United States v. Forfeiture, Stop Six Center (1991)
green
· 21 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 3 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199220092026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
People v. Superior Court (Plascencia) (2002)
(E.g., U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Property (1st Cir. 1991) 942 F.2d 74 , 78 [to satisfy standing requirement, all “that needs to be shown is a ‘facially colorable interest in the proceedings sufficient to satisfy the case-or-controversy requirement and “prudential considerations defining and limiting the role of the court” ’ [Citations.]”]; U.S. v. Cambio Exacto, S.A., supra, 166 F.3d at p. 527 [‘“[A]n allegation of ownership and some evidence of ownership are together suffi…
The government is obligated to articulate probable cause of a specific violation of Title 21; “[pjrobable cause to believe the property is related to ‘some’ illegal activity does not permit forfeiture.” U.S. v. Forfeiture Stop Six Center, 781 F.Supp. 1200, 1204 (N.D.Tex.1991) (citing U.S. v. $38,600.00 in United States Currency, 784 F.2d 694, 698-99 (5th Cir.1986)).
green
United States v. Forfeiture, Stop Six Center (1992)
See United States v. Forfeiture, Stop Six Center, 781 F.Supp. 1200, 1206-1207 (N.D.Tex.1991) (listing factual findings that led to a probable cause determination under the § 881(a)(7) facilitation provision).