Cluster 1663
green
· 89 citation events
across 17 courts.
Showing the 40 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201020182026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Lundstrom v. Romero (2010)
Najar, 451 F.3d at 718-19 ; compare Armijo, 601 F.3d at 1072 (“[I]f the officers acted reasonably, they need not exhaust every avenue of dispelling suspicion.
“[I]f the officers acted reasonably, they need not exhaust every avenue of dispelling suspicion. Perhaps more investigation would have been worthy. Then again, given the imminence of the threatened attacks, perhaps any delay would risk too much.”
green
Dalcour v. City of Lakewood (2012)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir.2010).
green
United States v. Creighton (2011)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1071 (10th Cir.2010).
green
United States v. Gordon (2014)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1075 (10th Cir.2010).
green
Bogan v. City of Chicago (2011)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir.2010).
green
Huff v. City of Burbank (2011)
See Michigan v. Fisher, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 546 , 175 L.Ed.2d 410 (2009) (describing the Brigham City holding as embodying the "emergency aid exception," requiring "only an objectively reasonable basis for believing that a person within the house is in need of immediate aid[.]" Id. at 548 (citations, alteration and internal quotation marks omitted)); see also United States v. Snipe, 515 F.3d 947 (9th Cir.2008) ("Considering the totality of the circumstances, law enforcem…
green
Springer v. Albin (2010)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir.2010) (quotation marks omitted); see also id. at 1074.
green
Springer v. Albin (2010)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir. 2010) -9- (quotation marks omitted); see also id. at 1074 .
green
Thomas v. Durastanti (2010)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1075 (10th Cir.2010) (the Fourth Amendment does not require officers to use the least restrictive means in investigating a threat).
green
Flores v. Henderson (2024)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1072 (10th Cir. 2010).
green
Lowther v. Children Youth and Family Department (2024)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir. 2010); see also Cortez, 478 F.3d at 1124 n.21 (noting that Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398 (2006), “did not expressly require probable cause” for there to be exigent circumstances).
green
United States v. Romero (2020)
Armijo v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1072 (10th Cir. 2010).
green
Stoedter v. Gates (2017)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1075 (10th Cir. 2010).
green
Callahan v. Unified Govt of Wyandotte (2015)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1067-68 (10th Cir.2010).
green
Attocknie Ex Rel. M.P. v. Smith (2015)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1071 (10th Cir.2010) (Fourth Amendment analysis focuses on the objective reasonableness of the challenged conduct in the totality of the circumstances).
green
United States v. Bodie Witzlib (2015)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1071-73 (10th Cir.2010); United States v. Lindsey, 877 F.2d 777, 781-82 (9th Cir.1989); United States v. Al-Azzawy, 784 F.2d 890, 894 (9th Cir.1985).
green
Hernandez v. Grant (2013)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir.2010) (internal quotation marks omitted).
green
Storey v. Garcia (2012)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1073 (10th Cir.2010).
green
Sandra Der v. Sean Connolly (2012)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir.2010) (stating, in the context of a § 1983 action, “[t]he officers bear the burden of establishing that the threats posed exigent circumstances justifying the warrantless entry”); Hardesty v. Hamburg Twp., 461 F.3d 646, 655 (6th Cir.2006) (concluding the government bears the burden of proving the presence of exigent circumstances justifying the warrantless entry); Parkhurst v. Trapp, 77 F.3d 707, 711 (3d Cir.1996) (“T…
green
Lobozzo v. Colorado Department of Corrections (2011)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir.2010), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1473 , 179 L.Ed.2d 313 (2011).
green
Langford v. Wyatt (2010)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir.2010) (“When a district court denies qualified immunity because of a factual dispute, that finding is not jurisdictionally dispositive on appeal if the defendants argue that immunity applies even under the plaintiffs version of the facts.”) (quotation marks omitted).
