End of the Road Trust Ex Rel. Fruehauf Trailer Corp. v. Terex Corp. (In Re Fruehauf Trailer Corp.) (2000)
green
· 81 citation events
across 22 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200020132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Moreover, “the Rule 9(b) heightened pleading requirement generally does not apply to state law claims of breach of fiduciary duty ...” In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 197 (D.Del.2000).
See, e.g., 10 Del.Code Ann. § 8106 (2006) (providing for three-year statute of limitations for actions arising out of fiduciary relations); In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 184 (D.Del.2000) (same).
green
Buchwald Capital Advisors LLC v. Schoen (2024)
The Trustee contends that it is not relying on the equitable tolling doctrine and, therefore, that it need not establish self- 30 In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 186 (Bankr.
quoting Litman v. Prudential-Bache Props., Inc., Civ. A. No. 12137, 1994 WL 30529 , at *4 (Del. Ch. Jan. 14, 1994)
green
In re: AMC Investors, LLC (2024)
According to Eugenia, this holding was erroneous because “public filings trigger inquiry notice only where they include facts indicating that a particular wrongful act has occurred and suggesting a need for further investigation.” (D.I. 19 at 30 (citing In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 189-92 (D.
green
Miller v. Mott (2023)
P. 7009. 14 In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 198 (D.
Fruehauf Trailer Corp. v. Terex Corp. (In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp. I), 250 B.R. 168, 183 (D.
concluding that when considering a Rule 12 (b) (6) motion to dismiss, a court may consider documents attached to or incorporated by reference into the complaint
green
Buchwald Capital Advisors LLC v. Schoen (2022)
Fruehauf Trailer Corp. v. Terex Corp. (In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp.), 250 B.R. 168, 186 (D.
holding that fraudulent concealment may be stated by alleging a business fiduciary relationship between defendants and plaintiffs, including a duty to disclose, which defendants breached
G, ¶ 17-21. 91 See In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 189 (D.
“Disclosure of wrongful acts in publicly filed documents … is deemed to put a plaintiff on inquiry notice of the wrongful acts.”
green
AMC Investors II, LLC (2022)
G, ¶ 17-21. 91 See In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 189 (D.
“Disclosure of wrongful acts in publicly filed documents … is deemed to put a plaintiff on inquiry notice of the wrongful acts.”
green
AMC Investors, LLC (2022)
G, ¶ 17-21. 91 See In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 189 (D.
“Disclosure of wrongful acts in publicly filed documents … is deemed to put a plaintiff on inquiry notice of the wrongful acts.”
G, ¶ 17-21. 91 See In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 189 (D.
“Disclosure of wrongful acts in publicly filed documents … is deemed to put a plaintiff on inquiry notice of the wrongful acts.”
green
Amgine Technologies (US), Inc. v. Harold Roy Miller (2021)
Int’l Gp., 965 A.2d at 776 (applying the “plaintiff-friendly” Rule 12(b)(6) standard to deny dismissal of breach of fiduciary duty claims alleging defendants committed “pervasive, diverse, and substantial financial fraud”); In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 197 (D.
“Although there is a dearth of case law, the Rule 9(b
green
MACREGEN, INC. v. BURNETTE (2021)
Del. 2010) (quoting In re Fruehauf Trailer Copr., 250 B.R. 168, 197 (D.
green
Juju, Inc. v. Campbell (2020)
(TAC) And in Sections IX, X and XI of the TAC, Plaintiff is very specific in articulating: (1) How from December 2017 through January 2018, after its affiliates starting complaining of low quality traffic, Plaintiff’s employees Mr. Swanson and Mr. Dusanic sought explanations from Mr. Campbell, who in turn, falsely claimed Mr. Schollmeyer and/or Mrs. Banks were resolving the problem and asked that the issue not be disclosed to Mr. Hayward.; (2) That Mr. Campbell was in fact w…
green
Boyles v. Am. Heritage Life Ins. Co. (2019)
Malia , 23 F.3d at 833 (quoting Payonk , 883 F.2d at 231 ); In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp. , 250 B.R. 168 , 205 (D.
"[T]he corporate sponsor of a benefit plan ... is generally not a fiduciary."
green
Giuliano v. Schnabel (In re DSI Renal Holdings, LLC) (2017)
Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 197-98 (D.
green
Vieira v. Hill (In re KNH Aviation Services, Inc.) (2016)
To establish fraudulent concealment based on the commission of affirmative acts of misrepresentation, the complaint must “allege [the defendants] had actual knowledge of the wrong and acted affirmatively to conceal the wrong from [the plaintiffs].” In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 186 (D.Del.2000).
green
Alamo Group, LLC v. A & G Realty Partners, LLC (2015)
In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (Bankr.D.Del.2000) (citing PBGC v. White, 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993)). "[I]f the allegations of [the] complaint are contradicted by documents made part thereof, the document controls and the Court need not accept as true allegations of the complaint.” Sierra Invs., LLC v. SHC, Inc. (In re SHC, Inc.), 329 B.R. 438, 442 (Bankr.D.Del.2005).See also Sunquest Info.
