How cited: Gaynor v. Washington University · Go Syfert

Gaynor v. Washington University (2008)

green · 13 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · D. Mass. · 2 citations in this opinion
A month and a half before Sides was published, the Missouri Court of Appeals offered an interpretation of Budding , stating that "section 53.8.225.1 did not exempt from its affidavit requirement a medical malpractice case that does not require proof of the standard of care by expert opinion.” Gaynor v. Washington Univ., 261 S.W.3d 650, 654 (Mo.Ct.App.2008).
Rule Authority · Mo. · 2 citations in this opinion
Under those cases, the resolution of the issue of whether a party must file a health care affidavit depends on whether "the relationship of the parties is that of health *332 care provider and recipient and if the `true claim' relates only to the provision of health care services." Gaynor v. Washington Univ., 261 S.W.3d 650, 653 (Mo. App.2008) (internal citations omitted).
green J.K.M. v. Dempsey (2010)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Gaynor v. Washington Univ., 261 S.W.3d at 652-53 (Mo.App.
Mo.App. E.D.2008
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
"When, after a statute has been construed by a court of last resort, the legislature re-enacts it, carries it over without change, or re-incorporates the exact language previously construed, we presume that the legislature knew of and adopted the judicial construction given to that language.” Gaynor v. Washington Univ., 261 S.W.3d 650, 653-54 (Mo.App.