Martin v. Adams, Et Ux. (1953)
green
· 71 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 14 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
195419902026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Estate of Dykes v. Estate of Williams (2003)
Martin v. Adams, 216 Miss. 270 , 62 So.2d 328, 329 (1953).
green
Lagniappe Logistics, Inc. v. Scott M. Buras (2016)
Id. at 1054-55 (citing Martin v. Adams, 216 Miss. 270 , 62 So.2d 328, 329 (1953)). .
green
Ginger Dykes Williams v. Kathryn F. Tonguis (2002)
Martin v. Adams, 216 Miss. 270 , 62 So.2d 328, 329 (1953).
green
Long Meadow Homeowners' Ass'n v. Harland (2011)
Martin v. Adams, 216 Miss. 270, 277 , 62 So.2d 328, 329 (1953). ¶ 24.
green
Phillip Morrow v. Ronald Morrow (2006)
The chancery court found that Section 89-5-13 acted “to put a seal upon the validity of those acknowledgments and no one can complain of them, not that anybody has . . . ” We agree with the chancellor that a “properly acknowledged deed is presumptively authentic . . . ,” 13 but that presumption is not conclusive and does not result in a finding that “no one can complain of.” Indeed, it is a presumption that can be rebutted.14 The question at issue here 8 Id. at 1054-55 (cita…
green
In Re Estate of Hardy (2005)
Martin v. Adams, 216 Miss. 270 , 62 So.2d 328, 329 (1953).
green
Seay v. Seay (2005)
Martin v. Adams, 216 Miss. 270 , 62 So.2d 328, 329 (1953).
green
Morgan v. Lawrence (2005)
The law is clear that in order “[f]or a deed to be valid in Mississippi, the grantor must deliver it to the grantee.” Estate of Dykes, 864 So.2d at 930 ¶ 10 (citing Martin v. Adams, 216 Miss. 270 , 62 So.2d 328, 329 (1953)).
green
Everett v. Everett (2005)
“For a deed to be valid in Mississippi, the grantor must deliver it to the grantee.” Estate of Dykes, 864 So.2d at 930 (¶ 10) (citing Martin v. Adams, 216 Miss. 270, 277 , 62 So.2d 328, 329 (1953)).
green
In Re Estate of Hardy (2002)
Martin v. Adams, 216 Miss. 270 , 62 So.2d 328, 329 (1953).
green
Seay v. Seay (2002)
Martin v. Adams, 216 Miss. 270 , 62 So.2d 328, 329 (1953).
green
Maynette Seay v. James Seay (2000)
Martin v. Adams, 216 Miss. 270 , 62 So. 2d 328, 329 (1953).
green
Hans v. Hans (1986)
However, in Martin v. Adams, 216 Miss. 270 , 62 So.2d 328, 329 (1953), we find, "... while the recordation of a deed raises a presumption of its delivery, this presumption yields to the proof that the deed was never delivered." Faced with these two presumptions and the conflicting evidence offered by the parties in an effort to overcome them, we cannot say that in finding that the appellees had overcome the presumption of non-delivery and that the appellant had failed to ove…
green
Arwe v. White (1977)
Tiffany, supra § 1061; see Martin v. Adams, 216 Miss. 270, 277 , 62 So. 2d 328, 329 (1953); Smith v. Black, 143 Neb. 244, 250-52 , 9 N.W.2d 193, 197-98 (1943).