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1069-70 (10th Cir.2010).
green
Deutsch v. Jordan (2010)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir.2010).
green
Commonwealth v. Kaeppeler (2015)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1071 (10th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1224 7 requirement that compromises public safety and hampers law enforcement in fulfilling the purpose for which the emergency exception exists.
green
Kerns v. Board of Commissioners (2012)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1072 (10th Cir.2010)). 6.
green
James v. Chavez (2011)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1071 (10th Cir. 2010).
green
Fisher v. City of Fountain (2024)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1073 (10th Cir. 2010)).
green
Harris v. Barnes (2021)
The Objective Reasonableness Standard “The Fourth Amendment’s touchstone is reasonableness in the totality of the circumstances.” Armijo v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1071 (10th Cir. 2010).
green
William C. Huddleston v. Shannon Constantine, et al. (2026)
Doc. 44-6 at 6. 137 Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 374 (2007) (An “opponent must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts.”). 138 See Armijo v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1072 (10th Cir. 2010) (As long as police officers act reasonably, they “need not exhaust every avenue of dispelling suspicion” prior to detaining a suspect.). 139 See United States v. Webster, 314 F. Appx. 226, 229 (11th Cir. 2008) (“Although it might have been b…
As long as police officers act reasonably, they “need not exhaust every avenue of dispelling suspicion” prior to detaining a suspect.
green
Mosley v. Daves (2025)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir. 2010) (concluding that, in a § 1983 case, the officer bears the burden of establishing a warrant exception existed to justify a warrantless entry); Mascorro v. Billings, 656 F.3d 1198, 1205 (10th Cir. 2011) (In a § 1983 action, “[t]he burden is on the government to demonstrate the existence of exigent circumstances” justifying a warrantless entry.). ¶ 27 The Second, Third, Sixth, and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals a…
concluding that, in a § 1983 case, the officer bears the burden of establishing a warrant exception existed to justify a warrantless entry
Colo. 2019) (citing Mascorro, 656 F.3d at 1205 ; Lundstrom v. Romero, 616 F.3d 1108, 1124 (10th Cir. 2010); Armijo v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir. 2010)).
green
United States v. Taranto (2024)
Indeed, “[e]xigent circumstances are frequently found when dangerous explosives are involved.” Armijo v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1071 (10th Cir. 2010); see also United States v. Haldorson, 941 F.3d 284, 295 (7th Cir. 2019) (“The exigent circumstances exception is frequently invoked in cases involving explosives.”).
green
Cameron v. Wichita, City of (2023)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir. 2010) (quoting Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 , 393–94 (1978)). 34 Id. (quoting United States v. Najar, 451 F.3d 710, 718 (10th Cir. 2006)). 35 Id. (citing United States v. Reeves, 524 F.3d 1161, 1169 (10th Cir. 2008)).
quoting Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 , 393–94 (1978)
green
Williams v. City of Charlotte (2023)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1073 (10th Cir. 2010).
green
Lowther v. Children Youth and Families Department (2023)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir. 2010).
green
State of Iowa v. Brian De Arrie McGee (2021)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir. 2010) (“The officers bear the burden of establishing that the threats posed exigent circumstances justifying the warrantless entry.”); Hopkins v. Bonvicino, 573 F.3d 752, 764 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[A]s with other exceptions to the warrant requirement, the Government bears the burden of demonstrating that the search at issue meets the[] parameters.” (quoting United States v. Stafford, 416 F.3d 1068, 1074 (9th Cir. 2005)))…
“The officers bear the burden of establishing that the threats posed exigent circumstances justifying the warrantless entry.”
green
Smith v. City of Hobbs (2020)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir. 2010).
green
Lowther v. Children Youth and Families Department (2020)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1071 (10th Cir. 2010) (quoting Brigham City, 547 U.S. 398, 406 , 126 S. Ct. 1943, 1949 , 164 L.
green
United States v. Owen (2014)
Armijo Sanchez v. Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1072 (10th Cir.2010) (citing Walker, 474 F.3d at 1254).
green
People v. Troyer (2011)
(E.g., Wofford v. State (1997) 330 Ark. 8 [ 952 S.W.2d 646, 652 ]; People v. Allison (Colo. 2004) 86 P.3d 421, 427 ; State v. Fausel (2010) 295 Conn. 785 [ 993 A.2d 455, 461-462 ]; State v. Carlson, supra, 548 N.W.2d at p. 142 ; State v. Alexander (1998) 124 Md.App. 258 [ 721 A.2d 275, 286 ]; Hannon v. State (Nev. 2009) 207 P.3d 344, 346 ; Duquette v. Godbout (R.I. 1984) 471 A.2d 1359, 1362 ; State v. Deneui (2009) 2009 SD 99 [ 775 N.W.2d 221, 230 ]; State v. Comer (2002) 45…