Dubberly v. Nail (1983)

green · 23 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 8

Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

198420052026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Northside Corp. v. Mosby (1994)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Co., 170 Ga. App. 349 ( 317 SE2d 326 ) (1984); Dubberly v. Nail, 166 Ga. App. 378, 380-381 (4) ( 304 SE2d 504 ) (1983); see also Ludy v. Giddens, 182 Ga. App. 111 ( 354 SE2d 703 ) (1987) (physical precedent only).

green WESLEY ERIC TEMPLES v. MILTON HITSON (2023)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

While it seems quite basic and reasonable that a plaintiff’s attorney who receives notification of the defendant’s death has the responsibility to promptly initiate the necessary inquiries to determine the identity of a person to be substituted for the deceased defendant, and to file a motion for substitution in accordance with our Rules of Civil Procedure, that burden does not fall on the plaintiff until a proper notification is received through the filing and service of a …

green Diamond Woodruff v. Terrance Jones (2023)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

See Schlampp, 305 Ga. App. at 315 (2); Dubberly v. Nail, 166 Ga. App. 378, 379 (1) ( 304 SE2d 504 ) (1983).

green SCHLAMPP v. McMahon (2010)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Barnes, B J., and Bernes, J., concur. 1 Atlanta Women’s Health Group v. Clemons, 299 Ga. App. 102, 102 ( 681 SE2d 754 ) (2009). 2 Northside Corp. v. Mosby, 214 Ga. App. 806, 807 ( 449 SE2d 6 ) (1994). 3 Heslen v. Heslen, 199 Ga. App. 271, 272 (2) ( 404 SE2d 592 ) (1991). 4 Dubberly v. Nail, 166 Ga. App. 378, 379 (1) ( 304 SE2d 504 ) (1983). 5 Anderson v. Southeastern Capital Corp., 243 Ga. 498, 499 ( 255 SE2d 12 ) (1979). 6 Anderson v. Southeastern Capital Corp., 148 Ga. App…

green Vincent v. Casey (2010)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

E.g., Anderson v. Southeastern Capital Corp., 243 Ga. 498 ( 255 SE2d 12 ) (1979); Dubberly v. Nail, 166 Ga. App. 378, 379 (1) ( 304 SE2d 504 ) (1983); see also Binns v. Binns, 193 Ga. App. 554, 554-555 ( 388 SE2d 385 ) (1989); Ludy v. Giddens, 182 Ga. App. 111, 112 ( 354 SE2d 703 ) (1987) (physical precedent only); Bledsoe v. Sutton, 174 Ga. App. 248 ( 329 SE2d 589 ) (1985); Ridley v. Polk Brothers Constr.

green King v. Green (1988)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Appellant here, as administrator of his wife’s estate, “desired the protection of the 180-day limitation period,” Dubberly v. Nail, 166 Ga. App. 378, 380 (4) ( 304 SE2d 504 ) (1983), a right to which he is statutorily entitled.

green Harvey v. Oliver (1986)

Cited (see also) · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion

See also Dubberly v. Nail, 166 Ga. App. 378, 379 ( 304 SE2d 504 ) (1983); Ridley v. Polk Bros.

green Ridley v. POLK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (1984)

Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Anderson v. Southeastern Capital Corp., 243 Ga. 498, 499 ( 255 SE2d 12 ) (1979). “[T]he Supreme Court clearly held in Anderson that the 180-day limitation contained in OCGA § 9-11-25 (a) (1) (Code Ann. § 81A-125) is not triggered . . . until personal service of the suggestion of death is made upon the non-party representative of the deceased litigant’s estate.” Dubberly v. Nail, 166 Ga. App. 378, 379 ( 304 SE2d 504 ) (1983).