How cited: Johnson v. Hassett · Go Syfert

Johnson v. Hassett (1974)

green · 225 citation events across 35 courts. Showing the 23 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197420002026
Rule Authority · N.D. · 7 citations in this opinion
Noting that "[i]n constitutional law, as in other matters, times change and *209 doctrines change with the times," [ Johnson, supra, 217 N.W.2d at 779], the court held that "[c]hanges in circumstances may make irrational a classification which was formerly a rational State purpose." Johnson, supra, 217 N.W.2d at 772, Syll. ¶ 5.
Rule Authority · N.D. · 4 citations in this opinion
As we said in Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771, 779 (N.D.1974): "In constitutional law, as in other matters, times change and doctrines change with the times." We also stated in that opinion, at 777: "Even when a statute has been in effect for a long time, our duty to consider its constitutionality, when the matter comes before us, continues, and this duty has been performed even in the face of prior holdings of constitutionality." Recent Montana and Michigan Cases Courts …
green Huy Le v. Lautrup (2006)
Rule Authority · Neb. · 2 citations in this opinion
Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771, 778 (N.D.1974).
green Hoffner v. Johnson (2003)
Rule Authority · N.D. · 2 citations in this opinion
Our Court recognized this development in Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771, 776 (N.D.1974), and concluded that such standard was similar to our intermediate standard of review.
Rule Authority · N.D. · 2 citations in this opinion
In Kitto v. Minot Park District, 224 N.W.2d 795, 804 (N.D.1974), and in Johnson v. Hasset, 217 N.W.2d 771, 780 (N.D.1974), we applied the ruling to each case and prospectively.
green Walker v. Omdahl (1976)
Rule Authority · N.D. · 2 citations in this opinion
In Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771 at 780 (N.D.1974), we held the guest statute unconstitutional and applied the decision to the case and to all claims for relief accruing on and after the date of the original decision.
green Stoehr v. Whipple (1976)
Rule Authority · D. Neb. · 2 citations in this opinion
E. g., Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771, 777-79 (N.D.1974); Prosser, Law of Torts, § 34 (1971); Casenote, 53 Neb.L.Rev. 267 (1974).
Rule Authority · N.D. · 2 citations in this opinion
Without concurring in all that is said in Kirchner and without adopting the view of the dissent in Swoap , we conclude that Section 25-09-04, N.D.C.C., as it relates to the responsibility of children to pay for their parents' care at the State Hospital, which care results from an involuntary commitment, is a denial of the equal protection of the laws and unconstitutional as a violation of Sections 11 and 20 of the North Dakota State Constitution. *76 In accord with our decis…
green State v. Sapa (2022)
Rule Authority · N.D.
Newman Signs, Inc. v. Hjelle, 268 N.W.2d 741, 758 (N.D. 1978); Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771, 776-77 (N.D. 1974).
green Bouchard v. Johnson (1996)
Rule Authority · N.D.
Id. (citing Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771, 775 (N.D.1974)).
green State v. Zahn (1996)
Rule Authority · N.D.
Id. (citing Johnson v. Hasset , 217 N.W.2d 771, 775 (N.D. 1974)).
Rule Authority · N.D.
I, § 21]; Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771, 774 (N.D.1974) [Art.
Rule Authority · D.N.D.
In determining the effect of § 9-10-07 in Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771, 779, 780 (N.D.1974) the supreme court referred approvingly to, but did not rely on or defer to, Nebraska and Wyoming case law.
Rule Authority · Md.
No one should be surprised if a statute passes the one set of standards and not the other. [Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771, 775-76 (N.D. 1974); see Nehring v. Russell, 582 P.2d 67, 76 (Wyo. 1978) (finding of constitutionality under the federal equal protection clause not restrictive of what State court may find under its own constitution even though both provisions may have the same overall end).] See generally, Brennan, State Constitutions and the Protection of Individu…
Rule Authority · N.D.
“At the other level, which involves non-suspect classifications, the Supreme Court has used the ‘traditional’ equal-protection analysis, * * *” Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771 at 775 (N.D.1974).
Cited · N.D. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771, 779 (N.D.1974) (construing constitutionality of guest statute and stating in matters of constitutional law, as in other matters, times change and doctrine changes with the times); Ferch v. Housing Auth., 79 N.D. 764, 772 , 59 N.W.2d 849, 856 (N.D.1953) (stating views as to what constitutes a public use vary with changing conceptions of scope and functions of government); State v. Norton, 64 N.D. 675, 686 , 255 N.W. 787, 792 (1934) (sta…
Cited · N.D. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771 at 780 (N.D. 1974).
Cited · N.D. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771 (N.D.1974).
Cited (see also) · Cal. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
(See, e.g., Thompson v. Hagan (1974) 96 Idaho 19 [ 523 P.2d 1365, 1368-1369 ]; Henry v. Bauder (1974) 213 Kan. 751 [ 518 P.2d 362, 369-371 ]; McGeehan v. Bunch (1975) 88 N.M. 308 [ 540 P.2d 238, 242-244 ]; see also, Johnson v. Hassett (N.D. 1974) 217 N.W.2d 771, 779-780 .) The application of this principle is not confined to guest statutes.
green Brewer v. Copeland (1975)
Cited · Wash. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Johnson v. Hassett, supra at 778; Thompson v. Hagan, supra .
Cited · N.D. · signal: see
See Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771, 780 (N.D.1974) [decision holding guest statute unconstitutional applied prospectively, except as to parties to action].
Cited (see also) · N.D. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771, 774 (N.D.1974); Horst v. Guy, 211 N.W.2d 723, 731 (N.D.1973); State v. E.W.
green Aguilar v. Flores (1976)
Cited (see also) · N.D. Iowa · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., Johnson v. Hassett, 217 N.W.2d 771 (N.D.1974); Henry v. Bauder, 213 Kan. 751 , 518 P.2d 362 (1974); Brown v. Merlo, 8 Cal.3d 855 , 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 (1973); MeConville v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co., 15 Wis.2d 374 , 113 N.W.2d 14 (1962).