State v. Nave (1985)
green
· 123 citation events
across 7 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198520052026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Smith v. Murray (1986)
Since the death penalty was imposed in this case, however, we will review the state of the record concerning these questions”); Ice v. Commonwealth, 667 S. W. 2d 671, 674 (Ky. 1984) (“[I]n a death penalty case every prejudicial error must be considered, whether or not an objection was made in the trial court”), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 860 (1984); State v. Hamilton, 478 So. 2d 123, 127, n. 7 (La. 1985) (“In death penalty cases, this court has reviewed assignments of error, de…
“Several states hold that the general rule that allegations of court error not assigned in a motion for new trial are not preserved for appellate review, codified in Missouri Rule 29.11(d
green
Emmett C. Nave v. Paul K. Delo, Emmett C. Nave v. Paul K. Delo, Emmett C. Nave v. Paul K. Delo (1995)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 731-33 (Mo.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
Emmett C. Nave v. Paul K. Delo, Emmett C. Nave v. Paul K. Delo, Emmett C. Nave v. Paul K. Delo (1994)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 731-33 (Mo.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
Doyle J. Williams v. Bill Armontrout (1990)
In addition, the Missouri Supreme Court has affirmed a conviction for kidnapping that occurred in the context of an apparent attempted murder, see State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 731-33, 738-39 (Mo.1985) (en banc) (defendant’s foiled attempt to murder drug abuse counselor), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986), and in the context of a robbery-based felony murder to which the kidnapping was seemingly incidental, see State v. Mahaney, 625 S.W.2d …
green
State v. Black (2001)
This Court has affirmed sentences of death where the defendant *793 had a history of prior convictions similar to the defendant: State v. Amrine, 741 S.W.2d 665, 672 (Mo. banc 1987) (defendant had two prior serious assaultive felonies, for first degree robberies); State v. Reuscher, 827 S.W.2d 710, 715 (Mo. banc 1992) (defendant had four prior serious assaultive felonies, including second-degree assault and sodomy); State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 738 (Mo. banc 1985)(defendan…
defendant's aggravator was his prior serious assaultive felonies, including armed robbery and forcible rape
green
State v. Taylor (1997)
Id. citing State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Skillicorn (1997)
See, e.g., Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162, 173 , 106 S.Ct. 1758, 1764 , 90 L.Ed.2d 137 (1986); State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735-736 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Chambers (1995)
Id., citing State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Reuscher (1992)
See e.g., State v. Jones, 705 S.W.2d 19, 22 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 909 , 106 S.Ct. 3286 , 91 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986); State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 737 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Torrence (1991)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W. (2d) 729, 735 (Mo. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S. Ct. 1500 , 89 L.
green
State v. Schaal (1991)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Smith (1989)
However, reviewing further for plain error, see State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986), we find no manifest prejudice or miscarriage of justice resulting from denial of the continuance.
green
State v. Sandles (1987)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1985); State v. Williams, 652 S.W.2d 102, 108 (Mo. banc 1983).
green
State v. Harper (1986)
State v. Boliek, 706 S.W.2d 847, 849 [1] (Mo. banc 1986); State v. Malone, 694 S.W.2d 723, 726-727 [2] (Mo. banc 1985); State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735-736 [6] (Mo. banc 1985); State v. Bannister, 680 S.W.2d 141, 146 [12] (Mo. banc 1984); State v. Preston, 673 S.W.2d 1, 8-9 [19] (Mo. banc 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 893 , 105 S.Ct. 269 , 83 L.Ed.2d 205 (1984).
green
State v. Jones (1986)
See e.g., State v. Gilmore, 697 S.W.2d 172, 175 (Mo. banc 1985); State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735-36 (Mo. banc 1985); State v. Malone, 694 S.W.2d 723, 726-27 (Mo. banc 1985); State v. Kenley, 693 S.W.2d 79, 82 (Mo. banc 1985); State v. Johns, 679 S.W.2d 253, 265 (Mo. banc 1984).
green
Ronald Johnson v. State of Missouri (2019)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985); State v. Ervin, 835 S.W.2d 905, 921 (Mo. banc 1992).
