Stokes v. State (1992)

green · 42 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 8

Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199320092026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Arnold v. State (2005)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 6 citations in this opinion

Herring, 224 Ga.App. at 811 (1), 481 S.E.2d 842 ; Stokes, 204 Ga.App. at 142 (1), 418 S.E.2d 419 . 3.

green Jones v. State (2022)

Rule Authority · Ga. · 4 citations in this opinion

See, e.g., Moon, 312 Ga. at 36-50 (2) (trial court abused discretion in removal of a holdout juror when all jurors made up their minds quickly and trial court’s contemporaneous statements about the juror’s misconduct were not supported by findings); Mills v. State, 308 Ga. 558, 559-563 (2) ( 842 SE2d 284 ) (2020) (trial court abused discretion in removal of holdout juror who said she would change her mind only if the State had a clear- resolution video of the crime; trial co…

green Semega v. State (2010)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion

“Alternate jurors do not serve to substitute for minority jurors who cannot agree with the majority.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Stokes v. State, 204 Ga. App. 141, 142 (1) ( 418 SE2d 419 ) (1992).

green State v. Trelon Baker (2019)

Quote Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion

Recognizing that “a holdout juror is not subject to dismissal for failing to acquiesce to the other jurors’ conclusions regarding the persuasiveness of the evidence,” this Court concluded that “further investigation would have been necessary to establish additional evidence of failure to deliberate or juror misconduct before resorting to the 10 extraordinary step of replacing a juror with an alternate.” Id. at 882 (1); see also Stokes v. State, 204 Ga. App. 141, 142 (1) ( 41…

“Alternate jurors do not serve to substitute for minority jurors who cannot agree with the majority.”

green Jovani Delgado v. State (2020)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

“Alternate jurors do not serve to substitute for minority jurors who cannot agree with the majority.” Stokes v. State, 204 Ga. App. 141, 142 (1) ( 418 SE2d 419 ) (1992) (citation and punctuation omitted).

green Mason v. State (2000)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Nevertheless, whether the other jurors were present for the questioning is not a dispositive issue in this case. 3 Stokes v. State, 204 Ga. App. 141 (1) ( 418 SE2d 419 ) (1992). 4 OCGA § 15-12-172. 5 235 Ga. App. 721 -722 (1) ( 510 SE2d 370 ) (1998). 6 Id. at 722 (1). 7 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Stokes, supra at 142 (1). 8 See Scott v. State, 219 Ga. App. 798, 800 (2) ( 466 SE2d 678 ) (1996).

green Cleveland v. State (1995)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

This case differs significantly from Stokes v. State, 204 Ga. App. 141, 142 ( 418 SE2d 419 ) (1992), in that no legal cause was shown for excusing the jurors who simply indicated they were not prepared to vote.

green Kemp v. State (2003)

Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See generally Stokes v. State, 204 Ga. App. 141, 142 (1) ( 418 SE2d 419 ) (1992); United States v. Brimberry, 779 F2d 1339, 1351 (8th Cir. 1985); United States v. Steinhorn, 739 FSupp. 268, 275 (D.