Izzo v. State (1987)
green
· 27 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Whatley v. State (1988)
The proscribed conduct includes "holding ... bets or offers to bet." It also includes "recording... bets or offers to bet." These would be included in the prohibition against "operating or participating in the earnings of a gambling place." There being evidence that defendant was engaged in such activity, and that one of the principal uses of his residence was to hold the bets and house his recording activity, the conviction of commercial gambling should be affirmed. "[T]he …
Izzo v. State, 356 S.E.2d 204, 205 (Ga. 1987) (citing Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 357 (1983)). zoning districts or the land to which various zoning districts may apply.” Id. ¶¶ 19, 78.
citing Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 357 (1983)
Izzo v. State, 356 S.E.2d 204, 205 (Ga. 1987) (citing Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 357 (1983)); Wollschlaeger v. Governor, Fla., 848 F.3d 1293, 1319 (11th Cir. 2017).
citing Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 357 (1983)
green
Whatley v. State (2015)
(Emphasis supplied.) Parker v. City of Glennville, 288 Ga. 34, 35 (1) ( 701 SE2d 182 ) (2010). “[A] person ‘who engages in some conduct that is clearly proscribed cannot complain of the vagueness of the law as applied to the conduct of others.’ [Cits.]” Izzo v. State, 257 Ga. 109, 110 (1) ( 356 SE2d 204 ) (1987). “ ‘A court should therefore examine the complainant’s conduct before analyzing other hypothetical applications of the law.’ [Cits.]” Catoosa County v. R.N.
green
Whatley v. State (2015)
(Emphasis supplied.) Parker v. City of Glennville, 288 Ga. 34, 35 (1) ( 701 SE2d 182 ) (2010). “[A] person ‘who engages in some conduct that is clearly proscribed cannot complain of the vagueness of the law as applied to the conduct of others.’ [Cits.]” Izzo v. State, 257 Ga. 109, 110 (1) ( 356 SE2d 204 ) (1987). “ ‘A court should therefore examine the complainant's conduct before analyzing other hypothetical applications of the law.’ [Cits.]” Catoosa County v. R.N.
green
Catoosa County v. R.N. Talley Properties, LLC (2007)
Izzo v. State, 257 Ga. 109, 110 (1) ( 356 SE2d 204 ) (1987); Hubbard v. State, 256 Ga. 637, 638 ( 352 SE2d 383 ) (1987).
green
Thelen v. State (2000)
State v. Boyer, 270 Ga. 701, 702 (1) ( 512 SE2d 605 ) (1999); Hall v. State, 268 Ga. 89, 91 (1) ( 485 SE2d 755 ) (1997); State v. Hudson, 247 Ga. 36, 37 (1) ( 273 SE2d 616 ) (1981). “[A] person ‘who engages in some conduct that is clearly proscribed cannot complain of the vagueness of the law as applied to the conduct of others.’ [Cits.]” Izzo v. State, 257 Ga. 109, 110 (1) ( 356 SE2d 204 ) (1987).
green
Johnson v. State (1994)
Izzo v. State, 257 Ga. 109, 110 (1) ( 356 SE2d 204 ) (1987).
green
Laytart v. State (2009)
See also Ellis v. State, 221 Ga. App. 103, 104 ( 470 SE2d 495 ) (1996). 9 “ ‘[VJagueness challenges to statutes which do not involve First Amendment freedoms must be examined in the light of the facts of the case at hand,’ and ... a person who engages in some conduct that is clearly proscribed cannot complain of the vagueness of the law as applied to the conduct of others.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Izzo v. State, 257 Ga. 109, 110 (1) ( 356 SE2d 204 ) (1987). 10 T…
green
Griffin v. State (1994)
See generally Izzo v. State, 257 Ga. 109 ( 356 SE2d 204 ); Bloodworth v. State of Ga., supra. Decided January 10, 1994 Reconsideration denied January 27, 1994.