In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (D.Del.2000) (citing PBGC v. White, 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993)); see also Sands, 502 F.3d at 268 .
In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (Bankr.D.Del.2000) (citing PBGC v. White, 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993)). "[I]f the allegations of [the] complaint are contradicted by documents made part thereof, the document controls and the Court need not accept as true allegations of the complaint.” Sierra Invs., LLC v. SHC, Inc. (In re SHC, Inc.), 329 B.R. 438, 442 (Bankr.D.Del.2005).
green
NHB Assignments LLC ex rel. Liquidating Trust v. General Atlantic LLC (In re PMTS Liquidating Corp.) (2014)
Mar. 28, 2007); see also In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 197 (D.Del. 2000) (“Although there is a dearth of case law, the Rule 9(b) heightened pleading requirement generally does not apply to the state law claim[] of breach of fiduciary duty....”).
“Although there is a dearth of case law, the Rule 9(b) heightened pleading requirement generally does not apply to the state law claim[] of breach of fiduciary duty....”
green
Sass ex rel. American Home Mortgage Plan Trust v. Barclays Bank PLC (In re American Home Mortgage, Holdings, … (2013)
In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (Bankr.D.Del.2000) (citing PBGC v. White, 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993)). ”[I]f the allegations of [the] complaint are contradicted by documents made a part thereof, the document controls and the Court need not accept as true the allegations of the complaint.” Sierra Invs., LLC v. SHC, Inc. (In re SHC, Inc.), 329 B.R. 438, 442 (Bankr.D.Del.2005).
green
Korac v. QxC Communications, Inc. (2012)
In re: Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 198 (D.Del.2000).
Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (D.Del.2000) (citing PBGC v. White, 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993)). "[I]f the allegations of [the] complaint are contradicted by documents made a part thereof, the document controls and the Court need not accept as true the allegations of the complaint.” Sierra Invs., LLC v. SHC, Inc. (In re SHC, Inc.), 329 B.R. 438, 442 (Bankr.D.Del.2005).
green
Sportsman's Warehouse, Inc. v. McGllis/Eckman Investments-Billings, LLC (In Re Sportsman's Warehouse, Inc.) (2011)
End of the Road Trust v. Terex Corp. (In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp.), 250 B.R. 168, 183 (Bankr.D.Del.2000) (citing PBGC v. White, 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993)). "[I]f the allegations of [the] complaint are contradicted by documents made a part thereof, the document controls and the Court need not accept as true the allegations of the complaint.” Sierra Invs., LLC v. SHC, Inc. (In re SHC, Inc.), 329 B.R. 438, 442 (Bankr.D.Del.2005).
green
Friedman's Liquidating Trust v. Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P. (In Re Friedman's Inc.) (2011)
In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (Bankr.D.Del.2000) (citing PBGC v. White, 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993)). "[I]f the allegations of [the] complaint are contradicted by documents made a part thereof, the document controls and the Court need not accept as true the allegations of the complaint.” Sierra Invs., LLC v. SHC, Inc. (In re SHC, Inc.), 329 B.R. 438, 442 (Bankr.D.Del.2005).
green
Burtch v. Huston (In Re USdigital, Inc.) (2011)
In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (Bankr.D.Del.2000) (citing PBGC v. White, 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993)). "[I]f the allegations of [the] complaint are contradicted by documents made a part thereof, the document controls and the Court need not accept as true the allegations of the complaint.” Sierra Invs., LLC v. SHC, Inc. (In re SHC, Inc.), 329 B.R. 438, 442 (Bankr.D.Del.2005).
In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (Bankr.D.Del.2000) (citing PBGC v. White, 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993)). "[I]f the allegations of [the] complaint are contradicted by documents made a part thereof, the document controls and the Court need not accept as true the allegations of the complaint.” Sierra Invs., LLC v. SHC, Inc. (In re SHC, Inc.), 329 B.R. 438, 442 (Bankr.D.Del.2005).
green
Snowstorm Acquisition Corp. v. Tecumseh Products Co. (2010)
July 15, 2010) (quoting In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 197 (D.Del.2000) (citation omitted)).
In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (Bankr.D.Del.2000) (citing PBGC v. White, 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993)). "[I]f the allegations of [the] complaint are contradicted by documents made a part thereof, the document controls and the Court need not accept as true the allegations of the complaint.” Sierra Invs., LLC v. SHC, Inc. (In re SHC, Inc.), 329 B.R. 438, 442 (Bankr.D.Del.2005).
green
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Snyder (2010)
“Although there is a dearth of case law, the Rule 9(b) heightened pleading requirement generally does not apply to the state law claims of ... negligent misrepresentation.” In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 197 (D.Del.2000) (citation omitted).
