Holland v. King (1986)
green
· 61 citation events
across 11 courts.
Showing the 15 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198720062026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, F.S.B. v. Pearce (2026)
Ct. May 27, 2003), aff'd, 839 A.2d 665 (Del. 2003) (citing Holland v. King, 500 N.E.2d 1229, 1235 (Ind. Ct. App. 1986)); see also Mullane v. Cent.
green
Tax Certificate Investments, Inc. v. Smethers (1999)
In Holland v. King, 500 N.E.2d 1229, 1237 (Ind.Ct.App.1986), the court stated: “Our legislature intended to place the burden of notifying the county taxing authority of the taxpayer’s correct address upon the taxpayer.
green
Dahn v. Trownsell (1998)
Id. (emphasis added). [¶ 23.] Whether the notice procedures contained in SDCL 10-25-5 are reasonable also depend upon the outcome of the balance between the “interest of the state” and the “individual interest sought to be protected.” Holland v. King, 500 N.E.2d 1229, 1235 (Ind.Ct.App.1986) (quoting Mullane, 339 U.S. at 314 , 70 S.Ct. at 657 , 94 L.Ed. at 873 and holding that due process rights were protected by mailing notice of intent to take tax deed to owner’s last known…
green
Marion Assets 2020 LLC v. FIASCONE FAMILY LP (2023)
If . . . notice reaches this address, then notice is sufficient[.]”) (quoting Holland v. King, 500 N.E.2d 1229, 1237 (Ind. Ct. App. 1986)).
green
Shenvar v. Johnson (2001)
In Holland v. King, 500 N.E.2d 1229, 1237 (Ind.Ct.App.1986), the court stated: “Our legislature intended to place the burden of notifying the county taxing authority of the taxpayer’s correct address upon the taxpayer.
green
Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Anderson (1996)
Holland v. King, 500 N.E.2d 1229, 1233 (Ct.App.1986), reh’g denied.
green
Benton v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. (1993)
See Sapiente v. Waltuch, 127 Conn. 224 , 15 A.2d 417, 418 (1940); Farrell v. Brown, 111 Idaho 1027 , 729 P.2d 1090, 1095 (App.1986); Holland v. King, 500 N.E.2d 1229, 1238 (Ind.App.1986); Cole v. The C. & N.W.
green
Golden Sands Club Condominium, Inc. v. Waller (1988)
Holland v. King, 500 N.E.2d 1229, 1235 (Ind.App.1986).
green
Cobbum v. Ameritrust National Bank, Michiana (1991)
See Holland v. King (1986), Ind.App., 500 N.E.2d 1229, 1238 , reh'g denied (statutory notice of tax sale proceedings); Board of Aviation Commissioners of St.
green
Forum Group, Inc. v. McMichael (1991)
See Holland v. King (1986), Ind.App., 500 N.E.2d 1229 (holding notice to a property owner of a pending tax sale by certified mail at his last known address is a means of notice reasonably calculated to apprise the owner of the sale); Clark v. Jones (1988), Ind.App., 519 N.E.2d 158 (holding the notice statutes and constitutional due process requirements do not impose upon the auditor a duty to search for an alternative address).
green
Ransburg v. Kirk (1987)
See, Holland, supra, 500 N.E.2d at 1234-35 ; footnote 3; Walker v. City of Hutchinson (1956), 352 U.S. 112, 115 , 77 S.Ct. 200, 202 , 1 L.Ed.2d 178 ; New York City v. New York N.H. & H.R.
green
Anton v. Davis (1995)
See Holland v. King (1986), Ind.App., 500 N.E.2d 1229 , 1233 n. 2 (noting decisions which recognize that a duty is imposed upon property owners to watch tax proceedings in order to protect their interests).
green
Yadon v. Quinoco Petroleum, Inc. (1992)
Goff, Inc., 92 N.M. 106, 108 , 583 P.2d 470, 472 (1978) (summary judgment should not be used as a substitute for trial); see also Holland v. King, 500 N.E.2d 1229, 1238 (Ind.Ct.App.1986) (even if court believes nonmoving party may not prevail at trial, summary judgment should not be entered where there is a conflict in material facts or different inferences may be drawn).
See Holland v. King, 500 N.E.2d 1229, 1235 (Ind.App.1986). 7 .
green
Sherelis v. Duckworth (1987)
See also Holland v. King, 500 N.E.2d 1229 (Ind.App.1986).