Manning v. Amerman (1998)

green · 92 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 9

Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199920122026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Papas v. Gaming Control Board (2003)

Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Manning v. Amerman, 229 Mich.App. 608, 610, 615 , 582 N.W.2d 539 (1998).

green Estate of Shirley Bittner v. Suzanne Bittner-Korbus (2017)

Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App.

In any event, “[i]n determining jurisdiction, this Cout will look beyond a [party’s] choice in labels concerning the p[arty’s] claim.” Manning v Amerman, 229 Mich App 608 ; 582 NW2d 539, 541 (1998).

green Estate of Shirley Bittner v. Suzanne Bittner-Korbus (2017)

Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App.

green Mark L Rugiero v. George R Lubienski (2016)

Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App.

Joy v Two-Bit Corp, 287 Mich 244, 253 ; 283 NW 45 (1938); Neal v Oakwood Hospital Corp, 226 Mich App 701, 707 ; 575 NW2d 68 (1997); Manning v Amerman, 229 Mich App 608, 613 ; 582 NW2d 539, 541 (1998).

green Mark L Rugiero v. George R Lubienski (2016)

Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App.

“In determining jurisdiction, this Court will look beyond a plaintiff's choice of labels to the true nature of the plaintiff's claim.” Manning v Amerman, 229 Mich App 608, 613 ; 582 NW2d 539, 541 (1998).

green Robin Lepard v. Nbd Bank, a Division of Bank One Walter O. Koch Jeremy H. Lepard and Patricia C. Lepard (2004)

Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion

“The [probate] exception applies both to purely probate matters, and to matters ancillary to probate in the practical sense that allowing it [the case] to be *238 maintained in federal court would impair the policies served by the probate exception to diversity jurisdiction.” Cenker, 660 F.Supp. at 795 (quotation marks omitted); see also Manning v. Amerman, 229 Mich.App. 608, 582 N.W.2d 539, 540 (1998) (affirming the trial court’s ruling that the trust beneficiaries’ claims …

green Lepard v. NBD Bank (2004)

Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see also

“The [probate] exception applies both to purely probate matters, and to matters ancillary to probate in the practical sense that allowing it [the case] to be maintained in federal court would impair the policies served by the probate exception to diversity jurisdiction.” Cenker, 660 F. Supp. at 795 (quotation marks omitted); see also Manning v. Amerman, 582 N.W.2d 539, 540 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998) (affirming the trial court’s ruling that the trust beneficiaries’ claims for “tor…

green Kawecki Ex Rel. Marlowe v. County of MacOmb (2005)

Cited · E.D. Mich. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Manning v. Amerman, 229 Mich.App. 608 , 582 N.W.2d 539, 541-42 (1998); see also Shields v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.

green William Scott Kincaid v. the City of Flint (2020)

Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Manning v Amerman, 229 Mich App 608, 613 ; 582 NW2d 539 (1998) (stating that courts are not bound by the labels that parties attach to their claims); see also Adams v Adams (On Reconsideration), 276 Mich App 704, 710-711 ; 742 NW2d 399 (2007) (“It is well settled that the gravamen of an action is determined by reading the complaint as a whole, and by looking beyond mere procedural labels to determine the exact nature of the claim.”). -9- between July 3, 2006 and June 30,…