Hubbard v. State (1987)
green
· 55 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198720062026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Marks v. State (2005)
Although Marks mounted a constitutional challenge to the elder abuse statute on vagueness grounds in the trial court, that court determined that Marks had no standing to assert such a challenge because he failed to show that the statute as applied to his conduct, adversely impacted him. 4 Citing Dowis v. State, 243 Ga. App. 354, 355 ( 533 SE2d 434 ) (2000) (“one whose own conduct may be constitutionally proscribed will not be heard to challenge a law because it may conceivab…
green
Raber v. State (2009)
Talley Properties, 282 Ga. 373, 374 ( 651 SE2d 7 ) (2007). “[0]ne whose own conduct may be constitutionally proscribed will not be heard to challenge a law because it may conceivably be applied unconstitutionally to others. [Cits.]” Hubbard v. State, 256 Ga. 637, 638 ( 352 SE2d 383 ) (1987). “ ‘A court should therefore examine the complainant’s conduct before analyzing other hypothetical applications of the law.’ [Cits.]” Catoosa County v. R.N.
green
Catoosa County v. R.N. Talley Properties, LLC (2007)
Izzo v. State, 257 Ga. 109, 110 (1) ( 356 SE2d 204 ) (1987); Hubbard v. State, 256 Ga. 637, 638 ( 352 SE2d 383 ) (1987).
green
Beckom v. State (2007)
Johnson, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 Little v. State, 262 Ga. App. 377, 378 ( 585 SE2d 677 ) (2003), citing Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 2 (Footnote omitted.) Little, supra. 3 OCGA § 16-12-1 (b) (1). 4 OCGA § 15-11-2 (6) (A). 5 OCGA§ 3-3-23 (a) (2). 6 See generally Eckman v. State, 201 Ga. App. 879 ( 413 SE2d 221 ) (1991) (conviction under OCGA § 16-12-1 affirmed where defendant, after suggesting that runaway minor depart with his…
green
Dowis v. State (2000)
Rules & Regs., Department of Public Safety, Chapter 570-13, Specifications for Protective Headgear for Vehicular Users. 2 Regulation 570-13-.03 (1). 3 Regulation 570-13-.03 (2). 4 Regulation 570-13-.04. 5 Ritter v. State, 258 Ga. 551 (2) ( 372 SE2d 230 ) (1988). 6 Hubbard v. State, 256 Ga. 637, 638 ( 352 SE2d 383 ) (1987).
green
Howard v. State (2000)
Id.; Hubbard v. State, 256 Ga. 637, 639 ( 352 SE2d 383 ) (1987); United States v. Harriss, 347 U. S. 612, 617 (74 SC 808, 98 LE 989) (1954).
green
State v. Boyer (1999)
Id.; Hubbard v. State, 256 Ga. 637, 639 ( 352 SE2d 383 ) (1987); United States v. Harris, 347 U. S. 612, 617 (74 SC 808, 98 LE 989) (1954).
green
Tate v. State (1991)
In rejecting a constitutional challenge to OCGA § 16-11-44, the Supreme Court held in Hubbard v. State, 256 Ga. 637, 638 ( 352 SE2d 383 ) (1987) that prosecution under that statute required a showing of “ ‘not casual occurrences but general, customary habits of the house.’ ” The evidence in this case showed that appellant had encouraged at least four different minors to drink alcoholic beverages in his home on at least three different occasions.
green
Sliney v. State (1990)
See Hubbard v. State, 256 Ga. 637 ( 352 SE2d 383 ) (1987).
green
Parker v. CITY OF GLENNVILLE (2010)
See Hubbard v. State, 256 Ga. 637, 638 ( 352 SE2d 383 ) (1987). (a) Parker contends § 30-8 is unconstitutionally vague because men of ordinary intelligence would differ on the applicability of the ordinance to property located within the city limits.