Travelers Insurance Company v. Woodard (1970)

green · 16 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 7

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Durst v. Hill Country Memorial Hospital (2001)

Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Co. v. Woodard, 461 S.W.2d 493, 496 (Tex.Civ.App.-Tyler 1970, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (noting there is nothing in the rules requiring a party to grant his adversary the right to have access to the files of his doctors and other witnesses, together with the right to interrogate them outside of his presence and hearing).

green U.S. Fire Insurance Co. v. Ramos (1993)

Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Co. v. Woodard, where the issue of "injury" was omitted from the charge, the Court held that such a finding was properly deemed as it was not an independent ground of recovery but was a component of the ultimate issue of the claimant's right of recovery. 461 S.W.2d 493, 497 (Tex.Civ.App.Tyler 1970, writ ref'd n.r.e.).

green Rios v. Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation (2001)

Rule Authority · Tex. App.

The trial court did not permit the defense to reveal her refusal to the jury, and the appellate court agreed, stating “we do not believe there is anything in the rules requiring a party to grant his adversary the right to have access to the files of his doctors and other witnesses, together with the right to interrogate them outside of his presence and hearing.” 461 S.W.2d 493, 496 (Tex.Civ.App.-Tyler 1970, writ ref'd n.r.e.).

green Rios v. DEPT. OF MHMR (2001)

Rule Authority · Tex. App.

The trial court did not permit the defense to reveal her refusal to the jury, and the appellate court agreed, stating "we do not believe there is anything in the rules requiring a party to grant his adversary the right to have access to the files of his doctors and other witnesses, together with the right to interrogate them outside of his presence and hearing." 461 S.W.2d 493, 496 (Tex.Civ.App.Tyler 1970, writ ref'd n.r.e.).

green Perkins Ex Rel. Miles v. United States (1995)

Rule Authority · E.D. Tex.

Co. v. Woodard, 461 S.W.2d 493, 496 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1970, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (“[W]e do not believe there is anything in the rules requiring a party to grant his adversary the right of access to the files of his doctors and other witnesses, together with the right to interrogate them outside his presence and hearing.”).

green Mutter v. Wood (1988)

Cited · Tex. · signal: see

See Travelers Insurance Co. v. Woodard, 461 S.W.2d 493 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1970, writ ref’d n.r.e.).

green Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Urias (1972)

Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see

See Travelers Insurance Company v. Woodard, 461 S.W.2d 493 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1971, writ ref’d n. r. e.).