Concerned Tenants of Father Panik Village v. Pierce (1988)
green
· 56 citation events
across 23 courts.
Showing the 21 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Aponte-Rosario v. Acevedo-Vilá (2010)
See, e.g., Tinsley v. Kemp, 750 F.Supp. 1001 (W.D.Mo.1990); Concerned Tenants Ass'n of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 321 (D.Conn.1988).
green
Velez v. Cisneros (1994)
Auth., 780 F.Supp. 511, 513-14 (N.D.111.1991); Tinsley v. Kemp, 750 F.Supp. 1001, 1008-09 (W.D.Mo.1990); Concerned Tenants Ass’n of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 320 (D.Conn.1988).
green
Dewakuku v. Cuomo (2000)
Auth., 479 U.S. 418, 432 , 107 S.Ct. 766 , 93 L.Ed.2d 781 (1987); Howard v. Pierce, 738 F.2d 722, 729 (6th Cir.1984); Tinsley v. Kemp, 750 F.Supp. 1001, 1008 (W.D.Mo.1990); Concerned Tenants Ass’n of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 320 (D.Conn.1988).
Accord Tinsley v. Kemp, 750 F.Supp. 1001, 1008 (W.D.Mo.1990)); Concerned Tenants Ass’n of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 320 (D.Conn.1988); contra Dessin v. Housing Authority of Fort Meyers, 783 F.Supp. 587 (M.D.Fla.1990).
green
Henry Horner Mothers Guild v. Chicago Hous. Auth. (1991)
The Court agrees that "in light of this amendment and its legislative history, there can be no doubt that Congress intended that § 1437p create enforceable rights." Concerned Tenants Ass'n of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 320 (D.Conn.1988).
The Court agrees that “in light of this amendment and its legislative history, there can be no doubt that Congress intended that § 1437p create enforceable rights.” Concerned Tenants Ass’n of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 320 (D.Conn.1988).
green
Tinsley v. Kemp (1990)
In Concerned Tenants Ass’n of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 321 (D.Conn.1988), the court said: * * * By enacting § 1437p, Congress intended to prohibit the destruction of public housing projects without HUD approval.
green
Davis v. City of New York (2012)
See Edwards v. District of Columbia, 821 F.2d 651 , 653 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1987); Concerned Tenants Assoc. v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 322 (D.Conn.1988) ("Tenants would have an enforceable right under § 1437d(Z)(2) and the regulations promulgated thereto to a lease that contains the requirements provided in the statute and the regulations.”); and Herring v. Chicago Housing Auth., No. 90 Civ. 3797, 1993 WL 489767 , at *17 (N.D.Ill.
green
Delgado v. New York City Housing Authority (2009)
Compliance with a housing code is not an unambiguously confirmed right secured by the force of federal law (see generally Gonzaga Univ. v Doe, 536 US 273, 283, 290 [2002]) or the United States Constitution (see Lindsey v Normet, 405 US 56, 74 [1972]), and United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 USC) § 1437d (1) (3), which obligates public housing authorities to maintain projects “in a decent, safe, and sanitary condition,” “does not create a right enforceable under § 1983 to p…
green
Charlie H. v. Whitman (2000)
Plaintiffs also cite McNeill v. New York City Housing Authority, 719 F.Supp. 233, 248 (S.D.N.Y.1989), and Concerned Tenants of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 323 (D.Conn.1988).
green
Aristil v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF TAMPA (1999)
See Price v. Pierce, 823 F.2d 1114, 1121-23 (7th Cir.1987); Holbrook v. Pitt, 643 F.2d 1261, 1269-73 (7th Cir.1981); Concerned Tenants Ass’n of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 318-19 (D.Conn. 1988); Gonzalez v. St.
green
Ryan v. Fire Protection Sprinkler Systems Board (1998)
Concerned Tenants Ass’n of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 323 (D.Conn.1988) (Daly, J.).
green
Cobos v. Dona Ana County Housing Authority (1995)
Auth., 806 F.Supp. 515, 525-26 (E.D.Pa.1992); Henry Homer Mothers Guild, 780 F.Supp. at 515 ; Concerned Tenants Ass’n of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 322 (D.Conn.1988); see also Suter v. Artist M., 503 U.S. 347, 356-69 , 112 S.Ct. 1360, 1367-70 , 118 L.Ed.2d 1 (1992) (statutory requirement of “reasonable efforts” by state to maintain abused children in home mandated inclusion of that term in state plan, but did not unambiguously create an enforceable righ…
green
National Leased Housing Ass'n v. United States (1994)
See e.g., Henry Horner Mothers Guild v. Chicago Housing Authority, 824 F.Supp. 808, 820 (N.D.Ill.1993); Gomez v. Housing Authority, 805 F.Supp. 1363, 1368 (W.D.Tex.1992); Hurt v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 806 F.Supp. 515, 527 (E.D.Pa. 1992); Henry Horner Mothers Guild v. Chicago Housing Authority, 780 F.Supp. 511, 515 (N.D.Ill.1991); Tinsley v. Kemp, 750 F.Supp. 1001, 1012 (W.D.Mo.1990); Concerned Tenants of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 323 (D.Conn.…
green
Gomez v. Housing Authority of City of El Paso (1992)
See Henry Horner, 780 F.Supp. at 515 ; Tinsley, 750 F.Supp. at 1009 ; Concerned Tenants Ass’n of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 321 (D.Conn.1988); but see Dessin, 783 F.Supp. at 590 (decided before Henry Homer).
green
Dessin v. Housing Authority of City of Fort Myers (1990)
See Tinsley v. Kemp, 750 F.Supp. 1001 (W.D.Mo.1990); Concerned Tenants Ass’n of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 319-321 (D.Conn.1988).
green
Ayala v. Boston Housing Authority (1989)
Id. at 322, 324 .
green
Anderson v. Jackson (2009)
See Concerned Tenants Ass’n of Father Panik Vill. v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 321 (D.Conn. 1988); Tinsley v. Kemp, 750 F.Supp. 1001, 1008-09 (W.D.Mo.1990); Henry Horner Mothers Guild v. Chicago Housing Auth., 780 F.Supp. 511, 513-15 (N.D.Ill.1991); Gomez v. Housing Auth. of the City of El Paso, 805 F.Supp. 1363, 1374-75 (W.D.Texas 1992); Velez v. Cisneros, 850 F.Supp. 1257, 1269-71 (E.D.Pa.1994).
green
Kabbani v. Council House, Inc. (2005)
See Concerned Tenants Ass’n v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316 (D.Conn.1988) (noting that a private cause of action existed against the local housing authority to enforce Section 1437d).
green
Brian A. Ex Rel. Brooks v. Sundquist (2000)
See, e.g., Concerned Tenants Ass’n of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 324 (D.Conn.1988) (tenants have enforceable rights as intended beneficiaries to obtain compliance with obhgations under contract between HUD and local agency); Holbrook v. Pitt, 643 F.2d 1261, 1273 (7th Cir.1981) (tenants were third party beneficiaries of HUD contracts with owners); Dewakuku v. Cuomo, 107 F.Supp.2d 1117, 1134-35 (D.Ariz.2000) (purchaser of substandard housing was intended …
green
McNeill v. New York City Housing Authority (1989)
See also Concerned Tenants of Father Panik Village v. Pierce, 685 F.Supp. 316, 323 (D.Conn.1988) (following Holbrook); Ashton v. Pierce, 716 F.2d 56, 66 (D.C.Cir.1983), amended, 723 F.2d 70 (D.C.Cir.1983).