Porter v. Pathfinder Services, Inc. (1996)

green · 25 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 8

Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199820122026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Joyce v. Cadia Healthcare-Silverside (2026)

Rule Authority · Del. Super. Ct.

References here are to the page numbers noted when viewing the document in digital format via File&Servexpress which includes the cover page and caption as page 1.) 48 Porter v. Pathfinder Services, Inc., 683 A.2d 40, 42 (Del. 1996). 49 Id. (citations omitted). 50 Id. 51 MSJ, Ex.

green Centrella v. Avantor, Inc. (2024)

Rule Authority · Del. Ch.

For example, one court has applied the Newton test when interpreting the meaning of the word “employment” in a contract.92 The court reasoned that “[t]here 87 Fisher, 695 A.2d at 58 (citations omitted). 88 Porter v. Pathfinder Servs., Inc., 683 A.2d 40, 42 (Del. 1996) (citations omitted). 89 Id. 90 Newton, 204 A.2d at 395 . 91 Harleysville Mut.

citations omitted

green Layne v. Gavilon Grain LLC (2015)

Rule Authority · Del. Super. Ct.

Newtown Trucking Co. v. Neal, 204 A.2d 393 (Del. 1964). 55 Id. at 395 . 56 Porter v. Pathfinder Serv., Inc., 683 A.2d 40, 42 (Del. 1996). 11 As to element two, both Access and Gavilon could discharge Mr. Layne.

green GKN Co. v. Magness (2001)

Rule Authority · Ind.

See, e.g., Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 164 Ariz. 505 , 794 P.2d 138, 142 (1990) ("Where thle] right of control exists, the inference of the employer-employee relationship is strengthened."); Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment Comm'n, 28 Cal.2d 33 , 168 P.2d 686, 692 (1946) ("[The most important factor [in determining whether an employer-employee relationship exists] is the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired."), ove…

green New Castle County, Delaware v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa (1999)

Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see also

Co., 970 F.2d 1267, 1271 (3d Cir.1992) {“New Castle v. Hartford III”) (construing a term “in context with the function of the [insurance] policy”); see also Porter v. Pathfinder Servs., Inc., 683 A.2d 40, 42 (Del.1996) (construing language of an employment contract in its context as a whole).

green New Castle County v. Natl Union Fire Ins (1999)

Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see also

Co., 970 F.2d 1267 , 1271 (3d Cir. 1991) ("New Castle v. Hartford III") (construing a term "in context with the function of the [insurance] policy"); see also Porter v. Pathfinder Servs., Inc., 683 A.2d 40, 42 (Del. 1996) (construing language of an employment contract in its context as a whole).

construing language of an employment contract in its context as a whole

green Higgins v. Walls (2005)

Cited · Del. Super. Ct. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Porter v. Pathfinder Servs., Inc., 683 A.2d 40, 42 (Del.1996)("The existence of an employer-employee relationship is an issue of law.”); Barnard v. State, 642 A.2d 808, 813 (Del.Super.Ct. 1992)("The question of the existence of an employer/employee relationship is an issue of law that depends on the facts and circumstances of the particular case, with no single element being decisive.”). 55 .

green Diamond Chapter 7 v. Friedman (In Re Century City Doctors Hospital, LLC) (2012)

Cited · Bankr. C.D. Cal. · signal: see

See Porter v. Pathfinder Servs., Inc., 683 A.2d 40, 42 (Del.1996) (a “contract must be construed in its context as a whole”); E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc. v. Shell Oil Co., 498 A.2d 1108, 1113 (Del.1985) (“a court must construe the agreement as a whole, giving effect to all provisions therein”).