How cited: Aubrey v. Office of the Attorney General · Go Syfert

Aubrey v. Office of the Attorney General (1999)

green · 66 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 45 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 45
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200220142026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Kentucky Public Pensions Authority on Behalf of the Joint Disability Appeals Committee of Kentucky Retirement… (2026)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
In McManus v. Kentucky Retirement Systems, we explained: “In its role as a finder of fact, an administrative agency is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the credibility of witnesses, including its findings and conclusions of fact.” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, Ky. App., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (1998) (citing Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller, Ky., 481 S.W.2d 298, 309 (1972)). . . .
citing Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller, Ky., 481 S.W.2d 298, 309 (1972)
green Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2003)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Aubrey v. Office of the Attorney General, Ky.App., 994 S.W.2d 516, 518 (1998).
green John Huffman v. City of Crescent Springs, Kentucky (2026)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
“In its role as a finder of fact, an administrative agency is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the credibility of witnesses, including its findings and conclusions of fact.” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998) (citing Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller, 481 S.W.2d 298, 309 (Ky. 1972)).
citing Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller, 481 S.W.2d 298, 309 (Ky. 1972)
green Signore, LLC D/B/A Derby Lane Mobile Home Community v. Louisville Metro Department of Public Health and Welln… (2026)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Id. at 518-19 (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green Matthew Stewart v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2026)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Thus, the policy facially has “the full force and effect of law.” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 520 (Ky. App. 1998). -5- error entitles a party to appellate relief.
green Rent-A-Center East, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, Finance and Administration Cabinet, Commonwealth of Kentuc… (2025)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Off. of the Att’y Gen., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998).
green Kentucky Public Pensions Authority v. Brian Swint (2025)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
“In its role as a finder of fact, an administrative agency is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the credibility of witnesses, including its findings and conclusions of fact.” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, Ky.App., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (1998) (citing Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller, Ky., 481 S.W.2d 298, 309 (1972)). 124 S.W.3d at 458 .
green Douglas L. Gordon v. Ronald Waldridge (2025)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Office of Att’y Gen., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998).
green Kentucky State University v. Karah Stokes (2024)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
We further note that “[i]n its role as a finder of fact, an administrative agency is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the credibility of witnesses[.]” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney Gen., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998); see also McManus v. Kentucky Ret.
green Dr. Karah Stokes v. Kentucky State University (2024)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
We further note that “[i]n its role as a finder of fact, an administrative agency is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the credibility of witnesses[.]” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney Gen., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998); see also McManus v. Kentucky Ret.
green Commissioner of the Department of Workplace Standards, Education and Labor Cabinet v. Kalkreuth Roofing and S… (2024)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
On issues of law, courts are “authorized to review . . . on a de novo basis.” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998).
green Interactive Education Concepts, Inc. v. Kentucky Finance and Administration Cabinet (2024)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Off. of Att’y Gen., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green Kentucky Public Pensions Authority v. Jody D. Shea (2024)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
“In its role as a finder of fact, an administrative agency is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the credibility of witnesses, including its findings and conclusions of fact.” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, Ky.App., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (1998) (citing Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller, Ky., 481 S.W.2d 298, 309 (1972)). . . .
citing Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller, Ky., 481 S.W.2d 298, 309 (1972)
green Professional Home Health Care v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services (2023)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
“Judicial review of an agency decision is limited to the determination of whether the decision was arbitrary, i.e., whether the action was taken in excess of granted powers, whether affected parties were afforded procedural due process, and whether decisions were supported by substantial evidence.” Sebastian-Voor, 265 S.W.3d at 195 (citation omitted). -5- Pursuant to KRS 13B.150(2), a court sitting in review “shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency as to the…
green David Burks v. Board of Trustees of the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government's Police and Firefighter's … (2023)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
“In its role as a finder of fact, an administrative agency is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the -7- credibility of witnesses, including its findings and conclusions of fact.” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green Viking Acquistion Group, LLC v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Energy and Enviroment Cabinet (2022)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Off. of the Att’y Gen., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998).
green Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department for Medicaid Services v. Appalachian Hospice Care, Inc. (2022)
Rule Authority · Ky.
Aubrey v. Off. of the Att’y Gen., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998).
green Charles R. Noplis, II, M.D. v. Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure (2022)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Abul-Ela v. Kentucky Bd. of Medical Licensure, 217 S.W.3d 246, 250 (Ky. App. 2006); Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998).
green Dezmon Moore v. louisville/jefferson County Metropolitan Government (2022)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky.App. 1998).
green Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department for Medicaid Services v. Help at Home, LLC (2021)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Off. of the Att’y Gen., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998).
green Mike Martindale v. Executive Branch Ethics Commission (2021)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
We further note that “[i]n its role as a finder of fact, an administrative agency is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the credibility of witnesses[.]” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney Gen., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998); see also McManus v. -12- Kentucky Ret.
green Brian Bush v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet (2020)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998).
green Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Nancy Gauze (2020)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998).
green Paul v. Brooks, Md v. Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure (2020)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Standard of Review Generally, “[w]here the legislature has designated an administrative agency to carry out a legislative policy by the exercise of discretionary judgment in a specialized field, the courts do not have the authority to review the agency decisions de novo.” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 518 (Ky. App. 1998) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Nancy Gauze (2020)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998).
green Veronica Bradley v. Kentucky Retirement Systems (2018)
Rule Authority · Ky.
