Ex Parte Myrick (1971)
green
· 32 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 18 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197319992026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Eichelberger v. Eichelberger (1979)
NOTES [1] Texas courts have recognized or utilized their inherent powers in the following instances: to change, set aside or otherwise control their judgments, A. F. Jones & Sons v. Republic Supply Co., 151 Tex. 90 , 246 S.W.2d 853 (1952); Nevitt v. Wilson, 116 Tex. 29 , 285 S.W. 1079 (1926); Townes v. Lattimore, 114 Tex. 511 , 272 S.W. 435 (1925); In re House Bill 537, 113 Tex. 367 , 256 S.W. 573 (1923); Coleman v. Zapp, 105 Tex. 491 , 151 S.W. 1040, 1041 (1912); Cohen v. M…
green
in Re Richard A. Bielefeld (2004)
App.—Texarkana 1980, orig. proceeding) (holding contempt order void where it was unclear whether judgment was for attorney’s fees attributable to enforcement of child support or visitation); Ex parte Myrick , 474 S.W.2d 767, 772 (Tex. Civ.
green
In Re Bielefeld (2004)
Bank, 113 Tex. 337 , 255 S.W. 1097, 1104 (1923)) (holding attorney’s fees incurred for enforcing child custody order not enforceable by contempt); see also Ex parte Dolenz, 893 S.W.2d 677, 681 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1995, orig. proceeding) (holding recovery of discovery costs not permitted as “debt”); Ex parte Rosser, 899 S.W.2d 382, 386 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1995, orig. proceeding) (holding order for attorney’s fees and costs incurred in enforcing visitation not enforcea…
green
in Re Richard A. Bielefeld (2004)
App.—Texarkana 1980, orig. proceeding) (holding contempt order void where it was unclear whether judgment was for attorney’s fees attributable to enforcement of child support or visitation); Ex parte Myrick , 474 S.W.2d 767, 772 (Tex. Civ.
green
In Re Moers (2003)
Ex parte Myrick, 474 S.W.2d 767, 772 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1971, orig. proceeding).
green
in the Interest of Robert Westergaard Moers, Jr., Lindsey Elizabeth Moers, and Conrad Dielman Mores (2003)
Ex parte Myrick , 474 S.W.2d 767, 772 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1971, orig. proceeding).
green
in Re: Charles T. Patillo (2000)
See Ex parte Hudson , 917 S.W.2d 24 , 2627 (Tex. 1996); Ex parte Carey , 704 S.W.2d 13, 14 (Tex. 1986); Ex parte Ramzy , 424 S.W.2d 220, 225-26 (Tex. 1968); In re Aarons , 10 S.W.3d 833, 834 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 2000, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Arnold , 926 S.W.2d 622, 625 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 1996, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Balderas , 804 S.W.2d 261, 264 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Linder , 783 S.W.2d 754, 758 (Tex. App.--Dallas 199…
green
In Re Patillo (2000)
See Ex parte Hudson, 917 S.W.2d 24, 26-27 (Tex.1996); Ex parte Carey, 704 S.W.2d 13, 14 (Tex.1986); Ex parte Ramzy, 424 S.W.2d 220, 225-26 (Tex.1968); In re Aarons, 10 S.W.3d 833, 834 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 2000, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Arnold, 926 S.W.2d 622, 625 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1996, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Balderas, 804 S.W.2d 261, 264 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Linder, 783 S.W.2d 754, 758 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1990, orig. proceeding…
green
Ex parte Arnold (1996)
See also Ex parte Conoly, 732 S.W.2d 695, 699 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1987, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Myrick, 474 S.W.2d 767, 771 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1971, orig. proceeding).
green
Ex Parte Tanner (1995)
See Ex parte Payne, 598 S.W.2d 312, 320 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1980, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Myrick, 474 S.W.2d 767, 772 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st.
green
Greiner v. Jameson (1993)
See Young, 810 S.W.2d at 851 (clarification order on the appointment of a receiver); Various Opportunities, Inc. v. Sullivan Invs., Inc., 677 S.W.2d 115, 116 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1984, no writ) (specific performance of a contract incorporated into a judgment); Reynolds, 635 S.W.2d at 846 (extension of time for specific performance of a real estate contract); Ex parte Myrick, 474 S.W.2d 767, 768 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1971, orig. proceeding) (judgment of contempt with …
green
Ex Parte Quevedo (1981)
Ex Parte Payne, 598 S.W.2d 312, 320 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1980, no writ); Karten v. Snyder, 597 S.W.2d 561, 562 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth 1980, no writ); Ex Parte McManus, supra, at 792; Ex Parte Myrick, 474 S.W.2d 767, 771 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1972, no writ); Rule 308-A, T.R.C.P. “...
green
Ex Parte Prevost (1979)
Ex parte Werner, 496 S.W.2d 121, 122 (Tex.Civ.App.— San Antonio 1973, original proceedings); Ex parte Myrick, 474 S.W.2d 767, 772 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1971, original proceedings).
green
Ex Parte Choate (1979)
Again, as noted earlier, the command is imprecise and vague — and, more importantly, void. *628 Ex parte Myrick, 474 S.W.2d 767, 769 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1971, original proceedings), found the court holding void an order of commitment for failure to “execute all notes and instruments, to carry this agreement into full force and effect” by the refusal to execute a specific trust agreement.
green
Ex Parte Werner (1973)
In Ex parte Myrick, 474 S.W.2d 767, 772 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1972, no writ) ; the Court said: “Since relator would be deprived of his liberty without due process of law if he is held in custody by reason of his refusal to pay the attorney’s fee, that portion of the order must be held unenforceable.”
green
Ex Parte Rogers (1982)
Id. at 188; see Ex parte Myrick, 474 S.W.2d 767, 771-72 (Tex. Civ.App. Houston [1st Dist.] 1971, no writ).
green
Ex Parte Hightower (1994)
See Ex parte Myrick, 474 S.W.2d 767, 772 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1971, orig. proceeding).
green
Ex Parte McManus (1979)
Id. at 486 , 259 S.W.2d at 188 ; see Ex parte Myrick, 474 S.W.2d 767, 771-72 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1971, no writ).