State v. Benthall (2005)
green
· 5 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 2 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. AL-SHAREEF METZ (12-06-1491 AND 12-06-1492, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (2017)
Super. 242, 252 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 158 N.J. 687 (1999); State v. Benthall, 182 N.J. 373, 380 (2005) (emphasizing a prior inconsistent statement is only admissible under N.J.R.E. 607 after the trial court finds "the party seeking to neutralize had no prior knowledge that the witness would testify contrary to the prior statement").
emphasizing a prior inconsistent statement is only admissible under N.J.R.E. 607 after the trial court finds "the party seeking to neutralize had no prior knowledge that the witness would testify contrary to the prior statement"
green
State v. Burns (2007)
See State v. Benthall, 182 N.J. 373, 379 , 865 A.2d 693 (2005); State v. Brown, 138 N.J. 481, 544 , 651 A.2d 19 (1994) (concluding that “constitutional confrontation guarantees are not violated by a witness’s lack of recollection regarding an introduced prior statement or the events described in such a statement”), overruled on other grounds by State v. Cooper, 151 N.J. 326, 361 , 700 A.2d 306 (1997).