green
Wood v. Commonwealth (2005)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 738 (Mo.1985).
green
State v. Dowell (2000)
Id. (citing State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985)).
green
State v. Hibler (2000)
Id. (citing State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985)).
green
State v. Santillan (1999)
Rule 29.11(d) states in pertinent part that “allegations of error to be preserved for appellate review must be included in a motion for new trial.” See also State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 734-735 (Mo.1985).
green
State v. Martin (1997)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 734 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Brown (1995)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Gregory (1992)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Williams (1992)
See Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162, 173 , 106 S.Ct. 1758, 1764 , 90 L.Ed.2d 137 (1986); State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735-736 [6] (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Johnson (1991)
A very strong showing is required to prove trial court abuse of discretion in denial of a motion for continuance, and the party requesting the continuance bears the burden of showing prejudice resulted by such denial. [Citations omitted.] State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985).
green
State v. Lachterman (1991)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986); State v. Brown, 762 S.W.2d 471, 475 (Mo.App.1988).
green
State v. Adams (1991)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 [4] (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Six (1991)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Sweet (1990)
The grant or denial of a motion for a continuance rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986), which will not be disturbed absent a strong showing of abuse, and the party which requested the continuance bears the burden of demonstrating prejudice resulting from the denial of such.
green
Endicott v. State (1990)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 [4] (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Morris (1990)
See, Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162, 165 , 106 S.Ct. 1758, 1760-61 , 90 L.Ed.2d 137 (1986); State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735-36 (Mo. banc 1985).
green
State v. Harris (1989)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Taylor (1989)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Oliver (1989)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986); State v. Richardson, 718 S.W.2d 170, 172 (Mo.App.1986).
green
Nave v. State (1988)
For the purpose of this appeal, we summarize the facts of movant’s crimes which are set out in detail in State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 731-733 (Mo. banc 1985).
green
State v. Mitchell (1988)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985).
green
State v. Crahan (1988)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Patterson (1987)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986); State v. Pollock, 735 S.W.2d 179, 181 (Mo.App.1987).
green
State v. Pollock (1987)
The decision of whether an application for continuance should be granted is within the broad discretion of the trial court, State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), and the court’s ruling on such application will not be disturbed unless it appears that the trial court acted capriciously or oppressively.
green
State v. Herron (1987)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986); State v. Richardson, 718 S.W.2d 170,172 (Mo.App.1986).
green
State v. Cooper (1987)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Skinner (1987)
See, Lockhard v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 , 106 S.Ct. 1758 , 90 L.Ed.2d 137 (1986); State v. Mathenia, 702 S.W.2d 840, 845 (Mo. banc 1986); State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735-736 (Mo. banc 1985); State v. Harper, 713 S.W.2d 7, 9 (Mo.App.1986).
green
State v. Peters (1987)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985).
green
State v. Wilson (1987)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985).
green
Darr v. State (1986)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).
green
State v. Richardson (1986)
State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735 (Mo. banc 1985); cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986); State v. Winston, 627 S.W.2d 915, 917-18 (Mo.App.1982).
green
State v. Rodden (1986)
State v. Mathenia, 702 S.W.2d 840, 844 [5] (Mo. banc 1986); State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735-36 [6] (Mo. banc 1985).
green
State v. Zeitvogel (1986)
We have repeatedly rejected similar constitutional challenges to “death qualification” of juries, see, e.g., State v. Jones, 705 S.W.2d 19, 23-24 (Mo. banc 1986); State v. Mathenia, 702 S.W.2d 840, 844 (Mo. banc 1986); State v. Foster, 700 S.W.2d 440, 443 (Mo. banc 1985); State v. Gilmore, 697 S.W.2d 172, 175 (Mo. banc 1985); State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729, 735-36 (Mo. banc 1985); State v. Malone, 694 S.W.2d 723, 726-27 (Mo. banc 1985); State v. Kenley, 693 S.W.2d 79, 82-83 (…
green
State v. Smith (1988)
See State v. Nave, 694 S.W.2d 729 (Mo. banc 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1500 , 89 L.Ed.2d 901 (1986).