Silliman v. Cassell (In Re Cassell) (2010)

green · 19 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 8

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Thomas J. McFarland v. A. Stephenson Wallace (2015)

Rule Authority · 11th Cir.

See, e.g., Lampe v. Williamson (In re Lampe), 331 F.3d 750, 754 (10th Cir.2003); Caron v. Farmington Nat'l Bank (In re Caron), 82 F.3d 7, 10 (1st Cir.1996); Silliman v. Cassell (In re Cassell), 443 B.R. 200, 203 (Bankr.N.D.Ga. 2010). 1 And under Rule 4003(c) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the burden is on the party objecting to exemptions to prove, by a preponderance of evidence, “that the exemptions are not properly claimed.” Thus, we will construe the exempt…

green Bruce Raymond Wainer, Sr. and Stella Thalmer Wainer (2021)

Rule Authority · Bankr. E.D. Pa. · 7 citations in this opinion

In re Cassell, 443 B.R. at 204 (collecting cases).

collecting cases

green Badgley Mullins Turner, Pllc App./x-resp. v. Leslie Spencer & Tammy S., Blakey, Resp./x-app. (2018)

Rule Authority · Wash. Ct. App.

In re Cassell, 443 B.R. 200, 210 (Bankr.

green In re Rudd (2012)

Rule Authority · Bankr. M.D. Ala.

No. 595, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. 126). “[T]he burden is on the party objecting to the exemption, here the Trustee, to establish the objection by a preponderance of the evidence.” In re Cassell, 443 B.R. 200, 203-204 (Bankr.N.D.Ga. 2010) (stating the purpose of the exemptions “is to provide the debtor with a fresh start and they are therefore to be construed liberally.”).

stating the purpose of the exemptions “is to provide the debtor with a fresh start and they are therefore to be construed liberally.”

green Robert B. Silliman v. Lou Ann Cassell (2012)

Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., In re Cassell, 443 B.R. 200, 204 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.2010); In re Bramlette, 333 B.R. 911, 920-21 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.2005); In re Michael, 339 B.R. 798, 802-07 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.2005).

unpublished

green Robert B. Silliman v. Lou Ann Cassell (2012)

Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., In re Cassell, 443 B.R. 200, 204 (Bankr.

green Timothy Russell Hoffman (2019)

Cited · Bankr. N.D. Ga. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Rule 4003(c); see In re Cassell, 443 B.R. 200, 203-04 (Bankr.

green Wallace v. McFarland (In re) McFarland (2013)

Cited · Bankr. S.D. Ga. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See In re Cassell, 443 B.R. 200, 205-06 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.2010) (aff'd 713 F.3d 81 (11th Cir.2013)) (noting that cases in which the annuity at issue was a variable annuity or in which the annuity carried a guaranteed rate of return were more “investment like”).