How cited: Carlor Co. v. City of Miami · Go Syfert

Carlor Co. v. City of Miami (1953)

green · 34 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
195319892026
Rule Authority · Conn.
Gaudiani testified that, to her personal knowledge, parcel 4A was the “preferred” and more likely site for the museum. 103 The trial court began its analysis with the proposition that, “it is not necessary that the officials proceed to make immediate use of the property thus acquired, or that they have ‘plans and specifications prepared and all other preparations necessary for immediate construction before it [the county] can determine the necessity for taking private proper…
Rule Authority · Fla.
We held that "there is no reversion where the fee simple title is taken and there is either a failure to use or a discontinuance of the use which impelled the taking." 62 So.2d at 900 (citations omitted).
citations omitted
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
In Carlor Company, Inc. v. City of Miami, 62 So.2d 897, 902 (Fla. 1953), the supreme court stated: It is the duty of public officials to look to the future and plan for the future.
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
As stated in Carlor Co. v. City of Miami, 62 So.2d 897, 900 (Fla. 1953), it is elementary that a condemnation judgment or award cannot be collaterally attacked except where there is fraud or where the judgment is void for want of jurisdiction.
Rule Authority · Haw.
The Supreme Court of Florida made some pertinent observations in the Carlor case: “* * * It is not necessary that a political subdivision of the state have money on hand, plans and specifications px’epared and all other preparations necessary for immediate construction before it can determine the necessity for taking private px*opex*ty for a public purpose. “* * * It is the duty of public officials to look to the future and plan for the future. * * * The hands of public offi…
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Carlor Co., Inc. v. City of Miami, 62 So.2d 897 (Fla.1953). .
Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Carlor v. City of Miami, 62 So.2d 897 (Fla.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 821 , 74 S.Ct. 37 , 98 L.Ed. 347 (1953) (in condemnation suit, where petition sought a fee simple interest, order of taking granted a fee simple interest, and final judgment awarded a fee simple interest, failure of resolution to specify interest in land sought to be acquired did not go to jurisdiction and "when the original petition in eminent domain was filed, the circuit court acquired complet…
Cited · Fla. · signal: see
See Carlor Co. v. City of Miami (Fla.) 62 So.2d 897 , wherein this Court, in approving condemnation of lands for future public use said: "It is the duty of public officials to look to the future and plan for the future. *341 In erecting public buildings and public improvements, it is likewise the duty of public officials to build and plan not only for the present but for the foreseeable future." Text 902.
green State v. Chang (1963)
Cited · Haw. · signal: see
See Carlor Co. v. City of Miami, 62 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 821 , 74 S. Ct. 37 , 98 L.
Cited · Fla. · signal: see
See Carlor Co., Inc., v. City of Miami, Fla.1953, 62 So.2d 897 , certiorari denied 346 U.S. 821 , 74 S.Ct. 37 , 98 L.Ed. 347 .