Elliott v. Chrysler Financial (2005)
green
· 9 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Spikes v. Car Toys, Inc. (2024)
P. 12(b)(1)) (citing Elliot v. Chrysler Fin., 149 F. App’x 766, 768-69 (10th Cir. 2005) (unpublished); West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988)).
unpublished
green
Robinson v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC. (2024)
See Elliott v. Chrysler Fin., 149 F. App’x 766, 769 (10th Cir. 2005) (“The district court also considered the possibility of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 , but correctly found jurisdiction lacking because the complaint failed to allege jurisdictional facts.”); Joplin v. Capstone Real Est.
“The district court also considered the possibility of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 , but correctly found jurisdiction lacking because the complaint failed to allege jurisdictional facts.”
green
Bovo v. Arapahoe County Sheriff's Office (2022)
“To establish subject matter jurisdiction under § 1343, the plaintiff must show that the defendant acted ‘under color of any state law.’” Elliott v. Chrysler Fin., 149 F. App’x 766, 768 (10th Cir. 2005) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (a)(3)).
quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (a)(3)
green
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Ryan (2010)
(C.A.10, 2005), 149 Fed.Appx. 766, 768 (“Merely following a procedure established by state law does not transform a private party’s activity into state action”); Pahls v. Kesselring (C.A.6, 2000), 230 F.3d 1359 (table) (“simply invoking the authority of a valid state law does not amount to state action for § 1983 purposes”).
green
Mehdipour v. Matthews, Jr. (2010)
See Elliott v. Chrysler Fin., 149 Fed.Appx. 766, 768-69 (10th Cir.2005); see also Monks v. Hetherington, 573 F.2d 1164, 1167 (10th Cir.1978) ("There is no demonstration of state action and, therefore, no basis for civil rights jurisdiction [pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (3) ] in the case at bar.”).
See Elliot v. Chrysler Financial, 149 F. App’x 766 (10th Cir. 2005) (discussing jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ). and applications (id. at 23, 40-47, 56, 66-68, 97-98); filings from an administrative proceeding (id. at 58-59, 61-62, 70-72, 75-76, 78-80); and what appears to be correspondence.
discussing jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983
green
McLinn v. Thomas County Sheriff's Department (2021)
See Elliott v. Chrysler Fin., 149 F. App’x 766, 768 (10th Cir. 2005).
green
Matthews v. Kofol (2020)
See Elliott v. Chrysler Fin., 149 F. App’x 766, 767-68 (10th Cir. 2005) (unpublished).
unpublished