In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (Bankr.D.Del.2000) (citing PBGC v. White, 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993)). "[I]f the allegations of [the] complaint are contradicted by documents made a part thereof, the document controls and the Court need not accept as true the allegations of the complaint.” Sierra Invs., LLC v. SHC, Inc. (In re SHC, Inc.), 329 B.R. 438, 442 (Bankr.D.Del.2005).
green
Crowe v. Moran (In Re Moran) (2009)
In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (D.Del.2000) (citing PBGC v. White, 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993)).
green
Forman v. Salzano (In Re Norvergence, Inc.) (2009)
The heightened pleading requirement of Rule 9(b) “generally does not apply to the state law claims of breach of fiduciary duty..[and] aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty....” In re Inacom Corp., 2001 WL 1819987 , *2, 2001 Bankr.LEXIS 1297 at *6 (D.Del.2001). (citing In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 197-98 (D.Del.2000) (footnotes omitted)).
green
JNA-1 Corp. v. Uni-Marts, LLC (In Re Uni-Marts, LLC) (2009)
Indus., Inc., 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993); In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (D.Del.2000).
green
Kesar, Inc. v. Uni-Marts, LLC (In Re Uni-Marts, LLC) (2009)
Indus., Inc., 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir.1993); In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (D.Del.2000).
green
Harris v. Koenig (2009)
However, “‘[d]etermining whether someone is a fiduciary is a very fact specific inquiry which is difficult to resolve on a motion to dismiss.’” Id. (quoting In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 204 (D.
green
Harris v. Koenig (2009)
However, “ ‘[d]etermin-ing whether someone is a fiduciary is a very fact specific inquiry which is difficult to resolve on a motion to dismiss.’ ” Id. (quoting In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 204 (D.Del.2000)).
green
Gonzalez-Lopez v. Cigna Group Insurance (2008)
Ga. June 19, 2007)(citing Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1502 (9th Cir.1995); In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 206 (D.Del.2000); In re Ikon Office Solutions, Inc. Sec.
First, the Trust argues that the statute of limitations for breach of fiduciary duty claim does not begin to run until the “latest date that an alleged wrongful act may have occurred.” In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 184 (D.Del.2000); (Doc. # 31, pp. 19-20); see also Albert v. Alex.
In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 197 (D.Del.2000). 12 .
In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (D.Del.2000). 2 .
End of the Road Trust v. Terex Corp. (In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp.), 250 B.R. 168, 193 (D.Del.2000), citing Carlton Investments v. TLC Beatrice Int’l Holdings, Inc., 1995 Del.
green
Miller v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc. (2005)
(Defs.’ Memo. in Opp’n at 18, citing In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 197-98 (D.Del.2000).) Because Miller did not address this issue in his reply brief, the court will assume he waived his Rule 9(b) argument. 6 .
green
Heft v. AAI CORP. (2005)
Nat’l Pension Fund v. Wakefield Indus., Inc., 699 F.2d 1254 , 1257-58 (D.C.Cir.1983); In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 200-01 (D.Del.2000).
If the statute of limitations has not run on a claim as of the bankruptcy petition date, 11 U.S.C. § 108 (a) extends the time period for filing the claim by “two years after the order for relief.” In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 185 (D.Del.2000).
green
Edes v. Verizon Communications, Inc. (2003)
Employees Pension Fund, 944 F.2d 509, 520 (9th Cir.1991) (finding that if a series of “breaches are of the same kind and nature and the plaintiff had actual knowledge of one of them more than three years before commencing suit, § 1113(a)(2) bars the action”); Pisciotta v. Teledyne Indus., Inc., 91 F.3d 1326 , 1332 (9th Cir.1996) (declining to apply continuing violations theory in ERISA case regarding con *62 tinuing denial of monthly benefits); In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., …
green
Lalonde v. Textron, Inc. (2003)
See Board of Trustees of Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen Local 6 of New Jersey Welfare Fund v. Wettlin Assocs., Inc., 237 F.3d 270, 275 (3d Cir.2001); Kayes v. Pacific Lumber Co., 51 F.3d 1449, 1461 (9th Cir.1995); In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 204 (D.Del.2000).
green
LaLonde v. REXTRON, INC. (2003)
See Board of Trustees of Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen Local 6 of New Jersey Welfare Fund v. Wettlin Assocs., Inc., 237 F.3d 270, 275 (3d Cir.2001); Kayes v. Pacific Lumber Co., 51 F.3d 1449 , 1461 (9th Cir.1995); In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 204 (D.Del. 2000).
green
Rosenberg v. XM Ventures (2001)
In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp., 250 B.R. 168, 183 (D.Del.2000) (citing In re Burlington Coat Factory Sec.