id. at 190.
green
Foss Maritime Co. v. City of Seattle (2001)
RCW 7.16.340, which governs statutory writs of review, provides that “[ejxcept as otherwise provided in this chapter, the provisions of the code of procedure concerning civil actions are applicable to and constitute the rules of practice in the proceedings in this chapter.” See also Griffith v. City of Bellevue, 130 Wn.2d 189, 192 , 922 P.2d 83 (1996) (“RCW 7.16.340 directs us to apply the civil rules in writ proceedings.”).
“RCW 7.16.340 directs us to apply the civil rules in writ proceedings.”
green
Luckett v. Boeing Co. (1999)
See Griffith v. City of Bellevue, 130 Wn.2d 189, 192 , 922 P.2d 83 (1996); Griggs, 92 Wn.2d at 581 .
green
Crosby v. County of Spokane (1999)
See, e.g., Griffith v. City of Bellevue, 130 Wash.2d 189 , 922 P.2d 83 (1996); In re Welfare of Messmer, 52 Wash.2d 510 , 326 P.2d 1004 (1958); Gordon v. Seattle-First Nat'l Bank, 49 Wash.2d 728, 731 , 306 P.2d 739 (1957); Birch Bay Trailer Sales, Inc. v. Whatcom County, 65 Wash.App. 739 , 829 P.2d 1109 , review denied, 119 Wash.2d 1023 , 838 P.2d 690 (1992); Harkins v. South Dist. *44 Justice Court, 34 Wash.App. 508 , 662 P.2d 403 (1983). "[E]very person is presumed to know…
green
Veranth v. STATE, DEPT. OF LICENSING (1998)
See RCW 4.36.240 (requiring court in every stage of an action to disregard any error or defect in pleadings or proceedings that does not prejudice the adverse party); see also Griffith v. City of Bellevue, 130 Wash.2d 189 , 922 P.2d 83 (1996) (lack of signature on verification of a petition for writ of review did not deprive the court of jurisdiction).
lack of signature on verification of a petition for writ of review did not deprive the court of jurisdiction
green
Veranth v. Department of Licensing (1998)
See RCW 4.36.240 (requiring court in every stage of an action to disregard any error or defect in pleadings or proceedings that does not prejudice the adverse party); see also Griffith v. City of Bellevue, 130 Wn.2d 189 , 922 P.2d 83 (1996) (lack of signature on verification of a petition for writ of review did not deprive the court of jurisdiction).
lack of signature on verification of a petition for writ of review did not deprive the court of jurisdiction