Boothe v. State (1971)
green
· 95 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 21 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197219992026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Leday v. State (1998)
See, Gordon v. State, 651 S.W.2d 793, 793 (Tex.Cr.App.1983); Brown v. State, 617 S.W.2d 234 (Tex.Cr.App.1981); Reeves v. State, 566 S.W.2d 630, 633 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Dugger v. State, 543 S.W.2d 374, 377 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); Hunnicutt v. State, 531 S.W.2d 618, 622 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); Garcia v. State, 522 S.W.2d 203, 205 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); McKenzie v. State, 487 S.W.2d 65, 66 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Sheridan v. State, 485 S.W.2d 920, 921 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Palmer v. State, 475 S.W.2d…
green
in the Matter of Z.R., a Child (2013)
See Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex. Crim.
“The testimony from these experienced officers in the 9 narcotics division that the substance found in the building and in the automobile appeared to them to be marihuana was sufficient for the jury to determine that it was marihuana.”
green
Jacobson, Jonathan (2013)
Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex.Crim.App.1971).
green
Herbert v. State (1992)
Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex.Crim.App.1971).
green
Winter v. State (1986)
The reason for including evidence from the punishment stage in deciding if the evidence is sufficient was cogently stated in Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex.Crim.App.1971): It would be an exercise in futility to reverse such a case for insufficient evidence when the testimony of the appellant [at the punishment stage] can be used against him on a retrial.
green
Tavario Jermaine Smith v. State (2020)
App. 1977) (noting that “[t]his Court has held that an experienced officer may be qualified to testify that a certain green leafy plant substance is mari[j]uana.”); Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex. Crim.
“The testimony of these experienced officers in the narcotics division that the substance found in the building and in the automobile appeared to them to be mari[j]uana was sufficient for the jury to determine that it was mari[j]uana.”
green
Tavario Jermaine Smith v. State (2020)
App. 1977) (noting that “[t]his Court has held that an experienced officer may be qualified to testify that a certain green leafy plant substance is mari[j]uana.”); Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex. Crim.
“The testimony of these experienced officers in the narcotics division that the substance found in the building and in the automobile appeared to them to be mari[j]uana was sufficient for the jury to determine that it was mari[j]uana.”
green
Ex parte Roberts (2016)
See Osbourn v. State, 92 S.W.3d 531, 537-39 (Tex.Crim.App.2002); Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex.Crim.App.1971).
green
Ricardo Ramirez v. State (2015)
App. 1976) (officer’s testimony that the cigar box contained marihuana was sufficient to establish that the substance found in the cigar box was marihuana); Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex. Crim.
held testimony of two experienced narcotics officers that the substance found appeared to them to be marihuana was sufficient for the jury to determine that it was marihuana
green
Rene Rushell Rivera v. State (2015)
App. 1976) (officer’s testimony that the cigar box contained marihuana was sufficient to establish that the substance found in the cigar box was marihuana); Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex. Crim.
holding that the testimony of two experienced narcotics officers that the substance found appeared to them to be marihuana was sufficient for the jury to determine that it was marihuana
green
Jacobson, Jonathan (2013)
App. 1995). 16 Id. at 188 . 17 Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex. Crim.
green
$7,058.84 in U.S. Currency v. State (2000)
Fierro v. State, 706 S.W.2d 310, 318 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); Houlihan v. State, 551 S.W.2d 719, 724 (Tex.Crim.App.1977); Jordan v. State, 486 S.W.2d 784, 785 (Tex.Crim.App.1972); Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex.Crim.App.1971), overruled on other grounds, Leday v. State, 983 S.W.2d 713, 721 (Tex.Crim.App.1998); Satery v. State, 455 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Tex.Crim.App.1970); Miller v. State, 168 Tex.Crim. 570 , 330 S.W.2d 466, 468 (1959); Hernandez v. State, 137 Tex.Crim. 343…
green
Hoffman v. State (1996)
McGlothlin v. State, 896 S.W.2d 183, 186 (Tex.Crim.App.1995); DeGarmo v. State, 691 S.W.2d 657, 661 (Tex.Crim.App.1985); Lasker v. State, 573 S.W.2d 539, 543 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978); Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex.Crim.App.1972).
green
Jeffrey Stephanoff v. State (1993)
App.), cert. denied , 434 U.S. 955 (1977); Boothe v. State , 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex. Crim.
green
Garcia v. State (1986)
Gordon v. State, 651 S.W.2d 793, 793 (Tex.Crim.App.1983); Reev es v. State, 566 S.W.2d 630, 633 (Tex.Crim.App.1978); Dugger v. State, 543 S.W.2d 374, 377 (Tex.Crim.App.1976); Hunnicutt v. State, 531 S.W.2d 618, 622 (Tex.Crim.App.1976); Garcia v. State, 522 S.W.2d 203, 205 (Tex.Crim.App.1975); McKenzie v. State, 487 S.W.2d 65, 66 (Tex.Crim.App.1972); Sheridan v. State, 485 S.W.2d 920, 921 (Tex.Crim.App.1972); Palmer v. State, 475 S.W.2d 797, 798 (Tex.Crim.App.1972); Mullane v…
green
Dugger v. State (1976)
Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex.Crim.App.1971).
green
Amaziah Thompkins v. State (2013)
See Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tex. Crim.
green
Jones v. State (1976)
See and cf. Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Garcia v. State, 522 S.W.2d 203 (Tex.Cr.App.1975).
green
Paredes v. State (1973)
See Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219 (Tex.Cr.App. 1971); Forderson v. State, 467 S.W.2d 476 (Tex.Cr.App. 1971).
green
Sheridan v. State (1972)
See also Boothe v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 474 S.W.2d 219 ; Richardson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 458 S.W.2d 665 .
green
Evans v. State (1972)
See Boothe v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 474 S.W.2d 219 ; Richardson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 458 S.W.2d 665 .