Salmeri v. Salmeri (1976)

Salmeri v. Salmeri, Wyo., 554 P.2d 1244, 1252 (1976).

In Rubeling v. Rubeling, Wyo., 406 P.2d 283, 284 (1965), it is stated categorically: "* * * [W]e are compelled to answer that proof of change of circumstances is required in a support-modification proceeding, even though it is proved that the support requirements are, for practical purposes, impossible of attainment by the father." And in Salmeri v. Salmeri, Wyo., 554 P.2d 1244, 1252 (1976) this court, speaking more specifically to an alimony situation than in the previous c…

Salmeri v. Salmeri, 554 P.2d 1244, 1249 (Wyo. 1976).

Interest on judgments. (a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, all decrees and judgments for the payment of money shall bear interest at ten percent (10%) per year from the date of rendition until paid. (b) If the decree or judgment is founded on a contract and all parties to the contract agreed to interest at a certain rate, the rate of interest on the decree or judgment shall correspond to the terms of the contract. (c) A periodic payment or inst…

Similarly, the Supreme Court of Nevada stated that “the defenses preserved by Nevada’s Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act and available under NRCP 60(b) are limited to those defenses that a judgment debtor may constitutionally raise under the full faith and credit clause and which are directed to the validity of the foreign judgment.” Rosenstein v. Steele, 103 Nev. 571, 573 , 747 P.2d. 230, 232 (1987) (per curiam) (citations omitted); see also Marworth, Inc. v. *38…

“A modification hearing is not a time to reconsider the evidence and premises upon which the original judgment was entered but only to consider whether there has been such change of circumstances as to warrant a different decree.” Lewis v. Lewis, 716 P.2d 347, 351 (Wyo.1986) (quoting Salmeri v. Salmeri, 554 P.2d 1244, 1252 (Wyo.1976)).

See, e.g., Nehring v. Taylor, 266 Ark. 253 , 583 S.W.2d 56, 58 (1979) (once foreign divorce decree is properly registered pursuant to Arkansas statute, court had authority to enforce decree by contempt proceedings); Gibson v. Bennett, 561 So.2d 565, 568-70 (Fla.1990) (Florida statute embodies “pre-existing public policy that equitable remedies, including contempt, are available to enforce a judgment for support arrearages,” including foreign judgments); Salmeri v. Salmeri, 5…

While a change of circumstances can occur in a very short period of time, a period of just two months has to raise doubt about the likelihood that there has been a change sufficient to support modification. “[A] modification hearing is not a time to reconsider the evidence and premises upon which the original judgment was entered but only to consider whether there has been such change of circumstances as to warrant a different decree.” Salmeri v. Salmeri, Wyo., 554 P.2d 1244…

Morris v. Jones, 329 U.S. 545 , 67 S.Ct. 451 , 91 L.Ed. 488 (1947); Salmeri v. Salmeri, Wyo., 554 P.2d 1244, 1248 (1976); Matson v. Matson, Minn., 333 N.W.2d 862 (1983); Morris Lapidus Associates v. Airportels, Inc., 240 Pa.Super.Ct. 80 , 361 A.2d 660, 664 (1976); Jones v. Roach, 118 Ariz. 146 , 575 P.2d 345 (Ariz.Ct.App.1977).

In Salmeri v. Salmeri, 554 P.2d 1244, 1250 (Wyo.1976), the Court held that a New Jersey judgment, when filed under the Uniform Act in Wyoming, “became a full and complete judgment having the same effect as any money judgment entered in any court of this state.” In Jones v. Roach, 118 Ariz. 146 , 575 P.2d 345 (App.1977), the Court described the effects of filing a foreign judgment under the Uniform Act, holding that a Colorado judgment would be subject to the same procedures …

See Haltom v. Haltom, 755 P.2d 876, 878 (Wyo.1988); see also Salmeri v. Salmeri, 554 P.2d 1244, 1250 (Wyo.1976) (stating that a foreign judgment filed in accordance with the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act has the same effect as a judgment entered by a Wyoming court).

See generally Salmeri v. Salmeri, 554 P.2d 1244 (Wyo.1976).

See Salmeri v. Salmeri, 554 P.2d 1244, 1248 (Wyo.1976); Matson v. Matson, 333 N.W.2d 862, 867 (Minn.1983); Morris Lapidus Assoc. v. Airportels, Inc., 240 Pa.Super. 80, 85 , 361 A.2d 660, 664 (1976); Wooster v. Wooster, 399 N.W.2d 330, 333 (S.D.1987).

See Salmeri v. Salmeri, Wyo., 554 P.2d 1244 (1976).