People v. Williams (2007)

green · 10 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 8

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Peo v. Christian (2025)

Rule Authority · Colo. Ct. App.

See Hard, ¶ 39; People v. Williams, 183 P.3d 577, 581 (Colo. App. 2007). ¶ 23 Second, Christian essentially asks us to reweigh the evidence, drawing all inferences in his favor.

green People v. James Clayton Johnson (2022)

Rule Authority · Colo. Ct. App.

People v. Williams, 183 P.3d 577, 581 (Colo. App. 2007) (citing Lockhart, 488 U.S. at 40 ).

citing Lockhart, 488 U.S. at 40

green People v. PLANCARTE (2009)

Rule Authority · Colo. Ct. App.

People v. Williams, 183 P.3d 577, 581 (Colo.App.2007).

green People v. Hill (2009)

Rule Authority · Colo. Ct. App.

People v. Williams, 183 P.3d 577, 578 (Colo.App.2007).

green People v. Hard (2014)

Cited · Colo. Ct. App. · signal: accord

See Lockhart v. Nelson, 488 U.S. 33, 40-42 , 109 S.Ct. 285 , 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988) (a reviewing court must consider all evidence admitted by the district court in deciding whether retrial is permissi ble under the Double Jeopardy Clause); accord People v. Williams, 183 P.3d 577, 581 (Colo.App.2007); People v. Sisneros, 44 Colo.App. 65, 68 , 606 P.2d 1317, 1319 (1980); see also United States v. Medina-Copete, 757 F.3d 1092, 1107 (10th Cir.2014) (retrial is impermissible only…

green People v. Marciano (2014)

Cited (see also) · Colo. Ct. App. · signal: see also

Sisneros , 44 Colo.App. at 67 -68 , 606 P.2d at 1319 ; see also People v. Williams , 183 P.3d 577 , 581 (Colo.App.2007) (citing Lockhart and Sisneros and remanding for retrial where the evidence, including a laboratory report that had been improperly admitted without a proper foundational witness, was held sufficient); People v. Cooper, 104 P.3d 307 , 312 (Colo.App.2004) (citing Lockhart and Sisneros ). ¶ 47 Thus, in determining whether the evidence was sufficient to justify…

green People v. Martinez (2011)

Cited · Colo. Ct. App. · signal: accord

A. Private Laboratory "We review de novo a trial court's interpretation of a statute governing the admissibility of a particular type of evidence." People v. Hill, 228 P.3d 171, 173 (Colo.App. 2009); accord People v. Williams, 183 P.3d 577, 578 (Colo.App.2007).

green People v. Rector (2009)

Cited · Colo. Ct. App. · signal: see

See People v. Williams, 183 P.3d 577, 580 (Colo. App.2007) (addressing sufficiency of evidence argument after reversing conviction on other grounds); People v. Gracey, 940 P.2d 1050, 1052 (Colo.App.1996) (grant of motion for judgment of acquittal would require dismissal of charges).