How cited: Danks v. Holland · Go Syfert

Danks v. Holland (1976)

green · 36 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 14 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197720012026
green Axtmann v. Chillemi (2007)
Rule Authority · N.D. · 2 citations in this opinion
Corp. v. Morque, 372 N.W.2d 872, 876 (N.D.1985) [(]corporate entity “may be disregarded to avoid injustice.”[)]; Danks v. Holland, [ 246 N.W.2d 86, 90 (N.D.1976)], [(]no showing of “flagrant wrongdoing” sufficient to pierce corporate veil[)]; Fire Ass’n of Philadelphia v. Vantine Paint & Glass Co., 133 N.W.2d 426, 432 (N.D.1965) [Qnothing “unfair or fraudulent” in the conduct of corporations or individuals, nor was it shown that corporations were “used as a cover for the oth…
Rule Authority · R.I. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Stewart v. American International Oil & Gas Co., 845 F.2d 196, 200 (9th Cir.1988) (court did not err in dismissing third-party complaint where there was no derivative or secondary liability alleged in the complaint); U.S. General, Inc. v. City of Joliet, 598 F.2d 1050, 1053 (7th Cir.1979) (“plain condition on the face of [Fed.R.Civ.P.] 14” was not met where “there was no claim that any one of the additional parties would be secondarily liable”); Gabbidon v. King, 414 Mas…
Rule Authority · S.D. · 2 citations in this opinion
Dangerud v. Dobesh, 353 N.W.2d 328 , 331 n. 2 (N.D.1984); Hilzendager v. Skwarok, 335 N.W.2d 768, 774 (N.D.1983); Danks v. Holland, 246 N.W.2d 86, 90 (N.D.1976).
green Jablonsky v. Klemm (1985)
Rule Authority · N.D. · 2 citations in this opinion
Danks v. Holland, 246 N.W.2d 86, 90 (N.D.1976).
green Dangerud v. Dobesh (1984)
Rule Authority · N.D. · 2 citations in this opinion
"It is a commonplace that officers and directors are not personally liable for the ordinary debts of a corporation in the absence of fraud, other recognized extraordinary circumstances, or specific statutory provision imposing liability.” Banks v. Holland, 246 N.W.2d 86, 90 (N.D.1976).
Rule Authority · N.D.
Such liability may only be imposed if there has been “fraud, other recognized extraordinary circumstances, or specific 'statutory provision imposing liability.” Danks v. Holland, 246 N.W.2d 86, 90 (N.D.1976).
Rule Authority · Bankr. D.N.D.
Danks v. Holland, 246 N.W.2d 86, 90 (N.D.1976).
Rule Authority · N.D.
See Reiling v. Bhattacharyya, 270 N.W.2d 562, 564 (N.D.1978); Danks v. Holland, 246 N.W.2d 86, 90 (N.D.1976).
Rule Authority · N.D.
See Allen v. White Drug of Minot, Inc., 346 N.W.2d 279, 282 (N.D.1984); Danks v. Holland, 246 N.W.2d 86, 88 (N.D.1976).
green Mitchell v. Preusse (1984)
Rule Authority · N.D.
Danks v. Holland, 246 N.W.2d 86, 91 (N.D.1976); see also Schnitker v. Schnitker, 646 S.W.2d 123, 126 (Mo.App.1983); Reid v. United States, 715 F.2d 1148, 1154 (7 Cir.1983).
green Hilzendager v. Skwarok (1983)
Rule Authority · N.D.
Danks v. Holland, 246 N.W.2d 86, 90 (N.D.1976).
Rule Authority · N.D.
As we have stated, “we would deplore any tendency to request a finding of frivolity in any appeals except those flagrantly groundless .... ” Danks v. Holland, 246 N.W.2d 86, 91 (N.D.1976).
green Freitag v. Freitag (1982)
Rule Authority · N.D.
In Danks v. Holland, 246 N.W.2d 86, 91 (N.D.1976), we said that “. . . we would deplore any tendency to request a finding of frivolity in any appeals except those flagrantly groundless .... ” Chances of reversal of a judgment when the appeal attacks findings of fact made by a trial judge, or attacks a verdict of a jury, are rightfully slim.
green Blue Arm v. Volk (1977)
Cited · N.D. · signal: see
See Danks v. Holland, 246 N.W.2d 86, 91 (N.D.1976).