Ocean County Landfill Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2011)
green
· 23 citation events
across 8 courts.
Showing the 14 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201220192026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
The Chemours Company FC, LLC v. EPA (2024)
Landfill Corp. v. EPA, 631 F.3d 652, 655 (3d Cir. 2011).
Region II, 631 F.3d 652, 655 (3d Cir.2011), the District Court stated: Defendants’ denial of the 1-130 application does not represent final agency action because it does not mark the consummation of the agency’s decision-making process.
green
Belle Co. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (2014)
Landfill Corp. v. EPA, 631 F.3d 652, 656 (3d Cir.2011) (“[W]here a state actor relies upon a federal agency’s notice, the state action does not convert the notice into a final agency act under the APA”) (citing Hindes v. FDIC, 137 F.3d 148, 163 (3d Cir.1998) (citing Air California v. U.S. Dep’t of Transp., 654 F.2d 616 , 621 (9th Cir.1981))); Resident Council of Allen Parkway Village v. U.S. Dep’t of Housing & Urban Dev., 980 F.2d 1043, 1055-56 (5th Cir.1993) (concluding tha…
green
Louisiana Dept of Env Quality v. EPA (2013)
Landfill Corp. v. EPA, 631 F.3d 652, 656 (3d Cir. 2011) (“We therefore regard § 7661d(c) as indicating Congress’s intent to subject those objections to judicial review only after the EPA’s issuance or denial of a permit.” (emphasis added)). 26 Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co., 537 U.S. 149, 159 (2003). 6 No. 12-60482 challenging an EPA objection.
“We therefore regard § 7661d(c) as indicating Congress’s intent to subject those objections to judicial review only after the EPA’s issuance or denial of a permit.” (emphasis added)
green
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2013)
Landfill Corp. v. EPA, 631 F.3d 652, 656 (3d Cir.2011) (“We therefore regard § 7661d(c) as indicating Congress's intent to subject those objections to judicial review only after the EPA’s issuance or denial of a permit.” (emphasis added)). 26 .
green
United States v. Maury (2012)
Landfill Corp. v. United States EPA, 631 F.3d 652, 654 (3d Cir.2011) (citing 42 U.S.C. §§ 7661-7661 f, 7661 a(d)(l), 40 C.F.R. § 70 , App. A).
green
NAGLE v. JADDOU (2024)
Landfill Corp. v. United States E.P.A., Region II, 631 F.3d 652, 655 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154 , 177–78 (1997)). 16 Id. (quoting Univ. of Med. & Dentistry of N.J. v. Corrigan, 347 F.3d 57 , 69 (3d Cir. 2003)). 17 Patel v. Garland, 596 U.S. 328 , 333 (2022). 18 8 U.S.C. § 1153 (b). 19 Id. § 1153(b)(1)(A). 20 8 C.F.R. § 204.5 (h)(1).
quoting Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154 , 177–78 (1997)
Region II, 631 F.3d 652, 655 (3d Cir. 2011)).
green
Ashh, Inc. v. United States of America (2022)
As the District of Delaware also found, the court agrees that “[u]nder no reasonable interpretation of ‘finality’ can the seizure of goods, which sets off a codified procedure for forfeiture or petitions, be considered the ‘consummation’ of an ‘agency’s decisionmaking process.’ Seizures do not determine the rights or obligations of LKQ, nor do legal consequences flow from the decision to seize the goods under the customs laws.” LKQ Corp., 369 F. Supp. 3d at 588 (citing Ocean…
green
MATULEWSKI v. POMPEO (2019)
Landfill Corp. v. U.S. E.P.A., Region II, 631 F.3d 652, 655 (3d Cir. 2011).
green
City of Phila. v. Sessions (2018)
Landfill Corp. v. U.S. E.P.A., Region II , 631 F.3d 652 655 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Bennett v. Spear , 520 U.S. 154 , 177-178, 117 S.Ct. 1154 , 137 L.Ed.2d 281 (1997) ).
green
IN RE NEWARK ENERGY CENTER PROPOSED AIR POLLUTION CONTROLOPERATING PERMIT MODIFICATION(NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT … (2017)
Landfill Corp. v. USEPA, 631 F.3d 652, 654 (3d Cir. 2011).
green
City of Philadelphia v. Sessions (2017)
Landfill Corp. v. U.S. E.P.A., Region II, 631 F.3d 652, 655 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154, 177-78 , 117 S.Ct. 1154 , 137 L.Ed.2d 281 (1997)).
green
Naik v. Renaud (2013)
Region II, 631 F.3d 652, 655 (3d Cir.2011) (quoting Univ. of Med. & Dentistry of New Jersey v. Corrigan, 347 F.3d 57 , 69 (3d Cir.2003)).