Minter v. City of Grand Rapids (2007)

green · 23 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 4

Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

200720162026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Belknap v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. (2008)

Rule Authority · 6th Cir.

The Michigan Court of Appeals has explained that, under the statute, “[i] f a properly qualified doctor testifies ‘that *419 there may be a serious neurological injury,’ there would automatically be a jury question.” Minter v. Grand Rapids, 275 Mich.App. 220 , 739 N.W.2d 108, 112 (2007) (emphasis in original).

emphasis in original

green Nahsuante S Scarber v. Delvester D Issa (2022)

Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Id. at 223-224, 228-230 (DAVIS, J.), 231-233 (O’CONNELL, P.J., concurring).

DAVIS, J.

green Fisher v. Blankenship (2009)

Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

The seriousness of a disfigurement “depends on its physical characteristics rather than its effect on [a] plaintiffs ability to live a normal life.” Nelson v Myers, 146 Mich App 444, 446 ; 381 NW2d 407 (1985); Minter, supra at 228, 242-243.

green White v. Taylor Distributing Co. (2007)

Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App.

In effect, summary disposition is intended to facilitate two important Michigan public policies: resolution of disputes on their merits, and avoidance of unnecessary expenditures where there is no actual dispute or where the only material dispute is over a point of law. [Minter v Grand Rapids, 275 Mich App 220, 230;_NW2d_(2007).] In regard to automobile accidents, MCL 257.402(a) provides a rebuttable presumption of negligence under specified circumstances.