How cited: Gruenhagen v. Larson · Go Syfert

Gruenhagen v. Larson (1976)

green · 304 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 50
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197720012026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green James Bigham v. Dale W. Kleve (2015)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · 5 citations in this opinion
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976). 1.
green U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. (2010)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
ANALYSIS “In the absence of a motion for a new trial, our scope of review includes substantive legal issues properly raised to and considered by the district court, whether the evidence supports the findings of fact, and whether those findings support the conclusions of law and the judgment.” Baker v. Baker, 733 N.W.2d 815, 819 (Minn.App.2007) (citing Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of Minn., 664 N.W.2d 303, 310 (Minn.2003); Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 …
green Marriage of Baker v. Baker (2007)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of Minn., 664 N.W.2d 303, 310 (Minn. 2003) (stating that new-trial motion is not prerequisite to appellate review of substantive legal issues properly raised and considered in district court); Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976) (stating that absent motion for new trial, appellate courts may review whether evidence supports findings of fact and whether findings support conclusions of la…
stating that absent motion for new trial, appellate courts may review whether evidence supports findings of fact and whether findings support conclusions of law and judgment
green State Ex Rel. Andersen v. Reward Corp. (1992)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Brooks v. Doherty, Rumble & Butler (1992)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc. (1990)
Rule Authority · Minn. · 2 citations in this opinion
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Marriage of Erickson v. Erickson (1989)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Marriage of Joneja v. Joneja (1988)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Examining the trial court's exercise of discretion, we must decide "whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such findings sustain the conclusions of law and the judgment." Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Marriage of Griffith v. Griffith (1987)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London (1987)
Rule Authority · Minn. · 2 citations in this opinion
To this end, there are various rules and principles governing appellate practice, such as the requirements for preserving error below for appellate review, e.g., Minn.R.Civ.P. 51; the rule that parties may be bound on appeal by the theories on which the case was tried below, see, e.g., Annis v. Annis, 250 Minn. 256, 263 , 84 N.W.2d 256, 261 (1957); the rule that an appellate court will not ordinarily consider an issue not first presented to the trial court, Gruenhagen v. Lar…
green Thompson v. Kromhout (1987)
Quote Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 568 (1976) (“assignments of error which have not been presented to the trial court for consideration will not be reviewed on appeal”).
“assignments of error which have not been presented to the trial court for consideration will not be reviewed on appeal”
green Norwest Bank Minneapolis v. Rutledge (1987)
Quote Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 457 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 568 (1976) (“assignments of error which have not been presented to the trial court for consideration will not be reviewed on appeal”)..
“assignments of error which have not been presented to the trial court for consideration will not be reviewed on appeal”
green Hunter Daniel Hanlon v. Commissioner of Public Safety (2015)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Thus, even if the argument had been properly asserted in his appellate brief, we would not consider the possibility of a remand because our review would be limited to “whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact, and whether the findings sustain the conclusions of law and the judgment.” See U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 802 N.W.2d 363, 370 (Minn. 2011) (citing Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976)); see also Hartman v. Blan…
green Bobbie Teeple v. Estate of Dylan Cox (2015)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Kaytee Hooser v. Keith Anderson (2015)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Because he did not file a motion for new trial, our review is limited to substantive legal issues properly raised in and considered by the district court, whether the evidence supports the findings of fact, and whether those findings support the conclusions of law and judgment.1 Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of Minn., 664 N.W.2d 303 , 308–310 (Minn. 2003); Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green In re the Marriage of: Helen Kernik v. James Kernik, Judith Murphy (2014)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of Minn., 664 N.W.2d 303, 311 (Minn. 2003) (stating that a new-trial motion is not a prerequisite to appellate review of substantive legal issues properly raised and considered in district court); Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976) (stating that absent a motion for new trial, appellate courts may review whether evidence supports findings of fact and whether findings support conclusions…
stating that absent a motion for new trial, appellate courts may review whether evidence supports findings of fact and whether findings support conclusions of law and judgment
green Moen v. Sunstone Hotel Properties, Inc. (2012)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
As a result of its holding, the supreme court in Rubey remanded to this court “for review of the underlying judgment on appeal as though no new trial/amended findings motion had been made and review to determine ‘whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such findings sustain the conclusions of law and the judgment.’ ” 714 N.W.2d at 425 (quoting Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976)).
green Frazier v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. (2012)
Rule Authority · Minn.
