How cited: James F. Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Go Syfert

James F. Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co. (1971)

green · 214 citation events across 43 courts. Showing the 33 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197119982026
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Macklin v. Spector Freight Systems, Inc., 156 U.S.App.D.C. 69 , 478 F.2d 979, 996 (1973); Gersham v. Chambers, 501 F.2d 687 , 691 (2d Cir.1974); Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 763 (3d Cir.1971); Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. Reese, 507 F.2d 607, 610 (5th Cir.1975); Guerra v. Manchester Terminal Corp., 498 F.2d 641 , 652 (5th Cir.1974); Hill v. American Airlines, Inc., 479 F.2d 1057, 1060 (5th Cir.1973); Caldwell v. National Brewing Co., 443 F.…
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Macklin v. Spector Freight Systems, Inc., 156 U.S.App.D.C. 69 , 478 F.2d 979, 996 (1973); Gersham v. Chambers, 501 F.2d 687 , 691 (2d Cir.1974); Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 763 (3d Cir.1971); Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. Reese, 507 F.2d 607, 610 (5th Cir.1975); Guerra v. Manchester Terminal Corp., 498 F.2d 641, 652 (5th Cir.1974); Hill v. American Airlines, Inc., 479 F.2d 1057, 1060 (5th Cir.1973); Caldwell v. National Brewing Co., 443 F.2…
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 758-760 (CA3 1971); Sanders v. Dobbs Houses, Inc., 431 F.2d 1097, 1099-1100 (CA5 1970), certiorari denied 401 U.S. 948 , 91 S.Ct. 935 , 28 L.Ed.2d 231 ; and Waters v. Wisconsin Steel Works of International Harvester Company, 427 F.2d 476 , 481-485 (CA7 1970), certiorari denied 400 U.S. 911 , 91 S.Ct. 137 , 27 L.Ed.2d 151 . 2 This court has yet to directly reach the issue, although it has had occasion, in separat…
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa. · 2 citations in this opinion
Finally, the fact that Anderson may have failed to seek administrative relief before the EEOC is not a jurisdictional bar to the maintenance of an action in this Court under § 1981, Young v. International Telephone and Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 762-763 (3d Cir. 1971); nor is it a bar under Title VII, because Jones complied with the jurisdictional prerequisites to his Title VII action.
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa. · 2 citations in this opinion
Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 763 (3d Cir. 1971). 16 *429 Defendants argue that the most closely related limitation period is that found in the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, as amended, 43 P.S. § 951 et seq.
green Maybanks v. Ingraham (1974)
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa. · 2 citations in this opinion
Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 760 (C.A. 3, 1971).
Quote Authority · D.N.H.
Co., 438 F.2d 757 , 760 (3d Cir. 1971) (“In the context of the Reconstruction it would be hard to imagine to what contract right [besides employment] the Congress was more likely to have been referring.”).
“In the context of the Reconstruction it would be hard to imagine to what contract right [besides employment] the Congress was more likely to have been referring.”
Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.
Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., *612 421 U.S. 454, 459-60 , 95 .S.Ct. 1716, 44 L.Ed.2d 295 (1975); Young v. International Telephone and Telegraph, 438 F.2d 757, 759 (3d Cir. 1971).
green Henry v. Schlesinger (1976)
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Johnson, 95 S.Ct., at 1719—20 citing legislative history to Sections 716, 717 and citing Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U.S., at 48, 94 S.Ct., at 1019; Young v. International Telephone and Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 763 (3rd Cir. 1971).
green Stringer v. Nosef (1975)
Rule Authority · N.D. Miss.
A discretionary stay of § 1981 actions by the district court until the conciliation efforts of the EEOC have had a chance to bear fruit has been recognized as proper by the Third Circuit in Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 764 (1971), and the Fifth Circuit in Caldwell v. National Brewing Co., supra. Although the Young court rejected arguments that Title VII constitutes an absolute jurisdictional bar to actions under the earlier civil rights act…
Rule Authority · D. Maryland
See Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 489 F.2d 525, 531 (6th Cir. 1973); Macklin v. Spector Freight Systems, Inc., 156 U.S.App.D.C. 69 , 478 F.2d 979, 996 (1973); Brady v. Bristol-Meyers, Inc., 459 F.2d 621, 623-624 (8th Cir. 1972); Caldwell v. National Brewing Co., 443 F.2d 1044, 1046 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 916 , 92 S.Ct. 931 , 30 L.Ed.2d 785 (1972); Young v. International Telegraph & Telephone Co., 438 F.2d 757, 763 (3d Cir. 1971).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Macklin v. Spector Freight Systems, Inc., 156 U.S.App.D.C. 69 , 478 F.2d 979, 996-997 (1973) ; Brady v. Bristol-Meyers, Inc., 459 F.2d 621, 623-624 (8th Cir. 1972) ; Caldwell v. National Brewing Co., 443 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 560 , 30 L.Ed.2d 551 (1971) ; Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 763 (3rd Cir. 1971) ; Sanders v. Dobbs House, Inc., 431 F.2d 1097 , 1100-1101 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 948
green Ficklin v. Sabatini (1974)
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
The initial question raised by defendants’ motion to dismiss is whether *21 Federal employees may rely on 42 U.S.C. § 1981 to contest alleged racial discrimination in Federal employment. 2 Section 1981 is derived from the 1866 Civil Rights Act, Young v. International Telephone and Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 759 (3rd Cir. 1971), which Act was passed as a means of enforcing the provisions of the Thirteenth Amendment.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
See Waters v. Wisconsin Steel Works of International Harvester Co., 427 F.2d 476, 481-85 (7th Cir. 1970), cert, denied, 400 U. S. 911 , 91 S.Ct. 137 , 27 L.Ed.2d 151 (1970) ; Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 758-60 (3d Cir. 1971) ; Scott v. Young, 421 F.2d 143, 145 (4th Cir. 1970), cert, denied, 398 U.S. 929 , 90 S.Ct. 1820 , 26 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970) ; Brady v. Bristol-Meyers, Inc., 459 F.2d 621, 622-23 (8th Cir. 1972) ; Sanders v. Dobbs Houses, In…
