How cited: Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz · Go Syfert

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz (1991)

green · 32 citation events across 16 courts. Showing the 18 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199120082026
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
FDIC v. McSweeney, 976 F.2d 532, 534 (9th Cir.1992) (“The FDIC may not ... revive claims for which the state limitations period has expired before the date of federal receivership.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993); FDIC v. Bancinsure, Inc., 770 F.Supp. 496, 499 (D.Minn.1991) (FIRREA may apply retroactively so long as the claim was not “stale” when filed); Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 920-22 (N.D.Ill.1991) (stale claims …
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
FDIC v. McSweeney, 976 F.2d 532, 534 (9th Cir.1992) ("The FDIC may not ... revive claims for which the state limitations period has expired before the date of federal receivership."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993); FDIC v. Bancinsure, Inc., 770 F.Supp. 496, 499 (D.Minn.1991) (FIRREA may apply retroactively so long as the claim was not "stale" when filed); Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 920-22 (N.D.Ill.1991) (stale cl…
Rule Authority · 7th Cir. · signal: cf.
Cf. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 923 (N.D.Ill.1991).
green Thweatt v. Jackson (1992)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Corp., 762 F.Supp. 905, 908-10 (D.Kan.1991); Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 920-22 (N.D.Ill.1991); FDIC v. House, 736 F.Supp. 1437, 1445-46 (S.D.Tex.1990).
Rule Authority · N.D. Okla.
Agency, Inc., 780 F.Supp. 745 (D.Kan.1991); FDIC v. Farris, 738 F.Supp. 444 (W.D.Okla.1989); FDIC v. Cocke, 7 F.3d 396 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied 513 U.S. 807 , 115 S.Ct. 53 , 130 L.Ed.2d 12 (1994); Randolph v. RTC, 995 F.2d 611 , 619 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1294 , 127 L.Ed.2d 647 (1994); FDIC v. Shrader & York, 991 F.2d 216, 220 (5th Cir.1993), cert. *1281 denied 512 U.S. 1219 , 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994); FDIC v. McSweeney, 976…
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
The analysis, however, is not so simple because “FIRREA canfnot] revive stale claims.” RTC v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 921 (N.D.Ill.1991).
Rule Authority · C.D. Ill.
See FDIC v. McSweeney, 976 F.2d 532, 534 (9th Cir.1992); RTC v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 920 (N.D.Ill. 1991).
green Jackson v. Thweatt (1994)
Rule Authority · Tex.
Co., 953 F.2d 478, 487 (9th Cir.1991); RTC v. Foley, 829 F.Supp. 352, 353 (D.N.M.1993); RTC v. Greenwood, 798 F.Supp. 1391, 1397 (D.Minn.1992); FDIC v. Schoenberger, 781 F.Supp. 1155, 1158 (E.D.La.1992); FDIC v. Bancinsure, Inc., 770 F.Supp. 496, 499 (D.Minn.1991); RTC v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 922 (N.D.Ill.1991); FDIC v. Howse, 736 F.Supp. 1437, 1446 (S.D.Tex.1990); Central States Resources Corp. v. First Nat.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Kan. 1991); Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz , 757 F. Supp. 915, 920-22 (N.D.
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Likewise, other districts which have addressed the issue under FIRREA have held that the federal limitations provisions apply only to claims that were still viable at the time of acquisition, see RTC v. International Insurance Co., 770 F.Supp. 300, 304 (E.D.La.1991) (“[C]ause of action ... is not revived by virtue of the [limitations] statute if the cause of action had already expired under state law by the time the government acquired the cause of action”); FDIC v. Schoenbe…
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 920-22 (N.D.Ill.1991), motion for reconsideration denied, 1991 WL 35514 (March 11, 1991); Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Howse, 736 F.Supp. 1437, 1445-46 (S.D.Tex.1990); but see Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, 742 F.Supp. 612, 615-16 (M.D.Fla.1990) (holding that FIRREA’s limitations provision does not apply retroactively).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
Randolph v. Resolution Trust Corp., 995 F.2d 611, 619 (5th Cir.1993); FDIC v. Regier Carr & Monroe, 996 F.2d 222, 225-26 (10th Cir.1993); FDIC v. Shrader & York, 991 F.2d 216, 220 (5th Cir.1993); FDIC v. McSweeney, 976 F.2d 532, 534 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993); see also Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 921 (N.D.Ill.1991) (reasoning that a literal reading of the statute would allow the FDIC to “revive claim…
green F.D.I.C. v. Dawson (1993)
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
Randolph v. Resolution Trust Corp., 995 F.2d 611, 619 (5th Cir.1993); FDIC v. Regier Carr & Monroe, 996 F.2d 222, 225-26 (10th Cir.1993); FDIC v. Shrader & York, 991 F.2d 216, 220 (5th Cir.1993); FDIC v. McSweeney, 976 F.2d 532, 534 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993); see also Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 921 (N.D.Ill.1991) (reasoning that a literal reading of the statute would allow the FDIC to "revive …
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 922 (N.D.Ill.1991).
green F.D.I.C. v. Belli (1993)
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 922 (N.D.Ill.1991).
Cited (see also) · N.D. Ill. · signal: see, e.g.
See e.g., RTC v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 921 (N.D.Ill.1991).
Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., RTC v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 921 (N.D.Ill.1991); RTC v. Interstate Fed.
Cited · E.D. La. · signal: see
See RTC v. Krantz, 757 F.Supp. 915, 921-22 (N.D.Ill.1991), adhered to on motion to reconsider, 1991 U.S. Dist.