Carlor Co. v. City of Miami (1953)
green
· 34 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
195319892026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Kelo v. City of New London (2004)
Gaudiani testified that, to her personal knowledge, parcel 4A was the “preferred” and more likely site for the museum. 103 The trial court began its analysis with the proposition that, “it is not necessary that the officials proceed to make immediate use of the property thus acquired, or that they have ‘plans and specifications prepared and all other preparations necessary for immediate construction before it [the county] can determine the necessity for taking private proper…
green
Mainer v. Canal Authority of State (1985)
We held that "there is no reversion where the fee simple title is taken and there is either a failure to use or a discontinuance of the use which impelled the taking." 62 So.2d at 900 (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green
JC Vereen & Sons, Inc. v. City of Miami (1981)
In Carlor Company, Inc. v. City of Miami, 62 So.2d 897, 902 (Fla. 1953), the supreme court stated: It is the duty of public officials to look to the future and plan for the future.
green
City of Miami v. Coconut Grove Marine Prop., Inc. (1978)
As stated in Carlor Co. v. City of Miami, 62 So.2d 897, 900 (Fla. 1953), it is elementary that a condemnation judgment or award cannot be collaterally attacked except where there is fraud or where the judgment is void for want of jurisdiction.
green
City & County of Honolulu v. Bishop Trust Co. (1966)
The Supreme Court of Florida made some pertinent observations in the Carlor case: “* * * It is not necessary that a political subdivision of the state have money on hand, plans and specifications px’epared and all other preparations necessary for immediate construction before it can determine the necessity for taking private px*opex*ty for a public purpose. “* * * It is the duty of public officials to look to the future and plan for the future. * * * The hands of public offi…
green
Canal Authority v. Mainer (1983)
See Carlor Co., Inc. v. City of Miami, 62 So.2d 897 (Fla.1953). .
green
Fla. Power & Light Co. v. CANAL AUTHORITY, ETC. (1982)
See, e.g., Carlor v. City of Miami, 62 So.2d 897 (Fla.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 821 , 74 S.Ct. 37 , 98 L.Ed. 347 (1953) (in condemnation suit, where petition sought a fee simple interest, order of taking granted a fee simple interest, and final judgment awarded a fee simple interest, failure of resolution to specify interest in land sought to be acquired did not go to jurisdiction and "when the original petition in eminent domain was filed, the circuit court acquired complet…
green
Ball v. City of Tallahassee (1973)
See Carlor Co. v. City of Miami (Fla.) 62 So.2d 897 , wherein this Court, in approving condemnation of lands for future public use said: "It is the duty of public officials to look to the future and plan for the future. *341 In erecting public buildings and public improvements, it is likewise the duty of public officials to build and plan not only for the present but for the foreseeable future." Text 902.
green
State v. Chang (1963)
See Carlor Co. v. City of Miami, 62 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 821 , 74 S. Ct. 37 , 98 L.
green
State v. Florida Development Commission (1957)
See Carlor Co., Inc., v. City of Miami, Fla.1953, 62 So.2d 897 , certiorari denied 346 U.S. 821 , 74 S.Ct. 37 , 98 L.Ed. 347 .