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
T. & T., 438 F.2d 757, 758 (3 Cir. 1971).
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
Tel. & Tel., supra, 438 F.2d at 760-763, the implication from Waters is that a plaintiff must exhaust all his remedies under Title VII, including the institution of a civil action in appropriate cas *87 es, before he can present similar claims under § 1981.
Cited · SCOTUS · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F. 2d 757, 764 (CA3). [21] The legislative history of the 1972 amendments to Title VII reflects a strong reaffirmation of the importance of the private right of action in the Title VII enforcement scheme: "The retention of the private right of action . . . is intended to make clear that an individual aggrieved by a violation of Title VII should not be forced to abandon the claim merely because of a decision by the com…
Cited · 4th Cir. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757 (3rd Cir. 1971).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 764 (3d Cir.1971).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See *147 Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 3 Cir. 1971, 438 F.2d 757 (district court should consider availability of Title VII administrative remedy as equitable factor in determining relief); Waters v. Wisconsin Steel Works of International Harvester Co., 7 Cir. 1970, 427 F.2d 476 (Court engrafts onto § 1981 the jurisdictional requirement that plaintiff use Title VII administrative remedies or plead a reasonable excuse for failing to do so). 2 In keeping wit…
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757 (3d Cir. 1971). 14 As is well known, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits racial and other types of discrimination in employment in industries covered by the Act.
green Johnson v. Alexander (1978)
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757 (3d Cir. 1971).
green Hines v. D'Artois (1976)
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See 438 F.2d at 764 .
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see
See Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., supra, 438 F.2d at 764 .
Cited · D. Conn. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Young v. International Telephone and Telegraph Co., supra, 438 F.2d at 760 n. 4; Note, Racial Discrimination in Employment under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 36 U.Chi.L.Rev. 615, 619 (1969) (“While Congress did not debate the scope of the term ‘contracts,’ the one specific contract which was referred to and discussed was the employment contract,” id. at 619.) There is no indication that Congress intended in restating § 1981 in 1870 or 1874 not to rely upon the Thirteent…
Cited · E.D.N.Y · signal: accord
Accord, Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757 (3d Cir. 1971) (action under § 1981 to recover lost wages and to enjoin breach of contract).
action under § 1981 to recover lost wages and to enjoin breach of contract
Cited (see also) · E.D. Pa. · signal: see also
See also, Young v. International Telephone and Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757 (3d Cir. 1971).
green Percy v. Brennan (1974)
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Young v. International Telephone and Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 763-764 (3d Cir. 1971) and Sanders v. Dobbs Houses, Inc., 431 F.2d 1097, 1101 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 948 , 91 S.Ct. 935 , 28 L.Ed.2d 231 (1971); see also Caldwell v. National Brewing Co., 443 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 916 , 92 S.Ct. 931 , 30 L.Ed.2d 785 (1972). 3.
Cited · W.D. La. · signal: accord
Accord, Young v. International *1089 Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757 (3rd Cir., 1971) ; Macklin v. Spector Freight Systems, Inc., 156 U.S.App.D.C. 69 , 478 F.2d 979 (1973).
Cited · N.D. Ohio · signal: see
See Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757, 758-760 (3d Cir. 1971); Sanders v. Dobbs Houses, Inc., 431 F.2d 1097, 1099-1100 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. den., 401 U.S. 948 , 91 S.Ct. 935 , 28 L.Ed.2d 231 (1971); Waters v. Wisconsin Steel Works of International Harvester Co., 427 F.2d 476, 481-485 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. den., 400 U.S. 911 , 91 S.Ct. 137 , 27 L.Ed.2d 151 (1970); Brady v. Bristol-Meyers, Inc., 459 F.2d 621, 622-624 (8th Cir. 1972).
Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: compare
Compare, Caldwell v. National Brewing Company, 443 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 404 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 560 , 30 L.Ed.2d 551 (1971), and Young v. International Telephone and Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757 (3rd Cir. 1971).
Cited · S.D. Tex. · signal: see
See Young v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co., 438 F.2d 757 (3d Cir. 1971); Waters v. Wisconsin Steel Works of International Harvester Co., 427 F.2d 476 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 911 , 91 S.Ct. 137 , 27 L.Ed.2d 151 (1970).