“In its role as a finder of fact, an administrative agency is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the credibility of witnesses, including its findings and conclusions of fact.” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, Ky. App., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (1998) (citing Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller, Ky., 481 S.W.2d 298, 309 (1972)). 124 S.W.3d at 458 . 9 Bradley insists that given the plain language of the disability retirement statute, KRS…
citing Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller, Ky., 481 S.W.2d 298, 309 (1972)
green Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Ronald Ashcraft (2018)
Rule Authority · Ky.
“In its role as a finder of fact, an administrative agency is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the credibility of witnesses, including its findings and conclusions of fact.” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, Ky. App., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (1998) (citing Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller, Ky., 481 S.W.2d 298, 309 (1972)). 124 S.W.3d at 458 .
green Commonwealth, Cabinet for Health & Family Services v. Saint Joseph Health System, Inc. (2017)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
However, this Court is authorized to review issues of law on a de novo basis.” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney Gen., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998) (internal citation omitted).
internal citation omitted
green Smith v. Teachers' Retirement System (2017)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Off. of Att’y Gen., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky. App. 1998).
green Department of Revenue, Finance & Administration Cabinet v. Chegg, Inc. (2016)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky.Ct.App.1998).
green Parrish v. Commonwealth (2015)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
We further note that “[i]n its role as a finder of fact, an administrative agency is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the credibility of witnesses[.]” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney Gen., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky.App.1998); see also McManus v. Kentucky Ret.
green Commonwealth, Cabinet for Health & Family Services v. Rivervalley Behavioral Health (2014)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky.App.1998). .This Court will give some deference to an agency interpretation of the regulations and the law underlying them that it is .charged with implementing, so long as the “agency interpretation is in the form of an adopted regulation or formal adjudication.” See Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government v. TDC Group, LLC, 283 S.W.3d 657, 661 (Ky.2009),. quoting Board of Trustees of Judicial Form Retiremen…
green C.W.C.S. v. Commonwealth (2009)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
See also A & A Mechanical, Inc. v. Thermal Equipment Sales, Inc., 998 S.W.2d 505, 509 (Ky.App.1999); Aubrey v. Office of the Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 518-19 (Ky.App.1998); and Cinelli v. Ward, 997 S.W.2d 474, 476 (Ky.App.1998).
green CWCS v. Com. (2009)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
See also A & A Mechanical, Inc. v. Thermal Equipment Sales, Inc., 998 S.W.2d 505, 509 (Ky.App. 1999); Aubrey v. Office of the Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 518-19 (Ky.App. 1998); and Cinelli v. Ward, 997 S.W.2d 474, 476 (Ky.App.1998).
green Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Goode (2009)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Carroll v. Meredith, 59 S.W.3d 484, 489 (Ky.App.2001); see also A & A Mechanical, Inc. v. Thermal Equipment Sales, Inc., 998 S.W.2d 505, 509 (Ky.App.1999); Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 518-19 (Ky.App.1998); and Cinelli v. Ward, 997 S.W.2d 474, 476 (Ky.App.1998).
green Mt. Holly Nursing Center v. Crowdus (2008)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Carroll v. Meredith, 59 S.W.3d 484, 489 (Ky.App.2001); see also A & A Mechanical, Inc. v. Thermal Equipment Sales, Inc., 998 S.W.2d 505, 509 (Ky. App.1999); Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 518-19 (Ky.App. 1998); and Cinelli v. Ward, 997 S.W.2d 474, 476 (Ky.App.1998).
green Finance & Administration Cabinet, Department of Revenue v. Slagel (2008)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
“In its role as a finder of fact, an administrative agency is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the credibility of witnesses, including its findings and conclusions of fact.” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky.App.l998)(citing Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller, 481 S.W.2d 298, 309 (Ky.1972)).
green Commonwealth, Labor Cabinet v. Hasken (2007)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky.App.1998).
green Georgetown Municipal Water & Sewer Service v. Bur-Wal, Inc. (2007)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
“It is a fundamental rule that ‘all statutes should be interpreted to give them meaning, with each section construed to be in accord with the statute as a whole.’ ” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 518-519 (Ky.App.1998) (citing Transportation Cabinet v. *667 Tarter, 802 S.W.2d 944 (Ky.App.1990)).
green Abul-Ela v. Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure (2006)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky.App.1998).
green Marksberry v. Chandler (2004)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Revenue Cabinet, Ky.App., 40 S.W.3d 883 (2001); Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, Ky.App., 994 S.W.2d 516, 520 (1998) (quoting Revenue Cabinet v. Gaba, Ky.App., 885 S.W.2d 706, 707 (1994)). 26 .
quoting Revenue Cabinet v. Gaba, Ky.App., 885 S.W.2d 706, 707 (1994)
green McManus v. Kentucky Retirement Systems (2004)
Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App.
“In its role as a finder of fact, an administrative agency is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the credibility of witnesses, including its findings and conclusions of fact.” Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, Ky.App., 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (1998)(citing Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller, Ky., 481 S.W.2d 298, 309 (1972)).
citing Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller, Ky., 481 S.W.2d 298, 309 (1972)
green Pizza Pub of Burnside, Kentucky, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (2013)
Cited · Ky. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky.App. 1998).
green Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Bowens (2009)
Cited · Ky. · signal: see
See Aubrey v. Office of Attorney General, 994 S.W.2d 516, 519 (Ky.App.1998).
green Albarado v. Kentucky Racing Commission (2004)
Cited · W.D. Ky. · signal: see
See Aubrey v. Office of the Attorney-General, 994 S.W.2d 516 (Ky.App.1998).