National Wine & Spirits Corp. v. Indiana Alcohol & Tobacco Commission (2011)

green · 5 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 2 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 2

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green 21st Amendment, Inc. v. Indiana Alcohol & Tobacco Commission (2017)

Rule Authority · Ind. Ct. App.

Nat’l Wine & Spirits Corp. v. Ind. Alcohol & Tobacco Comm’n, 945 N.E.2d 182, 186 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011), trans. dismissed.

green Midwest Psychological Center, Inc. v. Indiana Department of Administration (2011)

Rule Authority · Ind. Ct. App.

Midwest argues that the trial court improperly granted the motions for judgment on the pleadings because Midwest does have standing to pursue its claims. “ ‘The judicial doctrine of standing focuses on whether the complaining party is the proper person to invoke the court’s *903 power.’ ” Nat’l Wine & Spirits Corp. v. Ind. Alcohol & Tobacco Comm’n, 945 N.E.2d 182, 184 (Ind.Ct.App.2011) (quoting Hauer v. BRDD of Ind., Inc., 654 N.E.2d 816, 317 (Ind.Ct.App.1995), trans. denied…