Finally, the newly discovered evidence “must not be merely collateral, impeaching, or cumulative, but rather, must be such as to have a probable effect upon the result of a new trial.” Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 459 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. (2011)
Rule Authority · Minn.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976); Meiners v. Kennedy, 221 Minn. 6, 8 , 20 N.W.2d 539, 540 (1945); Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53, 54 , 224 N.W. 461, 462 (1929).
green City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'n (2011)
Rule Authority
See Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of Minn., 664 N.W.2d 303, 309-10 (Minn.2003) (stating that new-trial motion is not prerequisite to appellate review of substantive legal issues properly raised and considered in district court); Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976) (stating that absent motion for new trial, appellate courts may review whether evidence supports findings of fact and whether findings support conclusions…
stating that absent motion for new trial, appellate courts may review whether evidence supports findings of fact and whether findings support conclusions of law and judgment
green Pillandco, Inc. v. State (2006)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
ANALYSIS On appeal from a judgment where there has been no motion for a new trial, appellate review is limited to “whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such findings sustain the conclusions of law and the judgment.” Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Marriage of Rubey v. Vannett (2006)
Rule Authority · Minn.
We, therefore, remand this case to the court of appeals for review of the underlying judgment as though no new trial/amended findings motion had been made and review to determine “whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such findings sustain the conclusions of law and the judgment.” Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Rainforest Cafe, Inc. v. State Investment Board (2004)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
ANALYSIS On appeal from a judgment where there has been no motion for a new trial, appellate review is limited to “whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such findings sustain the conclusions of law and the judgment.” Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of Minnesota (2003)
Rule Authority · Minn.
Aug.13, 2002) (quoting Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976)).
green New Horizon Enterprises, Inc. v. Contemporary Closet Design, Inc. (1997)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Phong Thi Doan v. Medtronic, Inc. (1997)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
When a party appeals from a judgment without having made a motion for a new trial, “the only questions for review are whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such findings sustain the conclusions of law and the judgment.” Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 525 N.W.2d 592, 596 (Minn.App.1995) (quoting Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976)).
green Marriage of Kahn v. Tronnier (1996)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Warner v. Warner, 391 N.W.2d 870, 873 (Minn.App.1986) (citing Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976)).
green State Bank of Cokato v. Ziehwein (1994)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Hickerson v. Bender (1993)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
ANALYSIS In an appeal from a judgment where no motion for a new trial was made, review is limited to “whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether [the] findings sustain the conclusions of law and the judgment.” Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976). 1.
green Comstock & Davis, Inc. v. G.D.S. & Associates (1992)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976). 1.
green Beasley v. Medin (1992)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Hennepin County v. Hanneman (1991)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
“Where there has been no motion for a new trial the only questions for review are whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such findings sustain the conclusions of law and the judgment.” Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green County of Isanti v. Peterson (1991)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Herzig v. Larson-Sawchak (1991)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976) (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green In Re Estate of LeBrun (1990)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green O'Kronglis v. Broberg (1990)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Matter of Gonzalez (1990)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Thompson v. City of Red Wing (1990)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green St. Cloud National Bank & Trust Co. v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society (1990)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Citizens State Bank of Hayfield v. Leth (1990)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976); Hardwick v. Hansen, 374 N.W.2d 297, 299 (Minn.Ct.App.1985).
green Marriage of Mahady v. Mahady (1989)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
As such, it questions “whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such findings sustain the conclusions of law and the judgment.” Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Town of Belle Prairie v. Kliber (1989)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Williams v. Boswell (1989)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Farrell v. Johnson (1989)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Kramer Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Scharmer, 386 N.W.2d 742, 745 (Minn.Ct.App.1986) (quoting Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976)).
green Marriage of Amatuzio v. Amatuzio (1988)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Marriage of Keith v. Keith (1988)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Wenndt v. Wenndt, 398 N.W.2d 7, 9 (Minn.Ct.App.1986) (quoting Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976)).
green Matter of Welfare of Sn (1988)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Centennial Insurance Co. v. Zylberberg (1988)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Hoffman v. Halter (1988)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).
green Franklin Auto Body Co. v. Wicker (1987)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 460 , 246 N.W.2d 565, 569 (1976).