Ruotolo v. State of New York (1994)
green
· 25 citation events
across 8 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199420102026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
West Contra Costa Unified School Dist. v. Super. Ct. (2024)
(Compare Veterans’ Welfare Bd. v. Riley (1922) 189 Cal. 159, 170 [“Our own decisions consistently hold that an appropriation of public funds based upon a moral obligation as a consideration is a gift within the meaning of the Constitution.”] with, e.g., Ruotolo v. State (1994) 83 N.Y.2d 248, 259 [“If the waiver of immunity from liability imposed by the Legislature rests on an adequate moral obligation, then the bypass does not offend the no-gift prohibition.”]; Koike v. Bd. …
green
Sorum v. State (2020)
See Schoon v. NDDOT, 2018 ND 210, ¶ 23 , 917 N.W.2d 199 ; Ruotolo v. State, 631 N.E.2d 90, 96-97 (N.Y. 1994) (rejecting argument that the legislature may violate the state’s due process rights by enacting a law reviving unenforceable claims).
rejecting argument that the legislature may violate the state’s due process rights by enacting a law reviving unenforceable claims
green
Sorum v. State (2020)
See Schoon v. NDDOT, 2018 ND 210, ¶ 23 , 917 N.W.2d 199 ; Ruotolo v. State, 631 N.E.2d 90, 96-97 (N.Y. 1994) (rejecting argument that the legislature may violate the state’s due process rights by enacting a law reviving unenforceable claims).
rejecting argument that the legislature may violate the state’s due process rights by enacting a law reviving unenforceable claims
green
Opn. No. (2003)
See , e.g. , Ruotolo v. New York , 83 N.Y.2d 248 , 259 (1994) (retroactive compensation of individual does not violate prohibition against gifts if it rests on adequate moral obligation).
retroactive compensation of individual does not violate prohibition against gifts if it rests on adequate moral obligation
green
Opn. No. (2002)
See 48 N.Y.2d at 350 , 353-54 and n. 1. 2 The Court of Appeals has also noted that a government's retroactive compensation of an individual "does not offend the [constitutional] no-gift prohibition if it rests on an adequate moral obligation." Ruotolo v. State , 83 N.Y.2d 248 , 259 (1954).
green
Gonzalez v. Iocovello (1999)
As this Court recently stated in a related context but different circumstance, “an expansive interpretation is consistent with the over-all goal of this legislation, as demonstrated by the Legislature through its numerous amendments to the statute” (Schiavone v City of New York, 92 NY2d 308, 317; see *549 also, Ruotolo v State of New York [Ruotolo II], 83 NY2d 248 ).
green
Schiavone v. City of New York (1998)
The statute also explicitly exempted these actions from any notice of claim requirements, including General Municipal Law §§ 50-e and 50-i. The Legislature noted that the bill was necessary to deal with “conflicting court interpretations of whether injuries and deaths that occurred prior to the effective date of [the original enactment] can be redressed as a result of its passage” (id., at 2494-2495; see generally, Matter of Ruotolo v State of New York [Ruotolo II], 83 NY2d …
green
Zanghi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. (1996)
Further, the numerous legislative amendments to section 205-e clearly manifest the Legislature’s intent that section 205-e be liberally construed and apply to the broadest possible class of claimants protected by that section (see, L 1990, ch 762; L 1992, ch 474; L 1996, ch 703; see also, Ruotolo v State of New York, 83 NY2d 248, 257-258 ; Santangelo v State of New York, 193 AD2d 25 ).